The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Radford

Big South · 16–16

Power-4.3#224 of 365
Résumé-4.70#606 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLongwood (85–83)
Worst lossCleveland State (82–87)
Schedule faced-7.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Western Illinois W 80–75 +20.0 -15.0
1 vs West Virginia Wesleyan non-D1 W 99–61 +36.3 +1.7
2 at North Carolina L 74–89 -24.7 +9.7
2 N Wright State L 59–92 -6.5 -26.5
2 N Cleveland State L 82–87 +6.4 -11.4
3 at South Carolina L 58–87 -12.4 -16.6
3 vs UNC Wilmington L 73–81 -6.5 -1.5
4 at SMU L 72–89 -21.0 +4.0
4 vs Notre Dame (Md) non-D1 W 102–75 +36.3 -9.3
5 vs Southern Miss L 75–82 +2.5 -9.5
5 vs St. Francis (PA) W 89–56 +16.1 +16.9
6 vs Coppin State W 107–77 +21.5 +8.5
7 at William & Mary L 83–96 -7.9 -5.1
7 vs VMI W 97–90 +16.4 -9.4
8 vs Shenandoah non-D1 W 87–44 +36.3 +6.7
9 at South Carolina Upstate W 76–69 +2.5 +4.5
10 vs Presbyterian W 80–61 +4.7 +14.3
10 vs UNC Asheville L 72–91 +2.5 -21.5
11 at Gardner-Webb W 89–80 +14.1 -5.1
11 vs Longwood W 85–83 +3.1 -1.1
12 at Winthrop L 75–76 -9.9 +8.9
12 vs High Point L 83–93 -12.4 +2.4
13 at Charleston Southern W 84–75 -1.1 +10.1
13 at Presbyterian W 93–84 -0.8 +9.8
14 vs Winthrop L 78–80 -4.5 +2.5
14 at High Point L 77–86 -17.8 +8.8
15 vs Charleston Southern W 90–80 +4.3 +5.7
16 vs Gardner-Webb W 82–70 +19.5 -7.5
16 at UNC Asheville L 73–74 -2.9 +1.9
17 vs South Carolina Upstate W 71–59 +8.0 +4.0
17 at Longwood L 74–90 -2.4 -13.6
18 N Presbyterian L 85–91 +2.0 -8.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #92 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #262 of 326 (12-16)2005–06: #202 of 326 (16-13)2006–07: #283 of 326 (8-22)2007–08: #301 of 328 (10-20)2008–09: #115 of 330 (21-12)2009–10: #116 of 335 (19-12)2010–11: #332 of 346 (5-24)2011–12: #301 of 345 (6-25)2012–13: #258 of 347 (10-19)2013–14: #198 of 351 (22-13)2014–15: #127 of 351 (22-12)2015–16: #194 of 351 (16-15)2016–17: #245 of 351 (14-18)2017–18: #114 of 351 (23-13)2018–19: #92 of 353 (19-11)2019–20: #121 of 353 (19-11)2020–21: #185 of 347 (15-12)2021–22: #272 of 358 (11-18)2022–23: #164 of 363 (21-15)2023–24: #195 of 362 (16-17)2024–25: #163 of 364 (20-13)2025–26: #224 of 365 (16-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 224 of 365 16–16 -4.26 Power
2024–25 163 of 364 20–13 0.16 Power
2023–24 195 of 362 16–17 -2.16 Power
2022–23 164 of 363 21–15 0.43 Power
2021–22 272 of 358 11–18 -7.27 Power
2020–21 185 of 347 15–12 -1.36 Power
2019–20 121 of 353 19–11 53.86 MRI
2018–19 92 of 353 19–11 67.48 MRI
2017–18 114 of 351 23–13 63.92 MRI
2016–17 245 of 351 14–18 4.00 MRI
2015–16 194 of 351 16–15 24.84 MRI
2014–15 127 of 351 22–12 55.21 MRI
2013–14 198 of 351 22–13 27.43 MRI
2012–13 258 of 347 10–19 -15.78 MRI
2011–12 301 of 345 6–25 -32.94 MRI
2010–11 332 of 346 5–24 -67.07 MRI
2009–10 116 of 335 19–12 60.96 MRI
2008–09 115 of 330 21–12 59.05 MRI
2007–08 301 of 328 10–20 -38.70 MRI
2006–07 283 of 326 8–22 -26.59 MRI
2005–06 202 of 326 16–13 20.03 MRI
2004–05 262 of 326 12–16 -8.80 MRI