The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Austin Peay

ASUN · 22–9

Power-0.3#168 of 365
Résumé+1.25#140 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winEast Tennessee State (76–75)
Worst lossBellarmine (97–111)
Schedule faced-7.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-18.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Bryan (TN) non-D1 W 128–47 +40.3 +40.7
1 at Air Force W 74–54 +15.2 +4.8
2 at Wyoming L 65–79 -7.6 -6.4
2 at UNC Greensboro W 69–63 +4.4 +1.6
3 at Ole Miss L 65–72 -12.8 +5.8
3 at Tulsa L 75–84 -12.6 +3.6
4 vs Northern Illinois W 77–59 +17.3 +0.7
5 at Kent State L 84–96 -5.2 -6.8
5 at UT Rio Grande Valley L 50–63 -3.1 -9.8
6 vs East Tennessee State W 76–75 -1.0 +2.0
8 vs Fisk non-D1 W 110–59 +40.3 +10.7
9 vs North Florida W 102–83 +15.8 +3.2
9 vs Jacksonville W 71–68 +11.0 -8.0
10 at Florida Gulf Coast W 82–71 +1.2 +9.8
10 at Stetson W 81–69 +9.5 +2.5
11 vs Eastern Kentucky W 74–72 +10.0 -8.0
11 at Lipscomb L 78–82 -3.7 -0.3
12 vs Florida Gulf Coast W 83–62 +6.7 +14.3
12 vs Stetson W 73–65 +15.0 -7.0
13 at Eastern Kentucky W 90–82 +4.5 +3.5
13 at West Georgia W 81–78 +8.7 -5.7
14 vs Lipscomb W 87–76 +1.8 +9.2
14 vs North Alabama W 91–62 +15.2 +13.8
15 at Queens University W 95–87 -1.2 +9.2
15 vs Bellarmine W 90–70 +11.8 +8.2
16 at North Florida W 77–76 +10.3 -9.3
16 at Jacksonville W 65–61 +5.6 -1.6
17 vs Central Arkansas L 88–93 +4.2 -9.2
17 at Bellarmine L 97–111 +6.3 -20.3
18 N Stetson W 69–60 +12.3 -3.3
18 N Queens University L 83–90 +1.6 -8.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
7 at Kansas City +15.8 92%

Season by season

Best finish: #78 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #196 of 326 (13-19)2005–06: #165 of 326 (17-14)2006–07: #124 of 326 (21-12)2007–08: #100 of 328 (24-11)2008–09: #181 of 330 (19-14)2009–10: #197 of 335 (17-15)2010–11: #94 of 346 (20-13)2011–12: #223 of 345 (12-20)2012–13: #321 of 347 (6-23)2013–14: #288 of 351 (12-18)2014–15: #297 of 351 (8-22)2015–16: #199 of 351 (18-18)2016–17: #310 of 351 (11-19)2017–18: #135 of 351 (19-15)2018–19: #78 of 353 (20-11)2019–20: #126 of 353 (19-12)2020–21: #172 of 347 (14-13)2021–22: #273 of 358 (12-17)2022–23: #321 of 363 (9-22)2023–24: #241 of 362 (19-16)2024–25: #276 of 364 (14-19)2025–26: #168 of 365 (22-9) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 168 of 365 22–9 -0.32 Power
2024–25 276 of 364 14–19 -7.52 Power
2023–24 241 of 362 19–16 -4.71 Power
2022–23 321 of 363 9–22 -10.56 Power
2021–22 273 of 358 12–17 -7.36 Power
2020–21 172 of 347 14–13 -0.47 Power
2019–20 126 of 353 19–12 51.29 MRI
2018–19 78 of 353 20–11 73.68 MRI
2017–18 135 of 351 19–15 53.42 MRI
2016–17 310 of 351 11–19 -30.92 MRI
2015–16 199 of 351 18–18 22.26 MRI
2014–15 297 of 351 8–22 -24.48 MRI
2013–14 288 of 351 12–18 -15.84 MRI
2012–13 321 of 347 6–23 -57.14 MRI
2011–12 223 of 345 12–20 12.75 MRI
2010–11 94 of 346 20–13 72.04 MRI
2009–10 197 of 335 17–15 19.64 MRI
2008–09 181 of 330 19–14 29.29 MRI
2007–08 100 of 328 24–11 69.44 MRI
2006–07 124 of 326 21–12 53.03 MRI
2005–06 165 of 326 17–14 32.88 MRI
2004–05 196 of 326 13–19 19.72 MRI