The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

UMass Lowell

Am. East · 3–1

Power-6.6#250 of 365
Résumé+0.19#150 · wins above average
Movement-10down from #240 last week
Best winMarist (63–61)
Worst lossMassachusetts (62–72)
Schedule faced-11.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-7.4 avg opponent
Returning production7% of last season's win shares · #291 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production2.5 win shares from other schools' players
Recruiting class#80 in the country

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+13.4 avg× 33%+4.5
Opponents faced-11.8 avg× 33%-4.0
Preseason prior-10.6× 67%-7.1
Power-6.6

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Rivier non-D1 W 121–57 +29.6 +34.4 +0.7
2 at Merrimack W 71–61 -3.4 +13.4 +1.4
2 vs Marist W 63–61 +1.9 +0.1 -0.9
3 at Massachusetts L 62–72 -7.2 -2.8 -0.7
Preseason prior (67% of the rating)-7.1
Power-6.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
4 vs Saint Peter's +8.4 78%
4 at Cincinnati -32.0 0%
5 N Hampton +2.0 57%
5 at American University -8.7 22%
5 N Radford -1.0 46%
6 at Georgetown -16.3 7%
6 at Boston College -16.5 7%
10 vs New Hampshire +6.1 71%

Season by season

Best finish: #116 in 2022–23. 13 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2013–14 (MRI Classic): #329 of 351 (10-18)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #314 of 351 (12-17)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #314 of 351 (11-18)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #287 of 351 (11-20)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #279 of 351 (12-18)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #246 of 353 (13-17)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #249 of 353 (12-19)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #237 of 347 (11-12)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #226 of 358 (15-16)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 363 (26-8)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #130 of 362 (22-10)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #178 of 364 (17-15)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #283 of 365 (15-18) MRI 2.0Classic 2013–14 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 15–18 #283 of 365 · -8.78 –
2024–25 17–15 #178 of 364 · -1.09 –
2023–24 22–10 #130 of 362 · 2.86 –
2022–23 26–8 #116 of 363 · 3.97 –
2021–22 15–16 #226 of 358 · -3.84 –
2020–21 11–12 #237 of 347 · -4.77 –
2019–20 12–19 – #249 of 353 · -1.16
2018–19 13–17 – #246 of 353 · -2.27
2017–18 12–18 – #279 of 351 · -12.12
2016–17 11–20 – #287 of 351 · -15.20
2015–16 11–18 – #314 of 351 · -35.01
2014–15 12–17 – #314 of 351 · -30.59
2013–14 10–18 – #329 of 351 · -52.12