The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Arkansas

SEC · 28–9

Power+21.0#17 of 365
Résumé+19.43#8 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTennessee (86–75)
Worst lossGeorgia (76–90)
Schedule faced+12.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Southern W 109–77 +31.3 +0.7
1 at Michigan State L 66–69 -6.1 +3.1
2 vs Central Arkansas W 93–56 +25.6 +11.4
2 vs Samford W 79–75 +23.0 -19.0
3 vs Winthrop W 84–83 +20.8 -19.8
3 vs Jackson State W 115–61 +39.6 +14.4
4 N Duke L 71–80 -10.8 +1.8
5 vs Louisville W 89–80 +3.9 +5.1
5 N Fresno State W 82–58 +22.2 +1.8
6 N Texas Tech W 93–86 -0.5 +7.5
7 vs Queens University W 108–80 +25.6 +2.4
7 N Houston L 85–94 -7.1 -1.9
9 vs James Madison W 103–74 +25.8 +3.2
9 vs Tennessee W 86–75 +0.7 +10.3
10 at Ole Miss W 94–87 +8.6 -1.6
10 at Auburn L 73–95 -0.2 -21.8
11 vs South Carolina W 108–74 +18.3 +15.7
11 at Georgia L 76–90 +1.8 -15.8
12 vs Vanderbilt W 93–68 +2.2 +22.8
12 vs LSU W 85–81 +14.2 -10.2
13 at Oklahoma W 83–79 +4.4 -0.4
13 vs Kentucky L 77–85 +5.6 -13.6
14 at Mississippi State W 88–68 +12.1 +7.9
15 at LSU W 91–62 +8.8 +20.2
15 vs Auburn W 88–75 +5.2 +7.8
16 at Alabama L 115–117 -6.1 +4.1
16 vs Missouri W 94–86 +11.1 -3.1
17 vs Texas A&M W 99–84 +8.2 +6.8
17 at Florida L 77–111 -10.8 -23.2
18 vs Texas W 105–85 +8.1 +11.9
18 at Missouri W 88–84 +5.6 -1.6
19 N Oklahoma W 82–79 +7.1 -4.1
19 N Ole Miss W 93–90 +11.3 -8.3
19 N Vanderbilt W 86–75 -0.6 +11.6
20 N Hawai'i W 97–78 +17.9 +1.1
20 N High Point W 94–88 +10.2 -4.2
21 N Arizona L 88–109 -10.3 -10.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #13 in 2020–21. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #61 of 326 (17-12)2005–06: #32 of 326 (22-10)2006–07: #50 of 326 (21-14)2007–08: #32 of 328 (23-12)2008–09: #128 of 330 (14-16)2009–10: #172 of 335 (14-18)2010–11: #120 of 346 (18-13)2011–12: #116 of 345 (18-14)2012–13: #75 of 347 (19-13)2013–14: #42 of 351 (22-12)2014–15: #25 of 351 (27-9)2015–16: #87 of 351 (16-16)2016–17: #40 of 351 (26-10)2017–18: #55 of 351 (23-12)2018–19: #105 of 353 (18-16)2019–20: #54 of 353 (20-12)2020–21: #13 of 347 (25-7)2021–22: #17 of 358 (28-9)2022–23: #17 of 363 (22-14)2023–24: #99 of 362 (16-17)2024–25: #46 of 364 (22-14)2025–26: #17 of 365 (28-9) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 17 of 365 28–9 21.04 Power
2024–25 46 of 364 22–14 12.61 Power
2023–24 99 of 362 16–17 5.76 Power
2022–23 17 of 363 22–14 15.60 Power
2021–22 17 of 358 28–9 15.80 Power
2020–21 13 of 347 25–7 15.29 Power
2019–20 54 of 353 20–12 89.35 MRI
2018–19 105 of 353 18–16 61.84 MRI
2017–18 55 of 351 23–12 102.96 MRI
2016–17 40 of 351 26–10 114.34 MRI
2015–16 87 of 351 16–16 78.43 MRI
2014–15 25 of 351 27–9 134.04 MRI
2013–14 42 of 351 22–12 112.34 MRI
2012–13 75 of 347 19–13 76.09 MRI
2011–12 116 of 345 18–14 63.36 MRI
2010–11 120 of 346 18–13 59.25 MRI
2009–10 172 of 335 14–18 34.37 MRI
2008–09 128 of 330 14–16 50.33 MRI
2007–08 32 of 328 23–12 124.44 MRI
2006–07 50 of 326 21–14 108.40 MRI
2005–06 32 of 326 22–10 113.55 MRI
2004–05 61 of 326 17–12 87.16 MRI