The MRI
2025–26 · Final

East Tennessee State

SoCon · 23–11

Power+3.4#125 of 365
Résumé+0.98#146 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winFurman (75–71)
Worst lossPresbyterian (64–68)
Schedule faced-6.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Converse University non-D1 W 102–50 +44.0 +8.0
1 at Presbyterian L 64–68 +6.9 -10.9
2 vs Northern Kentucky W 75–63 +6.2 +5.8
2 at North Alabama W 78–74 +13.4 -9.4
3 vs Morehead State W 77–62 +14.6 +0.4
3 vs UL Monroe W 97–55 +24.9 +17.1
4 vs Central Arkansas W 80–57 +7.9 +15.1
5 at Dayton L 71–88 -9.2 -7.8
5 vs South Alabama W 91–65 +6.0 +20.0
5 vs Tusculum non-D1 W 78–62 +44.0 -28.0
6 at Austin Peay L 75–76 +1.0 -2.0
7 at North Carolina L 58–77 -17.0 -2.0
7 vs Jacksonville State L 75–81 +7.0 -13.0
9 at The Citadel W 74–49 +16.4 +8.6
9 vs Mercer W 77–71 +5.4 +0.6
10 vs VMI W 81–67 +24.1 -10.1
10 vs UNC Greensboro W 86–60 +13.6 +12.4
11 at Western Carolina L 68–72 +5.6 -9.6
11 at Samford W 76–75 -0.1 +1.1
12 at Chattanooga W 67–66 +5.4 -4.4
12 vs The Citadel W 84–55 +21.9 +7.1
13 vs Western Carolina L 88–90 +11.1 -13.1
14 at Wofford W 86–72 +3.2 +10.8
14 vs Furman W 75–71 +4.5 -0.5
14 at VMI W 87–70 +18.6 -1.6
15 vs Chattanooga W 73–61 +10.9 +1.1
15 vs Samford L 72–82 +5.3 -15.3
16 at Furman W 78–69 -1.0 +9.9
16 at UNC Greensboro W 87–75 +8.1 +3.9
17 vs Wofford L 69–72 +8.7 -11.7
17 at Mercer L 76–82 -0.1 -5.9
18 N The Citadel W 83–76 +19.1 -12.1
18 N Western Carolina W 69–67 +8.3 -6.3
19 N Furman L 61–76 +1.8 -16.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #19 in 2019–20. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #254 of 326 (10-19)2005–06: #134 of 326 (15-13)2006–07: #103 of 326 (24-10)2007–08: #156 of 328 (19-13)2008–09: #59 of 330 (23-11)2009–10: #118 of 335 (20-15)2010–11: #83 of 346 (24-12)2011–12: #133 of 345 (17-14)2012–13: #325 of 347 (9-22)2013–14: #201 of 351 (19-16)2014–15: #173 of 351 (16-14)2015–16: #141 of 351 (24-12)2016–17: #37 of 351 (27-8)2017–18: #46 of 351 (25-8)2018–19: #41 of 353 (22-10)2019–20: #19 of 353 (27-4)2020–21: #88 of 347 (13-12)2021–22: #156 of 358 (15-17)2022–23: #212 of 363 (12-20)2023–24: #179 of 362 (19-16)2024–25: #139 of 364 (19-13)2025–26: #125 of 365 (23-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 125 of 365 23–11 3.38 Power
2024–25 139 of 364 19–13 1.87 Power
2023–24 179 of 362 19–16 -1.10 Power
2022–23 212 of 363 12–20 -2.63 Power
2021–22 156 of 358 15–17 1.22 Power
2020–21 88 of 347 13–12 7.02 Power
2019–20 19 of 353 27–4 118.53 MRI
2018–19 41 of 353 22–10 102.90 MRI
2017–18 46 of 351 25–8 108.80 MRI
2016–17 37 of 351 27–8 115.28 MRI
2015–16 141 of 351 24–12 53.35 MRI
2014–15 173 of 351 16–14 34.38 MRI
2013–14 201 of 351 19–16 25.80 MRI
2012–13 325 of 347 9–22 -61.24 MRI
2011–12 133 of 345 17–14 51.15 MRI
2010–11 83 of 346 24–12 78.91 MRI
2009–10 118 of 335 20–15 60.65 MRI
2008–09 59 of 330 23–11 95.53 MRI
2007–08 156 of 328 19–13 37.68 MRI
2006–07 103 of 326 24–10 64.50 MRI
2005–06 134 of 326 15–13 44.08 MRI
2004–05 254 of 326 10–19 -7.01 MRI