The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

St. John's

Big East · 3–0

Power+23.1#18 of 365
Résumé+0.92#41 · wins above average
Movement+1up from #19 last week
Best winMonmouth (78–63)
Schedule faced-3.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+14.8 avg opponent
Returning production16% of last season's win shares · #223 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production15.6 win shares from other schools' players
Recruiting class#85 in the country

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+26.0 avg× 27%+7.1
Opponents faced-3.8 avg× 27%-1.0
Preseason prior+23.4× 73%+17.0
Power+23.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Monmouth W 78–63 +27.7 -12.7 +1.1
2 vs Iona W 104–65 +31.1 +7.9 +2.7
3 vs Colgate W 90–59 +30.7 +0.3 +2.3
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)+17.0
Power+23.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
4 vs Syracuse +11.8 86%
4 vs Siena +27.6 99%
5 N Oregon +11.3 85%
6 vs Arizona +1.1 54%
7 N Alabama -1.5 44%

Season by season

Best finish: #12 in 2025–26. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #158 of 326 (8-18)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #138 of 326 (11-15)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #158 of 326 (16-15)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #194 of 328 (11-19)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #158 of 330 (16-18)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #101 of 335 (17-16)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #61 of 346 (21-12)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #208 of 345 (13-17)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #141 of 347 (16-15)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #64 of 351 (20-13)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #80 of 351 (21-12)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #303 of 351 (8-24)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #203 of 351 (14-19)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #156 of 351 (16-17)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #96 of 353 (21-13)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #81 of 353 (17-15)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 347 (16-11)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 358 (17-15)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 363 (18-15)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 362 (20-13)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 364 (31-5)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 365 (30-7) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 30–7 #12 of 365 · 24.72 –
2024–25 31–5 #12 of 364 · 22.16 –
2023–24 20–13 #23 of 362 · 15.64 –
2022–23 18–15 #84 of 363 · 7.93 –
2021–22 17–15 #64 of 358 · 9.66 –
2020–21 16–11 #91 of 347 · 6.90 –
2019–20 17–15 – #81 of 353 · 77.25
2018–19 21–13 – #96 of 353 · 66.44
2017–18 16–17 – #156 of 351 · 45.15
2016–17 14–19 – #203 of 351 · 27.31
2015–16 8–24 – #303 of 351 · -30.05
2014–15 21–12 – #80 of 351 · 82.88
2013–14 20–13 – #64 of 351 · 91.20
2012–13 16–15 – #141 of 347 · 41.24
2011–12 13–17 – #208 of 345 · 18.10
2010–11 21–12 – #61 of 346 · 97.73
2009–10 17–16 – #101 of 335 · 67.13
2008–09 16–18 – #158 of 330 · 38.31
2007–08 11–19 – #194 of 328 · 20.43
2006–07 16–15 – #158 of 326 · 34.40
2005–06 11–15 – #138 of 326 · 42.24
2004–05 8–18 – #158 of 326 · 32.80