The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Texas Tech

Big 12 · 23–11

Power+21.5#16 of 365
Résumé+15.34#21 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winDuke (82–81)
Worst lossArizona State (67–72)
Schedule faced+13.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Lindenwood W 98–60 +30.5 +7.5
1 vs Sam Houston W 98–77 +20.0 +1.0
2 at Illinois L 77–81 -7.8 +3.8
2 vs Milwaukee W 80–63 +29.7 -12.7
3 N Wake Forest W 84–83 +12.7 -11.7
3 N Purdue L 56–86 -4.1 -25.9
4 vs New Orleans W 82–50 +31.0 +1.0
4 vs Wyoming W 76–72 +19.7 -15.7
5 N LSU W 82–58 +12.0 +12.0
6 N Arkansas L 86–93 +0.5 -7.5
7 vs Northern Colorado W 101–90 +22.4 -11.4
7 N Duke W 82–81 -10.3 +11.3
8 vs Winthrop W 87–57 +21.3 +8.7
9 vs Oklahoma State W 102–80 +16.4 +5.6
10 at Houston L 65–69 -9.4 +5.4
10 at Colorado W 73–71 +10.2 -8.2
11 vs Utah W 88–74 +21.3 -7.3
11 vs BYU W 84–71 +5.0 +8.0
12 at Baylor W 92–73 +5.3 +13.7
12 vs Houston W 90–86 -3.9 +7.9
13 at UCF L 80–88 +7.5 -15.5
14 vs Kansas L 61–64 +4.0 -7.0
14 at West Virginia W 70–63 +7.0 +0.0
15 vs Colorado W 78–44 +15.7 +18.3
15 at Arizona W 78–75 -12.6 +15.6
16 at Arizona State L 67–72 +10.4 -15.4
16 vs Kansas State W 100–72 +19.3 +8.7
17 vs Cincinnati W 80–68 +9.8 +2.2
17 at Iowa State W 82–73 -7.9 +16.9
18 vs TCU L 65–73 +11.3 -19.3
18 at BYU L 76–82 -0.4 -5.6
19 N Iowa State L 53–75 -5.1 -16.9
20 N Akron W 91–71 +9.7 +10.3
21 N Alabama L 65–90 -2.9 -22.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #6 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #41 of 326 (22-11)2005–06: #193 of 326 (15-17)2006–07: #95 of 326 (21-13)2007–08: #126 of 328 (16-15)2008–09: #177 of 330 (14-19)2009–10: #103 of 335 (19-16)2010–11: #194 of 346 (13-19)2011–12: #297 of 345 (8-23)2012–13: #253 of 347 (11-20)2013–14: #127 of 351 (14-18)2014–15: #205 of 351 (13-19)2015–16: #97 of 351 (19-13)2016–17: #65 of 351 (18-14)2017–18: #18 of 351 (26-10)2018–19: #6 of 353 (31-7)2019–20: #38 of 353 (18-13)2020–21: #15 of 347 (18-11)2021–22: #7 of 358 (27-10)2022–23: #40 of 363 (16-16)2023–24: #30 of 362 (23-11)2024–25: #12 of 364 (28-9)2025–26: #16 of 365 (23-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 16 of 365 23–11 21.52 Power
2024–25 12 of 364 28–9 21.39 Power
2023–24 30 of 362 23–11 13.91 Power
2022–23 40 of 363 16–16 12.03 Power
2021–22 7 of 358 27–10 19.26 Power
2020–21 15 of 347 18–11 15.18 Power
2019–20 38 of 353 18–13 102.61 MRI
2018–19 6 of 353 31–7 202.02 MRI
2017–18 18 of 351 26–10 149.41 MRI
2016–17 65 of 351 18–14 89.65 MRI
2015–16 97 of 351 19–13 74.44 MRI
2014–15 205 of 351 13–19 22.07 MRI
2013–14 127 of 351 14–18 54.40 MRI
2012–13 253 of 347 11–20 -9.88 MRI
2011–12 297 of 345 8–23 -27.88 MRI
2010–11 194 of 346 13–19 27.39 MRI
2009–10 103 of 335 19–16 66.78 MRI
2008–09 177 of 330 14–19 30.69 MRI
2007–08 126 of 328 16–15 55.50 MRI
2006–07 95 of 326 21–13 69.95 MRI
2005–06 193 of 326 15–17 23.58 MRI
2004–05 41 of 326 22–11 103.19 MRI