The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Georgia

SEC · 22–11

Power+16.5#33 of 365
Résumé+11.61#39 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winAlabama (98–88)
Worst lossOle Miss (95–97)
Schedule faced+8.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Bellarmine W 104–59 +28.6 +16.4
1 vs Maryland Eastern Shore W 94–29 +34.7 +30.3
1 vs Morehead State W 120–81 +27.7 +11.3
2 vs Georgia Tech W 92–87 +20.4 -15.4
3 vs Florida A&M W 87–57 +32.0 -2.0
3 N Xavier W 78–77 +9.7 -8.7
3 N Clemson L 94–97 +0.6 -3.6
4 vs Tennessee Tech W 123–81 +29.9 +12.1
5 at Florida State W 107–73 +5.0 +29.0
6 N Cincinnati W 84–65 +2.1 +16.9
7 vs Western Carolina W 112–82 +24.2 +5.8
8 vs West Georgia W 103–74 +31.0 -2.0
9 vs Long Island University W 89–74 +23.3 -8.3
9 vs Auburn W 104–100 +0.7 +3.3
10 at Florida L 77–92 -15.3 +0.3
10 at South Carolina W 75–70 +8.3 -3.3
11 vs Ole Miss L 95–97 +9.5 -11.5
11 vs Arkansas W 90–76 -1.8 +15.8
12 at Missouri W 74–72 +1.0 +1.0
12 at Texas L 67–87 -1.9 -18.1
13 vs Tennessee L 85–86 -3.9 +2.9
13 vs Texas A&M L 77–92 +3.6 -18.6
14 at LSU W 83–71 +4.2 +7.8
15 vs Florida L 66–86 -9.9 -10.1
15 at Oklahoma L 78–94 -0.1 -15.9
16 at Kentucky W 86–78 -4.4 +12.4
16 vs Texas W 91–80 +3.5 +7.5
17 at Vanderbilt L 80–88 -7.9 -0.1
17 vs South Carolina W 87–68 +13.8 +5.2
18 vs Alabama W 98–88 -5.2 +15.2
18 at Mississippi State W 102–96 +7.6 -1.6
19 N Ole Miss L 72–76 +6.7 -10.7
20 N Saint Louis L 77–102 -0.0 -25.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #33 in 2025–26. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #266 of 326 (8-20)2005–06: #150 of 326 (15-15)2006–07: #53 of 326 (19-14)2007–08: #122 of 328 (17-17)2008–09: #249 of 330 (12-20)2009–10: #138 of 335 (14-17)2010–11: #69 of 346 (21-12)2011–12: #141 of 345 (15-17)2012–13: #142 of 347 (15-17)2013–14: #81 of 351 (20-14)2014–15: #64 of 351 (21-12)2015–16: #109 of 351 (20-14)2016–17: #102 of 351 (19-15)2017–18: #119 of 351 (18-15)2018–19: #206 of 353 (11-21)2019–20: #117 of 353 (15-16)2020–21: #136 of 347 (14-12)2021–22: #235 of 358 (6-26)2022–23: #184 of 363 (16-16)2023–24: #105 of 362 (20-17)2024–25: #51 of 364 (20-13)2025–26: #33 of 365 (22-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 33 of 365 22–11 16.48 Power
2024–25 51 of 364 20–13 12.13 Power
2023–24 105 of 362 20–17 5.17 Power
2022–23 184 of 363 16–16 -0.49 Power
2021–22 235 of 358 6–26 -4.52 Power
2020–21 136 of 347 14–12 2.18 Power
2019–20 117 of 353 15–16 55.15 MRI
2018–19 206 of 353 11–21 14.81 MRI
2017–18 119 of 351 18–15 62.65 MRI
2016–17 102 of 351 19–15 66.86 MRI
2015–16 109 of 351 20–14 66.87 MRI
2014–15 64 of 351 21–12 88.25 MRI
2013–14 81 of 351 20–14 80.15 MRI
2012–13 142 of 347 15–17 41.20 MRI
2011–12 141 of 345 15–17 48.35 MRI
2010–11 69 of 346 21–12 87.46 MRI
2009–10 138 of 335 14–17 50.59 MRI
2008–09 249 of 330 12–20 -3.42 MRI
2007–08 122 of 328 17–17 56.94 MRI
2006–07 53 of 326 19–14 101.84 MRI
2005–06 150 of 326 15–15 38.95 MRI
2004–05 266 of 326 8–20 -11.52 MRI