The MRI
2025–26 · Final

The Citadel

SoCon · 11–22

Power-15.8#347 of 365
Résumé-9.55#689 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winFurman (77–75)
Worst lossHouston Christian (65–72)
Schedule faced-6.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Erskine non-D1 W 105–61 +24.8 +19.2
1 at Boston College L 47–76 -16.9 -12.1
2 vs Charleston Southern L 86–96 -7.2 -2.8
2 at West Georgia L 92–100 -6.7 -1.3
3 vs North Greenville non-D1 W 70–57 +24.8 -11.8
4 vs Bellarmine L 58–70 -3.6 -8.4
4 vs Houston Christian L 65–72 -0.8 -6.2
4 N Presbyterian L 41–69 -9.5 -18.5
5 at Davidson L 63–79 -21.6 +5.6
6 vs Southern Wesleyan non-D1 W 98–73 +24.8 +0.2
6 at South Carolina L 55–71 -23.9 +7.9
7 at Charleston L 78–82 -18.9 +14.9
7 at Richmond L 56–80 -18.6 -5.4
9 vs East Tennessee State L 49–74 -16.4 -8.6
9 vs Wofford L 86–95 -10.4 +1.4
10 at Mercer L 63–101 -19.2 -18.8
10 vs Western Carolina W 79–77 -8.1 +10.1
11 at UNC Greensboro L 66–69 -11.0 +8.0
11 at VMI W 82–68 -0.5 +14.5
12 vs Furman W 77–75 -14.6 +16.6
12 at East Tennessee State L 55–84 -21.9 -7.1
13 vs VMI W 80–56 +4.9 +19.1
13 vs UNC Greensboro W 71–66 -5.5 +10.5
14 at Samford L 64–78 -19.3 +5.3
14 at Chattanooga W 78–71 -13.7 +20.7
15 at Western Carolina L 49–87 -13.5 -24.5
15 vs Mercer L 54–70 -13.8 -2.2
16 vs Samford L 75–78 -13.8 +10.8
16 vs Chattanooga L 72–93 -8.3 -12.7
17 at Furman L 51–72 -20.1 -0.9
17 at Wofford W 93–90 -15.9 +18.9
18 N Chattanooga W 88–85 -11.0 +14.0
18 N East Tennessee State L 76–83 -19.1 +12.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #141 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #275 of 326 (12-16)2005–06: #312 of 326 (10-21)2006–07: #315 of 326 (7-23)2007–08: #322 of 328 (6-24)2008–09: #141 of 330 (20-13)2009–10: #179 of 335 (16-16)2010–11: #268 of 346 (10-22)2011–12: #320 of 345 (6-23)2012–13: #339 of 347 (6-22)2013–14: #346 of 351 (7-26)2014–15: #319 of 351 (11-19)2015–16: #327 of 351 (10-22)2016–17: #297 of 351 (12-21)2017–18: #318 of 351 (11-21)2018–19: #298 of 353 (9-18)2019–20: #342 of 353 (3-24)2020–21: #213 of 347 (13-12)2021–22: #228 of 358 (13-18)2022–23: #304 of 363 (10-22)2023–24: #273 of 362 (11-21)2024–25: #352 of 364 (5-25)2025–26: #347 of 365 (11-22) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 347 of 365 11–22 -15.76 Power
2024–25 352 of 364 5–25 -15.77 Power
2023–24 273 of 362 11–21 -6.52 Power
2022–23 304 of 363 10–22 -9.14 Power
2021–22 228 of 358 13–18 -3.68 Power
2020–21 213 of 347 13–12 -2.71 Power
2019–20 342 of 353 3–24 -78.01 MRI
2018–19 298 of 353 9–18 -30.02 MRI
2017–18 318 of 351 11–21 -38.76 MRI
2016–17 297 of 351 12–21 -25.09 MRI
2015–16 327 of 351 10–22 -47.91 MRI
2014–15 319 of 351 11–19 -37.06 MRI
2013–14 346 of 351 7–26 -76.40 MRI
2012–13 339 of 347 6–22 -84.06 MRI
2011–12 320 of 345 6–23 -55.05 MRI
2010–11 268 of 346 10–22 -11.34 MRI
2009–10 179 of 335 16–16 31.93 MRI
2008–09 141 of 330 20–13 44.84 MRI
2007–08 322 of 328 6–24 -78.69 MRI
2006–07 315 of 326 7–23 -53.83 MRI
2005–06 312 of 326 10–21 -61.33 MRI
2004–05 275 of 326 12–16 -16.41 MRI