Kennesaw State
CUSA · 4–0
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +20.3 avg | × 33% | +6.8 |
| Opponents faced | -18.3 avg | × 33% | -6.1 |
| Preseason prior | +2.1 | × 67% | +1.4 |
| Power | +2.1 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vs | Midway University non-D1 | W 116–57 | +38.2 | +20.8 | +0.5 |
| 2 | vs | Austin Peay | W 71–69 | +4.5 | -2.5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | vs | Winthrop | W 88–79 | +9.1 | -0.1 | +0.1 |
| 3 | vs | LaGrange non-D1 | W 107–54 | +38.2 | +14.8 | +0.5 |
| Preseason prior (67% of the rating) | +1.4 | |||||
| Power | +2.1 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | at | Alabama | -25.5 | 1% |
| 4 | vs | SE Louisiana | +15.3 | 92% |
| 5 | N | Eastern Michigan | +5.4 | 69% |
| 6 | vs | Florida A&M | +25.7 | 99% |
| 10 | vs | Western Kentucky | +3.0 | 61% |
| 10 | vs | Middle Tennessee | +7.7 | 76% |
| 11 | vs | Jacksonville State | +8.9 | 79% |
| 12 | at | Sam Houston | -0.2 | 49% |
Season by season
Best finish: #122 in 2022–23. 17 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 21–14 | #138 of 365 · 2.02 | – |
| 2024–25 | 19–14 | #160 of 364 · -0.05 | – |
| 2023–24 | 15–16 | #206 of 362 · -3.46 | – |
| 2022–23 | 26–9 | #122 of 363 · 3.35 | – |
| 2021–22 | 13–18 | #223 of 358 · -3.43 | – |
| 2020–21 | 5–19 | #330 of 347 · -13.93 | – |
| 2019–20 | 1–28 | – | #351 of 353 · -128.94 |
| 2018–19 | 4–26 | – | #344 of 353 · -87.67 |
| 2017–18 | 10–20 | – | #295 of 351 · -21.24 |
| 2016–17 | 14–18 | – | #236 of 351 · 10.14 |
| 2015–16 | 11–20 | – | #277 of 351 · -15.82 |
| 2014–15 | 10–22 | – | #339 of 351 · -64.94 |
| 2013–14 | 6–25 | – | #342 of 351 · -73.08 |
| 2012–13 | 3–27 | – | #334 of 347 · -73.00 |
| 2011–12 | 3–28 | – | #335 of 345 · -76.67 |
| 2010–11 | 8–23 | – | #321 of 346 · -53.89 |
| 2009–10 | 13–20 | – | #278 of 335 · -17.68 |