The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Charleston Southern

Big South · 15–17

Power-5.8#247 of 365
Résumé-5.79#625 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWinthrop (86–84)
Worst lossAlabama A&M (64–68)
Schedule faced-8.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Virginia Tech L 67–98 -17.6 -13.4
1 vs Toccoa Falls non-D1 W 106–71 +34.8 +0.2
2 at The Citadel W 96–86 +7.2 +2.8
2 at Alabama A&M L 64–68 +4.1 -8.1
2 N Lindenwood L 77–83 +0.4 -6.4
3 vs IU Indianapolis W 103–91 +9.5 +2.5
3 at East Carolina W 77–65 -1.2 +13.2
4 vs Piedmont non-D1 W 93–81 +34.8 -22.8
4 at South Carolina L 62–74 -14.0 +2.0
5 at UT Martin L 56–73 -5.0 -12.0
5 vs Warren Wilson non-D1 W 124–63 +34.8 +26.2
6 vs South Carolina State W 84–44 +13.9 +26.1
7 vs North Florida W 113–90 +10.2 +12.8
7 at Furman L 76–84 -10.2 +2.2
8 at Richmond W 77–72 -8.7 +13.7
9 at Gardner-Webb W 89–79 +12.5 -2.5
9 vs UNC Asheville W 86–83 +0.9 +2.1
10 at Winthrop L 77–81 -11.5 +7.5
10 vs High Point L 82–84 -14.0 +12.0
11 vs South Carolina Upstate L 81–86 +6.4 -11.4
12 at Presbyterian L 83–87 -2.3 -1.7
12 at Longwood L 79–81 -4.0 +2.0
13 vs Radford L 75–84 +1.1 -10.1
14 at High Point L 55–80 -19.4 -5.6
14 at South Carolina Upstate L 94–100 +0.9 -6.9
15 vs Presbyterian W 84–67 +3.1 +13.9
15 at Radford L 80–90 -4.3 -5.7
16 vs Gardner-Webb W 75–66 +17.9 -8.9
16 vs Longwood L 96–107 +1.5 -12.5
17 vs Winthrop W 86–84 -6.1 +8.1
17 at UNC Asheville W 92–75 -4.5 +21.5
18 N Winthrop L 81–86 -8.8 +3.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #118 in 2011–12. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #281 of 326 (13-17)2005–06: #226 of 326 (13-16)2006–07: #310 of 326 (8-22)2007–08: #303 of 328 (10-20)2008–09: #273 of 330 (9-20)2009–10: #228 of 335 (13-17)2010–11: #171 of 346 (16-16)2011–12: #118 of 345 (19-12)2012–13: #135 of 347 (16-12)2013–14: #173 of 351 (13-18)2014–15: #130 of 351 (19-12)2015–16: #287 of 351 (9-21)2016–17: #257 of 351 (12-19)2017–18: #203 of 351 (15-16)2018–19: #180 of 353 (14-16)2019–20: #304 of 353 (12-18)2020–21: #328 of 347 (3-18)2021–22: #346 of 358 (6-25)2022–23: #311 of 363 (10-21)2023–24: #320 of 362 (10-20)2024–25: #319 of 364 (10-22)2025–26: #247 of 365 (15-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 247 of 365 15–17 -5.85 Power
2024–25 319 of 364 10–22 -11.24 Power
2023–24 320 of 362 10–20 -11.16 Power
2022–23 311 of 363 10–21 -9.70 Power
2021–22 346 of 358 6–25 -15.72 Power
2020–21 328 of 347 3–18 -13.53 Power
2019–20 304 of 353 12–18 -33.00 MRI
2018–19 180 of 353 14–16 26.26 MRI
2017–18 203 of 351 15–16 24.98 MRI
2016–17 257 of 351 12–19 -2.82 MRI
2015–16 287 of 351 9–21 -20.01 MRI
2014–15 130 of 351 19–12 53.17 MRI
2013–14 173 of 351 13–18 36.08 MRI
2012–13 135 of 347 16–12 44.77 MRI
2011–12 118 of 345 19–12 61.45 MRI
2010–11 171 of 346 16–16 34.29 MRI
2009–10 228 of 335 13–17 8.06 MRI
2008–09 273 of 330 9–20 -15.29 MRI
2007–08 303 of 328 10–20 -39.14 MRI
2006–07 310 of 326 8–22 -48.67 MRI
2005–06 226 of 326 13–16 7.50 MRI
2004–05 281 of 326 13–17 -20.68 MRI