The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Lipscomb

ASUN · 19–13

Power+0.7#154 of 365
Résumé-1.39#507 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winAustin Peay (82–78)
Worst lossStetson (83–91)
Schedule faced-5.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Vanderbilt L 61–105 -23.7 -20.3
1 at Mercer L 77–92 -2.8 -12.2
2 at UNC Asheville L 64–69 +2.0 -7.0
2 vs Bryan (TN) non-D1 W 98–53 +41.3 +3.7
3 at Belmont L 68–75 -12.4 +5.4
3 vs Western Carolina W 83–62 +8.3 +12.7
4 at Marshall W 90–67 -1.0 +24.0
4 at Southeast Missouri State W 88–77 +1.1 +9.9
5 vs Tennessee Tech W 83–80 +14.1 -11.1
5 vs Alabama A&M W 92–58 +16.1 +17.9
7 at Duke L 73–97 -33.9 +9.9
7 vs Blue Mountain non-D1 W 123–60 +41.3 +21.7
9 at Cincinnati L 62–89 -16.5 -10.5
9 vs Jacksonville W 76–57 +12.0 +7.0
9 vs North Florida W 82–74 +16.8 -8.8
10 at Stetson L 83–91 +10.5 -18.5
10 at Florida Gulf Coast W 84–77 +2.2 +4.8
11 vs Bellarmine W 81–71 +12.8 -2.8
11 vs Austin Peay W 82–78 +3.7 +0.3
12 vs Stetson W 79–74 +16.0 -11.0
12 vs Florida Gulf Coast W 86–71 +7.6 +7.4
13 at Jacksonville L 65–70 +6.5 -11.5
13 at North Florida W 100–94 +11.3 -5.3
14 at Austin Peay L 76–87 -1.8 -9.2
14 vs Central Arkansas L 78–86 +5.2 -13.2
15 vs Eastern Kentucky W 75–61 +11.0 +3.0
15 at Queens University L 81–87 -0.2 -5.8
16 at Bellarmine W 75–72 +7.3 -4.3
16 vs North Alabama W 73–51 +16.2 +5.8
17 at West Georgia L 77–84 +9.7 -16.7
17 at Eastern Kentucky W 80–77 +5.5 -2.5
18 N Florida Gulf Coast L 53–77 +4.9 -28.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #28 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #216 of 326 (16-12)2005–06: #97 of 326 (21-11)2006–07: #144 of 326 (18-13)2007–08: #166 of 328 (15-16)2008–09: #112 of 330 (17-14)2009–10: #147 of 335 (17-13)2010–11: #153 of 346 (17-13)2011–12: #253 of 345 (11-18)2012–13: #278 of 347 (11-18)2013–14: #242 of 351 (15-15)2014–15: #271 of 351 (14-17)2015–16: #266 of 351 (12-21)2016–17: #138 of 351 (20-13)2017–18: #109 of 351 (23-10)2018–19: #28 of 353 (27-8)2019–20: #223 of 353 (14-16)2020–21: #202 of 347 (15-12)2021–22: #252 of 358 (14-19)2022–23: #157 of 363 (20-13)2023–24: #156 of 362 (20-12)2024–25: #87 of 364 (25-10)2025–26: #154 of 365 (19-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 154 of 365 19–13 0.66 Power
2024–25 87 of 364 25–10 6.62 Power
2023–24 156 of 362 20–12 1.40 Power
2022–23 157 of 363 20–13 0.56 Power
2021–22 252 of 358 14–19 -5.96 Power
2020–21 202 of 347 15–12 -2.31 Power
2019–20 223 of 353 14–16 6.44 MRI
2018–19 28 of 353 27–8 125.75 MRI
2017–18 109 of 351 23–10 65.25 MRI
2016–17 138 of 351 20–13 51.38 MRI
2015–16 266 of 351 12–21 -12.14 MRI
2014–15 271 of 351 14–17 -6.77 MRI
2013–14 242 of 351 15–15 8.27 MRI
2012–13 278 of 347 11–18 -22.91 MRI
2011–12 253 of 345 11–18 -5.38 MRI
2010–11 153 of 346 17–13 41.91 MRI
2009–10 147 of 335 17–13 47.66 MRI
2008–09 112 of 330 17–14 61.19 MRI
2007–08 166 of 328 15–16 33.66 MRI
2006–07 144 of 326 18–13 42.90 MRI
2005–06 97 of 326 21–11 66.04 MRI
2004–05 216 of 326 16–12 13.34 MRI