The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Rhode Island

A-10 · 16–16

Power+1.3#145 of 365
Résumé+0.57#155 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSaint Louis (81–76)
Worst lossLoyola Chicago (57–61)
Schedule faced+0.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Stetson W 93–62 +16.6 +14.4
1 N Tulsa L 65–82 -8.3 -8.7
2 vs Stonehill W 80–57 +17.3 +5.7
2 vs UAlbany W 80–61 +13.5 +5.5
3 at Yale W 86–77 -11.7 +20.7
4 N Towson L 55–62 +0.3 -7.3
4 N Vermont W 80–65 +3.7 +11.3
4 N Temple W 90–75 +1.1 +13.8
5 vs Brown W 66–56 +11.6 -1.6
5 at Providence L 71–90 -9.7 -9.3
6 vs McNeese L 64–66 -5.9 +3.9
7 vs Canisius W 62–45 +20.4 -3.4
8 vs Northeastern W 85–77 +13.1 -5.1
9 vs Loyola Chicago L 57–61 +11.7 -15.7
9 at George Mason L 50–61 -8.4 -2.6
10 vs La Salle L 72–79 +9.9 -16.9
10 at Davidson W 70–45 -4.5 +29.5
11 vs VCU L 75–84 -11.1 +2.1
12 at Richmond W 69–68 -1.6 +2.6
12 vs George Mason W 74–65 -3.0 +12.0
13 at Dayton W 81–76 -11.4 +16.4
13 at Duquesne L 61–76 -3.5 -11.5
14 vs Richmond W 82–77 +3.9 +1.1
15 at George Washington L 70–75 -9.2 +4.2
15 vs Fordham L 66–70 +5.6 -9.6
16 vs Saint Louis W 81–76 -12.5 +17.5
16 at La Salle L 46–59 +4.5 -17.5
17 at St. Bonaventure L 76–94 -4.1 -13.9
17 vs Saint Joseph's L 55–61 -0.3 -5.7
18 vs Duquesne W 64–52 +2.0 +10.0
18 at Fordham L 49–61 +0.1 -12.1
19 N Duquesne L 61–67 -0.7 -5.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #29 in 2017–18. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #264 of 326 (6-21)2005–06: #146 of 326 (14-14)2006–07: #155 of 326 (19-14)2007–08: #63 of 328 (21-12)2008–09: #60 of 330 (23-11)2009–10: #59 of 335 (26-10)2010–11: #130 of 346 (20-14)2011–12: #278 of 345 (7-24)2012–13: #249 of 347 (8-21)2013–14: #163 of 351 (14-18)2014–15: #52 of 351 (23-10)2015–16: #85 of 351 (17-15)2016–17: #31 of 351 (25-10)2017–18: #29 of 351 (26-8)2018–19: #111 of 353 (18-15)2019–20: #42 of 353 (21-9)2020–21: #119 of 347 (10-15)2021–22: #148 of 358 (15-16)2022–23: #253 of 363 (9-22)2023–24: #246 of 362 (12-20)2024–25: #170 of 364 (18-13)2025–26: #145 of 365 (16-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 145 of 365 16–16 1.26 Power
2024–25 170 of 364 18–13 -0.33 Power
2023–24 246 of 362 12–20 -5.04 Power
2022–23 253 of 363 9–22 -5.38 Power
2021–22 148 of 358 15–16 1.97 Power
2020–21 119 of 347 10–15 3.87 Power
2019–20 42 of 353 21–9 96.65 MRI
2018–19 111 of 353 18–15 59.05 MRI
2017–18 29 of 351 26–8 127.06 MRI
2016–17 31 of 351 25–10 121.26 MRI
2015–16 85 of 351 17–15 80.20 MRI
2014–15 52 of 351 23–10 99.11 MRI
2013–14 163 of 351 14–18 40.51 MRI
2012–13 249 of 347 8–21 -7.38 MRI
2011–12 278 of 345 7–24 -14.94 MRI
2010–11 130 of 346 20–14 52.79 MRI
2009–10 59 of 335 26–10 102.03 MRI
2008–09 60 of 330 23–11 95.10 MRI
2007–08 63 of 328 21–12 91.66 MRI
2006–07 155 of 326 19–14 36.23 MRI
2005–06 146 of 326 14–14 39.97 MRI
2004–05 264 of 326 6–21 -10.80 MRI