The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

American University

Patriot · 1–2

Power-0.9#153 of 365
Résumé+0.24#139 · wins above average
Movement—unchanged from #153 last week
Best winDrexel (66–64)
Worst lossClemson (73–82)
Schedule faced+9.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-3.5 avg opponent
Returning production86% of last season's win shares · #3 of 364
Incoming production0.0 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-6.5 avg× 27%-1.8
Opponents faced+9.7 avg× 27%+2.6
Preseason prior-2.4× 73%-1.7
Power-0.9

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Cincinnati L 53–79 -26.3 +0.3 -0.3
2 at Clemson L 73–82 -18.2 +9.2 +0.8
3 at Drexel W 66–64 +3.9 -1.9 +0.3
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-1.7
Power-0.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Harvard +0.2 51%
4 vs Mary Baldwin non-D1 +35.3 100%
4 vs Towson +2.3 58%
5 vs Radford +7.7 76%
5 vs UMass Lowell +8.7 78%
5 vs Hampton +10.7 83%
6 at Maryland -14.3 10%
6 at UCF -13.8 10%

Season by season

Best finish: #93 in 2008–09. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #156 of 326 (15-12)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #227 of 326 (12-17)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #131 of 326 (16-14)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #119 of 328 (21-12)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #93 of 330 (24-8)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #283 of 335 (11-20)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #133 of 346 (22-9)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #163 of 345 (19-10)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #286 of 347 (10-20)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #116 of 351 (20-13)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #208 of 351 (17-16)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #328 of 351 (12-19)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #312 of 351 (8-22)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #326 of 351 (6-24)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #154 of 353 (15-15)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #185 of 353 (16-14)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #252 of 347 (4-6)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #331 of 358 (10-22)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #277 of 363 (17-15)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #279 of 362 (16-16)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #236 of 364 (22-13)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #221 of 365 (16-16) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 16–16 #221 of 365 · -4.62 –
2024–25 22–13 #236 of 364 · -4.85 –
2023–24 16–16 #279 of 362 · -7.07 –
2022–23 17–15 #277 of 363 · -7.31 –
2021–22 10–22 #331 of 358 · -12.56 –
2020–21 4–6 #252 of 347 · -5.81 –
2019–20 16–14 – #185 of 353 · 29.89
2018–19 15–15 – #154 of 353 · 37.85
2017–18 6–24 – #326 of 351 · -46.85
2016–17 8–22 – #312 of 351 · -31.74
2015–16 12–19 – #328 of 351 · -48.12
2014–15 17–16 – #208 of 351 · 21.42
2013–14 20–13 – #116 of 351 · 61.36
2012–13 10–20 – #286 of 347 · -25.47
2011–12 19–10 – #163 of 345 · 38.43
2010–11 22–9 – #133 of 346 · 51.86
2009–10 11–20 – #283 of 335 · -19.94
2008–09 24–8 – #93 of 330 · 72.53
2007–08 21–12 – #119 of 328 · 58.77
2006–07 16–14 – #131 of 326 · 48.90
2005–06 12–17 – #227 of 326 · 7.49
2004–05 15–12 – #156 of 326 · 34.86