The MRI
2025–26 · Final
MRI Champion · 2 basketball titles 2009–10, 2024–25

Duke

ACC · 35–3

Power+31.8#2 of 365
Résumé+25.46#3 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winMichigan (68–63)
Worst lossNorth Carolina (68–71)
Schedule faced+11.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Texas W 75–60 +16.1 -1.1
1 vs Western Carolina W 95–54 +39.5 +1.5
2 at Army W 114–59 +43.7 +11.3
2 vs Indiana State W 100–62 +36.6 +1.4
3 N Kansas W 78–66 +11.5 +0.5
3 vs Niagara W 100–42 +49.0 +9.0
3 vs Howard W 93–56 +36.4 +0.6
4 N Arkansas W 80–71 +10.8 -1.8
5 vs Florida W 67–66 +5.4 -4.4
5 at Michigan State W 66–60 +4.7 +1.3
7 vs Lipscomb W 97–73 +33.9 -9.9
7 N Texas Tech L 81–82 +10.3 -11.3
9 vs Georgia Tech W 85–79 +35.7 -29.7
9 at Florida State W 91–87 +20.4 -16.4
10 at Louisville W 84–73 +9.2 +1.8
10 vs SMU W 82–75 +20.6 -13.6
11 at California W 71–56 +22.0 -7.0
11 at Stanford W 80–50 +20.0 +10.0
12 vs Wake Forest W 90–69 +25.7 -4.7
13 vs Louisville W 83–52 +14.6 +16.4
13 at Virginia Tech W 72–58 +20.1 -6.1
14 vs Boston College W 67–49 +36.1 -18.1
14 at North Carolina L 68–71 +11.4 -14.4
15 at Pittsburgh W 70–54 +23.5 -7.5
15 vs Clemson W 67–54 +18.6 -5.6
16 vs Syracuse W 101–64 +28.5 +8.5
16 N Michigan W 68–63 -0.8 +5.8
17 at Notre Dame W 100–56 +24.1 +19.9
17 vs Virginia W 77–51 +16.3 +9.7
18 at NC State W 93–64 +15.3 +13.7
18 vs North Carolina W 76–61 +16.8 -1.8
19 N Florida State W 80–79 +23.1 -22.1
19 N Clemson W 73–61 +15.9 -3.9
19 N Virginia W 74–70 +13.5 -9.5
20 N Siena W 71–65 +32.6 -26.6
20 N TCU W 81–58 +18.9 +4.1
21 N St. John's W 80–75 +8.3 -3.3
21 N UConn L 72–73 +7.5 -8.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #1 in 2024–25. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 50 2004–05: #8 of 326 (26-6)2005–06: #4 of 326 (32-4)2006–07: #15 of 326 (22-11)2007–08: #7 of 328 (28-6)2008–09: #6 of 330 (30-7)2009–10: #1 of 335 (35-5)2010–11: #3 of 346 (32-5)2011–12: #19 of 345 (27-7)2012–13: #6 of 347 (27-5)2013–14: #9 of 351 (26-9)2014–15: #4 of 351 (35-4)2015–16: #24 of 351 (25-11)2016–17: #21 of 351 (28-9)2017–18: #4 of 351 (28-8)2018–19: #2 of 353 (32-6)2019–20: #4 of 353 (25-6)2020–21: #42 of 347 (13-11)2021–22: #11 of 358 (32-7)2022–23: #15 of 363 (27-9)2023–24: #11 of 362 (27-9)2024–25: #1 of 364 (35-4)2025–26: #2 of 365 (35-3) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 50 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 2 of 365 35–3 31.81 Power
2024–25 1 of 364 35–4 30.50 Power
2023–24 11 of 362 27–9 19.88 Power
2022–23 15 of 363 27–9 16.21 Power
2021–22 11 of 358 32–7 19.07 Power
2020–21 42 of 347 13–11 10.50 Power
2019–20 4 of 353 25–6 176.04 MRI
2018–19 2 of 353 32–6 219.66 MRI
2017–18 4 of 351 28–8 200.72 MRI
2016–17 21 of 351 28–9 149.67 MRI
2015–16 24 of 351 25–11 139.88 MRI
2014–15 4 of 351 35–4 237.23 MRI
2013–14 9 of 351 26–9 171.00 MRI
2012–13 6 of 347 27–5 177.57 MRI
2011–12 19 of 345 27–7 143.02 MRI
2010–11 3 of 346 32–5 217.96 MRI
2009–10 1 of 335 35–5 260.24 MRI
2008–09 6 of 330 30–7 192.47 MRI
2007–08 7 of 328 28–6 176.51 MRI
2006–07 15 of 326 22–11 140.99 MRI
2005–06 4 of 326 32–4 189.67 MRI
2004–05 8 of 326 26–6 161.52 MRI