The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Portland

WCC · 15–19

Power-6.2#249 of 365
Résumé-1.49#520 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winGonzaga (87–80)
Worst lossPepperdine (63–67)
Schedule faced+0.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Willamette non-D1 W 120–83 +34.4 +2.6
1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 83–74 +11.6 -2.6
1 vs UC Davis W 67–63 -1.9 +5.9
2 at Wyoming L 56–93 -13.4 -23.6
3 N Cal State Fullerton W 103–85 -1.7 +19.7
3 vs Northern Colorado L 80–86 -5.4 -0.6
3 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota L 66–76 -9.3 -0.7
4 vs Long Beach State W 93–73 +4.9 +15.1
5 at Stanford L 72–94 -18.0 -4.0
5 vs Lewis & Clark non-D1 W 104–87 +34.4 -17.4
6 vs Kent State W 88–78 -5.6 +15.6
7 at Oregon L 69–94 -16.1 -8.9
8 at UC Santa Barbara L 61–79 -9.6 -8.4
8 vs Washington State L 62–67 -4.7 -0.3
9 vs Santa Clara L 85–92 -18.7 +11.7
9 at Saint Mary's L 57–78 -27.8 +6.8
10 at San Francisco L 68–73 -13.0 +8.0
10 vs Pacific W 90–89 -3.8 +4.8
10 vs Oregon State W 82–76 -3.0 +9.0
11 at Pepperdine L 63–67 +1.0 -5.0
11 at Loyola Marymount W 71–58 -8.2 +21.2
12 vs Saint Mary's L 69–75 -22.3 +16.3
13 at Pacific L 51–74 -9.2 -13.8
13 at Washington State L 74–104 -10.1 -19.9
14 vs Gonzaga W 87–80 -28.2 +35.2
14 vs Seattle U W 54–53 -7.6 +8.6
15 at San Diego L 58–71 -0.7 -12.3
16 vs Pepperdine L 87–95 +6.4 -14.4
16 at Seattle U L 59–71 -13.0 +1.0
17 at Gonzaga L 48–89 -33.7 -7.3
17 vs San Diego W 87–74 +4.8 +8.2
18 N Pepperdine W 77–68 +3.7 +5.3
18 N Washington State W 74–68 -7.4 +13.4
18 N San Francisco L 65–82 -10.3 -6.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #73 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #178 of 326 (14-15)2005–06: #280 of 326 (11-18)2006–07: #281 of 326 (9-23)2007–08: #256 of 328 (9-22)2008–09: #113 of 330 (19-13)2009–10: #73 of 335 (21-11)2010–11: #97 of 346 (20-12)2011–12: #303 of 345 (7-24)2012–13: #268 of 347 (9-21)2013–14: #119 of 351 (15-16)2014–15: #128 of 351 (17-16)2015–16: #220 of 351 (12-20)2016–17: #291 of 351 (11-22)2017–18: #311 of 351 (10-22)2018–19: #338 of 353 (5-25)2019–20: #313 of 353 (7-22)2020–21: #336 of 347 (6-15)2021–22: #212 of 358 (19-15)2022–23: #189 of 363 (14-19)2023–24: #298 of 362 (12-21)2024–25: #303 of 364 (12-20)2025–26: #249 of 365 (15-19) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 249 of 365 15–19 -6.21 Power
2024–25 303 of 364 12–20 -9.70 Power
2023–24 298 of 362 12–21 -8.23 Power
2022–23 189 of 363 14–19 -0.90 Power
2021–22 212 of 358 19–15 -2.80 Power
2020–21 336 of 347 6–15 -15.00 Power
2019–20 313 of 353 7–22 -40.38 MRI
2018–19 338 of 353 5–25 -74.47 MRI
2017–18 311 of 351 10–22 -32.95 MRI
2016–17 291 of 351 11–22 -20.89 MRI
2015–16 220 of 351 12–20 11.67 MRI
2014–15 128 of 351 17–16 54.14 MRI
2013–14 119 of 351 15–16 60.04 MRI
2012–13 268 of 347 9–21 -20.01 MRI
2011–12 303 of 345 7–24 -34.47 MRI
2010–11 97 of 346 20–12 70.09 MRI
2009–10 73 of 335 21–11 86.11 MRI
2008–09 113 of 330 19–13 60.70 MRI
2007–08 256 of 328 9–22 -11.08 MRI
2006–07 281 of 326 9–23 -25.54 MRI
2005–06 280 of 326 11–18 -16.82 MRI
2004–05 178 of 326 14–15 26.34 MRI