The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Colorado

Big 12 · 17–16

Power+8.6#78 of 365
Résumé+7.18#71 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTCU (87–61)
Worst lossNorthern Colorado (81–86)
Schedule faced+9.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Montana State W 84–78 +9.7 -3.7
1 vs Eastern Washington W 102–97 +14.7 -9.7
2 vs Providence W 97–88 +3.1 +5.9
3 vs Alabama State W 94–66 +23.7 +4.3
3 vs UC Davis W 95–79 +12.9 +3.1
4 N San Francisco W 79–69 +4.5 +5.5
4 N Washington W 81–68 -2.2 +15.2
5 vs California Baptist W 78–70 +7.6 +0.4
5 at Colorado State L 86–91 -2.8 -2.2
6 vs UTSA W 88–64 +26.0 -2.0
7 vs Portland State W 84–73 +10.9 +0.1
7 N Stanford L 68–77 -0.5 -8.5
8 vs Northern Colorado L 81–86 +9.4 -14.4
9 at Arizona State W 95–89 -2.5 +8.5
10 vs Utah W 85–73 +8.4 +3.6
10 vs Texas Tech L 71–73 -10.2 +8.2
11 at Cincinnati L 68–77 -8.6 -0.4
11 at West Virginia L 61–72 -6.0 -5.0
12 vs Kansas L 69–75 -9.0 +3.0
12 vs UCF L 86–95 +0.0 -9.0
13 at Iowa State L 67–97 -20.8 -9.2
13 vs TCU W 87–61 -1.6 +27.6
14 at Baylor L 67–86 -7.6 -11.4
14 vs Arizona State W 78–70 +3.0 +5.0
15 at Texas Tech L 44–78 -15.7 -18.3
15 at BYU L 86–90 -13.4 +9.4
16 vs Oklahoma State W 83–69 +3.5 +10.5
17 vs Kansas State W 79–70 +6.4 +2.6
17 at Houston L 62–102 -22.3 -17.7
18 at Utah W 92–78 +2.9 +11.1
18 vs Arizona L 79–89 -20.1 +10.1
19 N Oklahoma State L 83–92 +0.8 -9.8
22 N Oklahoma L 86–90 -5.3 +1.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2020–21. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #182 of 326 (13-16)2005–06: #58 of 326 (20-10)2006–07: #277 of 326 (7-20)2007–08: #200 of 328 (12-20)2008–09: #259 of 330 (9-22)2009–10: #181 of 335 (15-16)2010–11: #54 of 346 (24-14)2011–12: #98 of 345 (24-12)2012–13: #57 of 347 (21-11)2013–14: #58 of 351 (23-12)2014–15: #99 of 351 (16-18)2015–16: #69 of 351 (22-12)2016–17: #87 of 351 (19-15)2017–18: #144 of 351 (17-15)2018–19: #37 of 353 (23-13)2019–20: #26 of 353 (21-11)2020–21: #11 of 347 (23-9)2021–22: #60 of 358 (21-12)2022–23: #76 of 363 (18-17)2023–24: #25 of 362 (26-11)2024–25: #83 of 364 (14-21)2025–26: #78 of 365 (17-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 78 of 365 17–16 8.58 Power
2024–25 83 of 364 14–21 7.40 Power
2023–24 25 of 362 26–11 14.69 Power
2022–23 76 of 363 18–17 8.87 Power
2021–22 60 of 358 21–12 9.94 Power
2020–21 11 of 347 23–9 16.26 Power
2019–20 26 of 353 21–11 113.12 MRI
2018–19 37 of 353 23–13 105.65 MRI
2017–18 144 of 351 17–15 50.03 MRI
2016–17 87 of 351 19–15 78.51 MRI
2015–16 69 of 351 22–12 94.31 MRI
2014–15 99 of 351 16–18 69.55 MRI
2013–14 58 of 351 23–12 95.13 MRI
2012–13 57 of 347 21–11 96.99 MRI
2011–12 98 of 345 24–12 71.88 MRI
2010–11 54 of 346 24–14 103.29 MRI
2009–10 181 of 335 15–16 30.15 MRI
2008–09 259 of 330 9–22 -7.09 MRI
2007–08 200 of 328 12–20 17.12 MRI
2006–07 277 of 326 7–20 -21.92 MRI
2005–06 58 of 326 20–10 93.76 MRI
2004–05 182 of 326 13–16 24.74 MRI