The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Hofstra

CAA · 24–11

Power+6.4#94 of 365
Résumé+4.54#101 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSyracuse (70–69)
Worst lossNorth Carolina A&T (78–79)
Schedule faced-3.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at UCF L 78–82 -7.6 +3.6
1 at Iona L 73–81 +8.5 -16.5
2 vs Molloy non-D1 W 95–61 +47.0 -13.0
2 at Bucknell W 83–77 +16.7 -10.7
3 at Temple L 76–81 +3.6 -8.6
4 N La Salle W 63–58 +12.4 -7.4
4 N Merrimack W 78–58 +6.8 +13.2
4 at Pennsylvania W 77–60 +4.3 +12.7
5 at Columbia L 70–72 +4.9 -6.9
5 at Pittsburgh W 80–73 -1.9 +8.9
6 vs Old Westbury non-D1 W 92–23 +47.0 +22.0
6 at Syracuse W 70–69 -2.4 +3.4
7 vs Quinnipiac W 74–66 +10.8 -2.8
9 vs Campbell W 86–72 +11.7 +2.3
9 at Drexel W 70–67 +7.2 -4.2
10 at Towson W 78–67 +2.7 +8.3
10 vs Monmouth W 67–64 +11.2 -8.2
11 at Stony Brook L 71–76 +10.4 -15.4
11 vs Elon L 85–89 +13.8 -17.8
12 at North Carolina A&T L 78–79 +14.6 -15.6
12 at William & Mary L 82–89 +2.8 -9.8
13 vs Charleston L 64–66 +8.7 -10.7
13 at Monmouth W 73–57 +5.7 +10.3
14 vs Northeastern W 80–63 +18.2 -1.2
14 vs Towson W 71–49 +8.1 +13.9
15 at Charleston W 66–62 +3.3 +0.7
15 at UNC Wilmington L 66–70 -1.3 -2.7
16 vs Hampton W 79–43 +16.4 +19.6
16 at Northeastern W 82–68 +12.8 +1.2
17 vs Stony Brook W 67–58 +15.9 -6.9
18 vs Drexel W 62–51 +12.6 -1.6
19 N William & Mary W 92–61 +5.5 +25.5
19 N Towson W 68–65 +5.4 -2.4
19 N Monmouth W 75–69 +8.5 -2.5
20 N Alabama L 70–90 -18.0 -2.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #49 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #88 of 326 (21-9)2005–06: #64 of 326 (26-7)2006–07: #116 of 326 (22-10)2007–08: #228 of 328 (12-18)2008–09: #160 of 330 (21-11)2009–10: #124 of 335 (19-15)2010–11: #156 of 346 (21-12)2011–12: #195 of 345 (10-21)2012–13: #322 of 347 (6-25)2013–14: #271 of 351 (10-23)2014–15: #69 of 351 (20-14)2015–16: #90 of 351 (24-10)2016–17: #184 of 351 (15-17)2017–18: #143 of 351 (19-12)2018–19: #49 of 353 (26-8)2019–20: #58 of 353 (25-8)2020–21: #158 of 347 (13-10)2021–22: #134 of 358 (21-11)2022–23: #89 of 363 (25-10)2023–24: #107 of 362 (20-13)2024–25: #187 of 364 (15-18)2025–26: #94 of 365 (24-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 94 of 365 24–11 6.40 Power
2024–25 187 of 364 15–18 -1.35 Power
2023–24 107 of 362 20–13 4.97 Power
2022–23 89 of 363 25–10 7.11 Power
2021–22 134 of 358 21–11 3.16 Power
2020–21 158 of 347 13–10 0.68 Power
2019–20 58 of 353 25–8 88.54 MRI
2018–19 49 of 353 26–8 98.65 MRI
2017–18 143 of 351 19–12 50.11 MRI
2016–17 184 of 351 15–17 34.73 MRI
2015–16 90 of 351 24–10 77.38 MRI
2014–15 69 of 351 20–14 86.20 MRI
2013–14 271 of 351 10–23 -8.52 MRI
2012–13 322 of 347 6–25 -57.88 MRI
2011–12 195 of 345 10–21 21.74 MRI
2010–11 156 of 346 21–12 41.62 MRI
2009–10 124 of 335 19–15 55.73 MRI
2008–09 160 of 330 21–11 37.67 MRI
2007–08 228 of 328 12–18 3.69 MRI
2006–07 116 of 326 22–10 58.42 MRI
2005–06 64 of 326 26–7 89.73 MRI
2004–05 88 of 326 21–9 69.84 MRI