The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Florida State

ACC · 18–15

Power+8.7#76 of 365
Résumé+6.94#75 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winClemson (70–65)
Worst lossMassachusetts (95–103)
Schedule faced+7.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Alcorn State W 108–76 +29.3 +2.7
1 vs Alabama State W 101–64 +23.8 +13.2
2 at Florida L 76–78 -23.1 +21.1
3 vs UT Martin W 87–73 +15.0 -1.0
3 vs Georgia Southern W 98–72 +16.6 +9.4
4 vs Cal State Bakersfield W 89–59 +26.2 +3.8
4 N Texas A&M L 59–95 -6.9 -29.1
5 vs Georgia L 73–107 -5.0 -29.0
5 N Houston L 67–82 -19.4 +4.4
6 N Massachusetts L 95–103 +10.5 -18.5
7 at Dayton L 69–97 -3.9 -24.1
7 vs Mississippi Valley State W 96–49 +41.3 +5.7
8 vs Jacksonville W 87–63 +20.1 +3.9
9 at North Carolina L 66–79 -11.7 -1.3
9 vs Duke L 87–91 -20.4 +16.4
10 vs NC State L 69–113 -2.3 -41.7
11 at Syracuse L 86–94 -0.1 -7.9
11 vs Wake Forest L 68–69 +2.6 -3.6
12 at Miami W 65–63 -7.5 +9.5
12 at SMU L 80–83 -8.0 +5.0
13 vs California W 63–61 +4.4 -2.4
13 vs Stanford W 88–80 +2.4 +5.6
14 at Notre Dame W 82–79 +1.0 +2.0
15 vs Virginia L 58–61 -6.8 +3.8
15 at Virginia Tech W 92–69 -3.0 +26.0
16 vs Boston College W 80–72 +13.1 -5.1
16 at Clemson W 70–65 -9.9 +14.9
17 vs Miami L 73–83 -2.1 -7.9
17 at Georgia Tech W 80–71 +7.2 +1.8
18 at Pittsburgh W 75–74 +0.4 +0.6
18 vs SMU W 91–78 -2.5 +15.5
19 N California W 95–89 +1.6 +4.4
19 N Duke L 79–80 -23.1 +22.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2019–20. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #173 of 326 (11-18)2005–06: #63 of 326 (20-10)2006–07: #42 of 326 (22-13)2007–08: #81 of 328 (19-15)2008–09: #76 of 330 (25-10)2009–10: #58 of 335 (22-10)2010–11: #44 of 346 (23-11)2011–12: #27 of 345 (25-10)2012–13: #162 of 347 (18-15)2013–14: #67 of 351 (22-14)2014–15: #156 of 351 (17-16)2015–16: #74 of 351 (20-14)2016–17: #20 of 351 (26-9)2017–18: #44 of 351 (23-12)2018–19: #16 of 353 (29-8)2019–20: #11 of 353 (26-5)2020–21: #20 of 347 (18-7)2021–22: #102 of 358 (17-14)2022–23: #210 of 363 (9-23)2023–24: #109 of 362 (17-16)2024–25: #93 of 364 (17-15)2025–26: #76 of 365 (18-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 76 of 365 18–15 8.71 Power
2024–25 93 of 364 17–15 6.39 Power
2023–24 109 of 362 17–16 4.84 Power
2022–23 210 of 363 9–23 -2.55 Power
2021–22 102 of 358 17–14 5.46 Power
2020–21 20 of 347 18–7 13.95 Power
2019–20 11 of 353 26–5 132.67 MRI
2018–19 16 of 353 29–8 152.16 MRI
2017–18 44 of 351 23–12 113.44 MRI
2016–17 20 of 351 26–9 149.76 MRI
2015–16 74 of 351 20–14 87.35 MRI
2014–15 156 of 351 17–16 40.78 MRI
2013–14 67 of 351 22–14 87.76 MRI
2012–13 162 of 347 18–15 34.93 MRI
2011–12 27 of 345 25–10 132.48 MRI
2010–11 44 of 346 23–11 108.83 MRI
2009–10 58 of 335 22–10 104.41 MRI
2008–09 76 of 330 25–10 84.68 MRI
2007–08 81 of 328 19–15 75.81 MRI
2006–07 42 of 326 22–13 116.45 MRI
2005–06 63 of 326 20–10 89.79 MRI
2004–05 173 of 326 11–18 27.84 MRI