The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Jackson State

SWAC · 12–21

Power-15.9#348 of 365
Résumé-8.85#680 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winBethune-Cookman (91–86)
Worst lossAlcorn State (65–83)
Schedule faced-4.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Illinois L 55–113 -45.2 -12.8
1 at Louisville L 70–106 -38.5 +2.5
2 at Louisiana Tech L 51–68 -17.9 +0.9
3 at Auburn L 66–112 -37.1 -8.9
3 at Arkansas L 61–115 -39.6 -14.4
4 vs Winthrop L 62–80 -16.1 -1.9
4 at Louisiana W 51–45 -6.6 +12.6
5 at Kennesaw State L 73–88 -21.1 +6.1
6 at Houston L 38–80 -46.7 +4.7
6 at Northwestern L 53–93 -29.0 -11.0
7 N Hampton L 77–84 -8.6 +1.6
7 N Norfolk State L 72–82 -8.1 -1.9
9 at TCU L 64–115 -31.6 -19.4
9 vs Alcorn State W 89–86 +4.7 -1.7
10 at Alabama State W 75–64 -6.2 +17.2
11 at Alabama A&M L 91–100 -5.9 -3.1
11 vs Prairie View A&M W 82–78 -2.1 +6.1
12 vs Texas Southern W 94–89 -1.4 +6.4
12 at Bethune-Cookman L 48–85 -12.0 -25.0
13 at Florida A&M W 66–65 -5.8 +6.8
13 vs Grambling L 66–69 -3.4 +0.4
14 vs Southern L 91–96 -5.6 +0.6
14 at Mississippi Valley State W 97–81 +11.3 +4.7
15 at Arkansas-Pine Bluff L 63–84 -3.5 -17.5
15 vs Florida A&M W 80–60 -0.3 +20.3
16 vs Bethune-Cookman W 91–86 -6.5 +11.5
16 at Alcorn State L 65–83 -0.8 -17.2
17 at Prairie View A&M L 76–85 -7.6 -1.4
17 at Texas Southern L 57–82 -6.9 -18.1
18 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 81–78 +1.9 +1.1
18 vs Mississippi Valley State W 85–77 +16.7 -8.7
19 N Grambling W 68–65 -6.2 +9.2
19 N Florida A&M L 60–70 -3.0 -7.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #174 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #248 of 326 (15-17)2005–06: #250 of 326 (15-17)2006–07: #191 of 326 (21-14)2007–08: #276 of 328 (14-20)2008–09: #198 of 330 (18-15)2009–10: #214 of 335 (19-13)2010–11: #192 of 346 (17-15)2011–12: #313 of 345 (7-24)2012–13: #305 of 347 (11-18)2013–14: #260 of 351 (11-20)2014–15: #264 of 351 (11-21)2015–16: #174 of 351 (20-16)2016–17: #260 of 351 (14-18)2017–18: #303 of 351 (12-20)2018–19: #285 of 353 (11-19)2019–20: #261 of 353 (13-17)2020–21: #241 of 347 (12-6)2021–22: #294 of 358 (11-19)2022–23: #313 of 363 (14-19)2023–24: #310 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #265 of 364 (16-18)2025–26: #348 of 365 (12-21) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 348 of 365 12–21 -15.87 Power
2024–25 265 of 364 16–18 -6.60 Power
2023–24 310 of 362 15–17 -10.05 Power
2022–23 313 of 363 14–19 -9.92 Power
2021–22 294 of 358 11–19 -8.59 Power
2020–21 241 of 347 12–6 -5.13 Power
2019–20 261 of 353 13–17 -5.41 MRI
2018–19 285 of 353 11–19 -21.04 MRI
2017–18 303 of 351 12–20 -28.13 MRI
2016–17 260 of 351 14–18 -4.13 MRI
2015–16 174 of 351 20–16 37.30 MRI
2014–15 264 of 351 11–21 -2.29 MRI
2013–14 260 of 351 11–20 -0.52 MRI
2012–13 305 of 347 11–18 -37.03 MRI
2011–12 313 of 345 7–24 -46.39 MRI
2010–11 192 of 346 17–15 27.49 MRI
2009–10 214 of 335 19–13 13.66 MRI
2008–09 198 of 330 18–15 22.14 MRI
2007–08 276 of 328 14–20 -19.27 MRI
2006–07 191 of 326 21–14 21.52 MRI
2005–06 250 of 326 15–17 -5.47 MRI
2004–05 248 of 326 15–17 -3.63 MRI