The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Illinois

Big Ten · 28–9

Power+26.6#7 of 365
Résumé+18.99#9 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winHouston (65–55)
Worst lossUCLA (94–95)
Schedule faced+12.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Jackson State W 113–55 +45.2 +12.8
1 vs Florida Gulf Coast W 113–70 +33.6 +9.4
2 vs Texas Tech W 81–77 +7.8 -3.8
2 vs Colgate W 84–65 +33.3 -14.3
3 N Alabama L 86–90 +2.2 -6.2
3 vs Long Island University W 98–58 +33.4 +6.6
4 vs UT Rio Grande Valley W 87–73 +29.2 -15.2
4 N UConn L 61–74 +2.3 -15.3
5 at Tennessee W 75–62 +0.8 +12.2
6 at Ohio State W 88–80 +6.3 +1.7
6 vs Nebraska L 80–83 +8.4 -11.4
8 vs Missouri W 91–48 +16.6 +26.4
9 vs Southern W 90–55 +36.9 -1.9
9 at Penn State W 73–65 +21.3 -13.3
10 vs Rutgers W 81–55 +26.6 -0.6
10 at Iowa W 75–69 +6.1 -0.1
11 at Northwestern W 79–68 +13.5 -2.5
11 vs Minnesota W 77–67 +22.3 -12.3
12 vs Maryland W 89–70 +24.0 -5.0
12 at Purdue W 88–82 -1.7 +7.7
13 vs Washington W 75–66 +18.5 -9.5
13 at Nebraska W 78–69 +2.9 +6.1
14 vs Northwestern W 84–44 +19.0 +21.0
14 at Michigan State L 82–85 -0.5 -2.5
15 vs Wisconsin L 90–92 +9.9 -11.9
15 vs Indiana W 71–51 +15.1 +4.9
16 at USC W 101–65 +15.1 +20.9
16 at UCLA L 94–95 +6.8 -7.8
17 vs Michigan L 70–84 -3.3 -10.7
18 vs Oregon W 80–54 +22.2 +3.8
18 at Maryland W 78–72 +18.6 -12.6
19 N Wisconsin L 88–91 +7.1 -10.1
20 N Pennsylvania W 105–70 +27.2 +7.8
20 N VCU W 76–55 +11.5 +9.5
21 N Houston W 65–55 -1.5 +11.5
21 N Iowa W 71–59 +8.8 +3.2
22 N UConn L 62–71 +2.3 -11.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #2 of 326 (37-2)2005–06: #8 of 326 (26-7)2006–07: #35 of 326 (23-12)2007–08: #76 of 328 (16-19)2008–09: #36 of 330 (24-10)2009–10: #80 of 335 (21-15)2010–11: #50 of 346 (20-14)2011–12: #138 of 345 (15-15)2012–13: #58 of 347 (21-12)2013–14: #87 of 351 (20-15)2014–15: #72 of 351 (19-14)2015–16: #186 of 351 (15-19)2016–17: #91 of 351 (19-15)2017–18: #140 of 351 (14-18)2018–19: #188 of 353 (12-21)2019–20: #51 of 353 (20-10)2020–21: #5 of 347 (24-7)2021–22: #15 of 358 (23-10)2022–23: #25 of 363 (20-13)2023–24: #12 of 362 (29-9)2024–25: #16 of 364 (22-13)2025–26: #7 of 365 (28-9) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 7 of 365 28–9 26.60 Power
2024–25 16 of 364 22–13 19.19 Power
2023–24 12 of 362 29–9 19.40 Power
2022–23 25 of 363 20–13 13.73 Power
2021–22 15 of 358 23–10 16.34 Power
2020–21 5 of 347 24–7 18.72 Power
2019–20 51 of 353 20–10 90.15 MRI
2018–19 188 of 353 12–21 24.01 MRI
2017–18 140 of 351 14–18 50.71 MRI
2016–17 91 of 351 19–15 75.24 MRI
2015–16 186 of 351 15–19 28.03 MRI
2014–15 72 of 351 19–14 85.43 MRI
2013–14 87 of 351 20–15 76.30 MRI
2012–13 58 of 347 21–12 96.52 MRI
2011–12 138 of 345 15–15 48.82 MRI
2010–11 50 of 346 20–14 105.23 MRI
2009–10 80 of 335 21–15 83.79 MRI
2008–09 36 of 330 24–10 117.20 MRI
2007–08 76 of 328 16–19 80.72 MRI
2006–07 35 of 326 23–12 124.05 MRI
2005–06 8 of 326 26–7 160.48 MRI
2004–05 2 of 326 37–2 242.48 MRI