The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Saint Louis

A-10 · 29–6

Power+16.5#32 of 365
Résumé+12.77#35 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winGeorgia (102–77)
Worst lossRhode Island (76–81)
Schedule faced+1.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Southeast Missouri State W 92–67 +22.4 +2.6
1 vs Chicago State W 108–86 +36.8 -14.8
2 vs Lindenwood W 109–66 +25.5 +17.5
2 vs Grand Canyon W 78–64 +8.7 +5.3
3 vs Purdue Fort Wayne W 91–60 +23.7 +7.3
4 N Santa Clara W 71–70 +1.3 -0.3
4 N Stanford L 77–78 +7.4 -8.4
5 at Loyola Marymount W 91–70 +14.5 +6.5
5 vs Central Michigan W 107–65 +26.5 +15.5
6 vs San Francisco W 85–75 +15.2 -5.2
7 vs Bethune-Cookman W 112–53 +25.8 +33.2
7 vs New Hampshire W 93–79 +33.8 -19.8
8 vs Principia College non-D1 W 114–33 +57.1 +23.9
9 vs Saint Joseph's W 102–79 +15.0 +8.0
10 at VCU W 71–62 -1.3 +10.3
10 at La Salle W 84–72 +19.7 -7.7
11 vs Fordham W 78–56 +20.8 +1.2
11 vs Richmond W 88–63 +19.1 +5.9
12 at Duquesne W 81–77 +11.8 -7.8
12 at St. Bonaventure W 97–62 +11.1 +23.9
13 vs George Washington W 79–76 +11.5 -8.5
13 vs Dayton W 102–71 +9.3 +21.7
14 at Davidson W 91–82 +10.7 -1.7
14 vs La Salle W 82–58 +25.2 -1.2
15 at Loyola Chicago W 86–59 +21.4 +5.6
16 at Rhode Island L 76–81 +12.5 -17.5
16 vs VCU W 88–75 +4.1 +8.9
17 at Dayton L 62–77 +3.9 -18.9
17 vs Duquesne W 91–76 +17.2 -2.2
18 vs Loyola Chicago W 79–65 +26.9 -12.9
18 at George Mason L 57–86 +6.8 -35.8
19 N George Washington W 88–81 +8.7 -1.7
19 N Dayton L 69–70 +6.6 -7.6
20 N Georgia W 102–77 +0.0 +25.0
20 N Michigan L 72–95 -16.1 -6.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2012–13. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #222 of 326 (9-21)2005–06: #132 of 326 (16-13)2006–07: #135 of 326 (20-13)2007–08: #189 of 328 (16-15)2008–09: #153 of 330 (18-14)2009–10: #120 of 335 (23-13)2010–11: #169 of 346 (12-19)2011–12: #15 of 345 (26-8)2012–13: #11 of 347 (27-6)2013–14: #36 of 351 (27-7)2014–15: #303 of 351 (11-21)2015–16: #275 of 351 (11-21)2016–17: #311 of 351 (12-21)2017–18: #138 of 351 (16-15)2018–19: #71 of 353 (23-13)2019–20: #27 of 353 (22-8)2020–21: #56 of 347 (14-7)2021–22: #64 of 358 (23-12)2022–23: #88 of 363 (21-12)2023–24: #194 of 362 (13-20)2024–25: #132 of 364 (19-15)2025–26: #32 of 365 (29-6) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 32 of 365 29–6 16.49 Power
2024–25 132 of 364 19–15 2.58 Power
2023–24 194 of 362 13–20 -2.14 Power
2022–23 88 of 363 21–12 7.15 Power
2021–22 64 of 358 23–12 9.73 Power
2020–21 56 of 347 14–7 9.28 Power
2019–20 27 of 353 22–8 112.56 MRI
2018–19 71 of 353 23–13 81.31 MRI
2017–18 138 of 351 16–15 51.91 MRI
2016–17 311 of 351 12–21 -31.05 MRI
2015–16 275 of 351 11–21 -14.15 MRI
2014–15 303 of 351 11–21 -27.00 MRI
2013–14 36 of 351 27–7 119.74 MRI
2012–13 11 of 347 27–6 157.12 MRI
2011–12 15 of 345 26–8 151.22 MRI
2010–11 169 of 346 12–19 35.42 MRI
2009–10 120 of 335 23–13 59.49 MRI
2008–09 153 of 330 18–14 39.65 MRI
2007–08 189 of 328 16–15 21.29 MRI
2006–07 135 of 326 20–13 46.53 MRI
2005–06 132 of 326 16–13 45.61 MRI
2004–05 222 of 326 9–21 10.54 MRI