The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UCLA

Big Ten · 24–12

Power+17.1#31 of 365
Résumé+13.66#28 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winIllinois (95–94)
Worst lossCalifornia (72–80)
Schedule faced+10.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Eastern Washington W 80–74 +23.2 -17.2
1 vs Pepperdine W 74–63 +29.7 -18.7
2 vs West Georgia W 83–62 +31.6 -10.6
2 N Arizona L 65–69 -14.3 +10.3
3 vs Sacramento State W 79–48 +30.1 +0.9
3 vs Presbyterian W 86–46 +26.0 +14.0
4 N California L 72–80 +10.0 -18.0
5 at Washington W 82–80 +3.5 -1.5
5 vs Oregon W 74–63 +12.6 -1.6
6 at Gonzaga L 72–82 -10.4 +0.4
7 vs Arizona State W 90–77 +11.4 +1.6
7 vs Cal Poly W 108–87 +25.1 -4.1
8 vs UC Riverside W 97–65 +26.8 +5.2
9 at Iowa L 61–74 -3.4 -9.6
10 at Wisconsin L 72–80 -5.1 -2.9
10 vs Maryland W 67–55 +14.5 -2.5
11 at Penn State W 71–60 +11.8 -0.8
11 at Ohio State L 74–86 -3.2 -8.8
12 vs Purdue W 69–67 -5.8 +7.8
12 vs Northwestern W 71–64 +9.4 -2.4
13 at Oregon W 73–57 +7.2 +8.8
13 vs Indiana L 97–98 +5.5 -6.5
14 vs Rutgers W 98–66 +17.0 +15.0
14 vs Washington W 77–73 +9.0 -5.0
15 at Michigan L 56–86 -18.3 -11.7
16 at Michigan State L 59–82 -10.0 -13.0
16 vs Illinois W 95–94 -6.8 +7.8
17 vs USC W 81–62 +11.0 +8.0
17 at Minnesota L 73–78 +7.3 -12.3
18 vs Nebraska W 72–52 -1.2 +21.2
18 at USC W 89–68 +5.6 +15.4
19 N Rutgers W 72–59 +14.3 -1.3
19 N Michigan State W 88–84 -7.3 +11.3
19 N Purdue L 66–73 -8.5 +1.5
20 N UCF W 75–71 +5.8 -1.8
21 N UConn L 57–73 -7.2 -8.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #4 in 2022–23. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #89 of 326 (17-11)2005–06: #6 of 326 (32-7)2006–07: #7 of 326 (30-6)2007–08: #4 of 328 (35-4)2008–09: #14 of 330 (26-9)2009–10: #182 of 335 (14-18)2010–11: #70 of 346 (23-11)2011–12: #74 of 345 (19-13)2012–13: #53 of 347 (25-9)2013–14: #6 of 351 (28-9)2014–15: #44 of 351 (22-14)2015–16: #120 of 351 (15-17)2016–17: #15 of 351 (31-5)2017–18: #66 of 351 (21-12)2018–19: #112 of 353 (17-16)2019–20: #89 of 353 (18-12)2020–21: #27 of 347 (22-10)2021–22: #6 of 358 (27-8)2022–23: #4 of 363 (31-6)2023–24: #75 of 362 (16-17)2024–25: #27 of 364 (23-11)2025–26: #31 of 365 (24-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 31 of 365 24–12 17.06 Power
2024–25 27 of 364 23–11 16.42 Power
2023–24 75 of 362 16–17 8.17 Power
2022–23 4 of 363 31–6 22.18 Power
2021–22 6 of 358 27–8 19.38 Power
2020–21 27 of 347 22–10 12.62 Power
2019–20 89 of 353 18–12 74.03 MRI
2018–19 112 of 353 17–16 59.02 MRI
2017–18 66 of 351 21–12 92.91 MRI
2016–17 15 of 351 31–5 171.24 MRI
2015–16 120 of 351 15–17 62.51 MRI
2014–15 44 of 351 22–14 108.29 MRI
2013–14 6 of 351 28–9 182.73 MRI
2012–13 53 of 347 25–9 101.15 MRI
2011–12 74 of 345 19–13 86.47 MRI
2010–11 70 of 346 23–11 86.95 MRI
2009–10 182 of 335 14–18 29.78 MRI
2008–09 14 of 330 26–9 162.02 MRI
2007–08 4 of 328 35–4 224.23 MRI
2006–07 7 of 326 30–6 181.05 MRI
2005–06 6 of 326 32–7 166.89 MRI
2004–05 89 of 326 17–11 69.74 MRI