Charleston Southern
Big South · 1–2
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -3.4 avg | × 27% | -0.9 |
| Opponents faced | -3.3 avg | × 27% | -0.9 |
| Preseason prior | -9.8 | × 73% | -7.2 |
| Power | -9.0 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | South Florida | L 71–98 | -25.8 | -1.2 | -1.2 |
| 2 | vs | Columbia International non-D1 | W 86–49 | +27.2 | +9.8 | +0.1 |
| 3 | at | Wake Forest | L 64–82 | -21.2 | +3.2 | -0.7 |
| Preseason prior (73% of the rating) | -7.2 | |||||
| Power | -9.0 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | vs | West Georgia | +8.5 | 78% |
| 4 | vs | Wofford | -1.3 | 45% |
| 4 | at | Mercer | -10.5 | 17% |
| 5 | at | James Madison | -10.7 | 17% |
| 5 | at | East Tennessee State | -15.0 | 9% |
| 5 | N | Morehead State | +3.5 | 63% |
| 6 | vs | The Citadel | +9.8 | 81% |
| 6 | at | South Carolina State | -0.1 | 50% |
Season by season
Best finish: #118 in 2011–12. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 15–17 | #250 of 365 · -6.23 | – |
| 2024–25 | 10–22 | #311 of 364 · -10.89 | – |
| 2023–24 | 10–20 | #317 of 362 · -10.97 | – |
| 2022–23 | 10–21 | #303 of 363 · -9.03 | – |
| 2021–22 | 6–25 | #344 of 358 · -15.54 | – |
| 2020–21 | 3–18 | #325 of 347 · -13.55 | – |
| 2019–20 | 12–18 | – | #304 of 353 · -33.00 |
| 2018–19 | 14–16 | – | #180 of 353 · 26.26 |
| 2017–18 | 15–16 | – | #203 of 351 · 24.98 |
| 2016–17 | 12–19 | – | #257 of 351 · -2.82 |
| 2015–16 | 9–21 | – | #287 of 351 · -20.01 |
| 2014–15 | 19–12 | – | #130 of 351 · 53.17 |
| 2013–14 | 13–18 | – | #173 of 351 · 36.08 |
| 2012–13 | 16–12 | – | #135 of 347 · 44.77 |
| 2011–12 | 19–12 | – | #118 of 345 · 61.45 |
| 2010–11 | 16–16 | – | #171 of 346 · 34.29 |
| 2009–10 | 13–17 | – | #228 of 335 · 8.06 |
| 2008–09 | 9–20 | – | #273 of 330 · -15.29 |
| 2007–08 | 10–20 | – | #303 of 328 · -39.14 |
| 2006–07 | 8–22 | – | #310 of 326 · -48.67 |
| 2005–06 | 13–16 | – | #226 of 326 · 7.50 |
| 2004–05 | 13–17 | – | #281 of 326 · -20.68 |