The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Kennesaw State

CUSA · 21–14

Power+2.5#136 of 365
Résumé+1.37#138 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLiberty (74–65)
Worst lossOral Roberts (83–91)
Schedule faced-3.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Paine non-D1 W 105–30 +43.1 +31.9
1 at Florida A&M W 92–72 +12.6 +7.4
2 vs Point University non-D1 W 111–60 +43.1 +7.9
2 vs South Florida L 89–108 -7.3 -11.7
4 N Rice W 89–84 +7.7 -2.7
4 N Oral Roberts L 83–91 +13.7 -21.7
4 at Florida Gulf Coast W 102–100 +4.0 -2.0
5 vs Jackson State W 88–73 +21.1 -6.1
5 vs Georgia State W 92–69 +15.1 +7.9
6 vs Southern Wesleyan non-D1 W 121–66 +43.1 +11.9
7 at Middle Tennessee L 67–68 -1.3 +0.3
7 N Alabama L 81–92 -22.0 +11.0
9 at Liberty L 73–81 -6.0 -2.0
9 at Delaware L 52–67 +8.8 -23.8
10 vs Missouri State W 90–80 +8.0 +2.0
10 vs Jacksonville State W 88–82 +6.1 -0.1
11 vs Florida International W 89–86 +7.9 -4.9
11 at Western Kentucky W 81–65 -1.2 +17.2
12 at Sam Houston L 87–93 -4.5 -1.5
12 at Louisiana Tech L 76–82 +0.4 -6.4
13 vs Western Kentucky W 72–69 +4.2 -1.2
13 vs New Mexico State W 76–53 +5.6 +17.4
14 at Jacksonville State L 58–77 +0.6 -19.6
15 vs Middle Tennessee L 87–90 +4.2 -7.2
15 vs Sam Houston L 79–83 +1.0 -5.0
16 at Missouri State W 91–87 +2.5 +1.5
16 vs Louisiana Tech W 58–55 +5.9 -2.9
17 vs Liberty W 74–65 -0.5 +9.5
17 vs Delaware W 90–82 +14.3 -6.3
18 at UTEP L 71–78 +6.0 -13.0
18 at New Mexico State L 76–79 +0.1 -3.1
19 N Western Kentucky W 96–87 +1.5 +7.5
19 N Sam Houston W 79–73 -1.8 +7.8
19 N Louisiana Tech W 71–60 +3.2 +7.8
20 N Gonzaga L 64–73 -22.3 +13.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #134 in 2022–23. 17 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2009–10: #278 of 335 (13-20)2010–11: #321 of 346 (8-23)2011–12: #335 of 345 (3-28)2012–13: #334 of 347 (3-27)2013–14: #342 of 351 (6-25)2014–15: #339 of 351 (10-22)2015–16: #277 of 351 (11-20)2016–17: #236 of 351 (14-18)2017–18: #295 of 351 (10-20)2018–19: #344 of 353 (4-26)2019–20: #351 of 353 (1-28)2020–21: #333 of 347 (5-19)2021–22: #240 of 358 (13-18)2022–23: #134 of 363 (26-9)2023–24: #214 of 362 (15-16)2024–25: #156 of 364 (19-14)2025–26: #136 of 365 (21-14) 2009–10 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 136 of 365 21–14 2.47 Power
2024–25 156 of 364 19–14 0.54 Power
2023–24 214 of 362 15–16 -3.43 Power
2022–23 134 of 363 26–9 2.67 Power
2021–22 240 of 358 13–18 -4.73 Power
2020–21 333 of 347 5–19 -14.74 Power
2019–20 351 of 353 1–28 -128.94 MRI
2018–19 344 of 353 4–26 -87.67 MRI
2017–18 295 of 351 10–20 -21.24 MRI
2016–17 236 of 351 14–18 10.14 MRI
2015–16 277 of 351 11–20 -15.82 MRI
2014–15 339 of 351 10–22 -64.94 MRI
2013–14 342 of 351 6–25 -73.08 MRI
2012–13 334 of 347 3–27 -73.00 MRI
2011–12 335 of 345 3–28 -76.67 MRI
2010–11 321 of 346 8–23 -53.89 MRI
2009–10 278 of 335 13–20 -17.68 MRI