Clemson
ACC · 24–11
Power+15.9#34 of 365
Résumé+12.88#33 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLouisville (80–75)
Worst lossGeorgetown (74–79)
Schedule faced+7.9 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs | New Hampshire | W 88–38 | +33.2 | +16.8 |
| 1 | vs | Gardner-Webb | W 97–59 | +39.7 | -1.7 |
| 2 | vs | Morehead State | W 83–56 | +27.1 | -0.1 |
| 2 | at | Georgetown | L 74–79 | +6.2 | -11.2 |
| 3 | vs | North Alabama | W 81–61 | +31.4 | -11.4 |
| 3 | N | West Virginia | W 70–67 | +4.1 | -1.1 |
| 3 | N | Georgia | W 97–94 | -0.6 | +3.6 |
| 4 | vs | Alabama A&M | W 92–56 | +31.3 | +4.7 |
| 5 | at | Alabama | L 84–90 | -11.3 | +5.3 |
| 6 | at | BYU | L 64–67 | -6.1 | +3.1 |
| 6 | vs | Mercer | W 70–63 | +17.9 | -10.9 |
| 7 | vs | South Carolina | W 68–61 | +13.2 | -6.2 |
| 7 | vs | Cincinnati | W 68–65 | +4.2 | -1.2 |
| 9 | at | Syracuse | W 64–61 | +7.1 | -4.1 |
| 9 | at | Pittsburgh | W 73–68 | +7.6 | -2.6 |
| 10 | vs | SMU | W 74–70 | +4.7 | -0.7 |
| 10 | at | Notre Dame | W 76–61 | +8.1 | +6.9 |
| 11 | vs | Boston College | W 74–50 | +20.2 | +3.8 |
| 11 | vs | Miami | W 69–59 | +5.1 | +4.9 |
| 12 | vs | NC State | L 76–80 | +4.8 | -8.8 |
| 12 | at | Georgia Tech | W 77–63 | +14.4 | -0.4 |
| 13 | vs | Pittsburgh | W 63–52 | +13.0 | -2.0 |
| 14 | at | Stanford | W 66–64 | +4.1 | -2.1 |
| 14 | at | California | W 77–55 | +6.1 | +15.9 |
| 15 | vs | Virginia Tech | L 66–76 | +9.7 | -19.6 |
| 15 | at | Duke | L 54–67 | -18.6 | +5.6 |
| 16 | at | Wake Forest | L 77–85 | +4.3 | -12.3 |
| 16 | vs | Florida State | L 65–70 | +9.9 | -14.9 |
| 17 | vs | Louisville | W 80–75 | -1.3 | +6.3 |
| 18 | at | North Carolina | L 63–67 | -4.5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | vs | Georgia Tech | W 79–76 | +19.8 | -16.8 |
| 19 | N | Wake Forest | W 71–62 | +7.0 | +2.0 |
| 19 | N | North Carolina | W 80–79 | -1.8 | +2.8 |
| 19 | N | Duke | L 61–73 | -15.9 | +3.9 |
| 20 | N | Iowa | L 61–67 | -1.9 | -4.1 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #17 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 34 of 365 | 24–11 | 15.89 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 21 of 364 | 27–7 | 18.12 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 26 of 362 | 24–12 | 14.58 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 64 of 363 | 23–11 | 9.93 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 77 of 358 | 17–16 | 8.17 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 79 of 347 | 16–8 | 7.46 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 119 of 353 | 16–15 | 54.52 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 46 of 353 | 20–14 | 100.64 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 20 of 351 | 24–9 | 145.47 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 78 of 351 | 17–15 | 82.36 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 98 of 351 | 17–14 | 73.85 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 135 of 351 | 16–15 | 51.49 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 56 of 351 | 23–13 | 98.07 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 151 of 347 | 13–18 | 37.52 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 90 of 345 | 16–15 | 75.61 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 36 of 346 | 22–12 | 116.95 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 35 of 335 | 21–11 | 127.30 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 17 of 330 | 23–9 | 147.20 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 29 of 328 | 24–10 | 131.36 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 25 of 326 | 25–11 | 129.53 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 50 of 326 | 19–13 | 98.12 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 74 of 326 | 16–16 | 76.27 | MRI |