The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Grambling

SWAC · 1–1

Power-11.7#313 of 365
Résumé+0.20#146 · wins above average
Movement-3down from #310 last week
Best winNorthern Illinois (89–87)
Worst lossTexas (62–93)
Schedule faced+5.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-1.3 avg opponent
Returning production3% of last season's win shares · #315 of 364 · counted against its preseason rating
Incoming production2.9 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 2 games, w is 20%, so the preseason prior is 80% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-13.3 avg× 20%-2.7
Opponents faced+5.8 avg× 20%+1.2
Preseason prior-12.7× 80%-10.2
Power-11.7

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 N Northern Illinois W 89–87 -2.1 +4.1 -0.6
3 at Texas L 62–93 -35.9 +4.9 -0.9
Preseason prior (80% of the rating)-10.2
Power-11.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
4 at Kentucky -32.3 0%
4 vs Southern Miss -3.4 38%
5 vs Ecclesia non-D1 +24.5 99%
5 at New Orleans -6.3 28%
5 at Southern Miss -9.3 20%
6 N Tennessee State -5.2 32%
8 at Duke -46.3 0%

Season by season

Best finish: #187 in 2022–23. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #230 of 326 (14-12)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #235 of 326 (14-13)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #261 of 326 (12-14)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #316 of 328 (7-19)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #327 of 330 (6-23)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #321 of 335 (7-21)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #319 of 346 (12-21)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #345 of 345 (4-24)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #347 of 347 (0-28)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #349 of 351 (5-24)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #351 of 351 (2-27)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #335 of 351 (7-24)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #277 of 351 (16-17)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #253 of 351 (17-14)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #266 of 353 (13-17)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #267 of 353 (13-15)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #271 of 347 (12-12)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #306 of 358 (12-20)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #187 of 363 (24-9)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #268 of 362 (21-15)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #302 of 364 (12-22)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #297 of 365 (14-19) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 14–19 #297 of 365 · -9.80 –
2024–25 12–22 #302 of 364 · -9.65 –
2023–24 21–15 #268 of 362 · -6.29 –
2022–23 24–9 #187 of 363 · -1.08 –
2021–22 12–20 #306 of 358 · -10.30 –
2020–21 12–12 #271 of 347 · -7.77 –
2019–20 13–15 – #267 of 353 · -8.87
2018–19 13–17 – #266 of 353 · -10.51
2017–18 17–14 – #253 of 351 · 1.58
2016–17 16–17 – #277 of 351 · -10.93
2015–16 7–24 – #335 of 351 · -58.57
2014–15 2–27 – #351 of 351 · -141.16
2013–14 5–24 – #349 of 351 · -91.96
2012–13 0–28 – #347 of 347 · -220.40
2011–12 4–24 – #345 of 345 · -123.61
2010–11 12–21 – #319 of 346 · -53.19
2009–10 7–21 – #321 of 335 · -64.50
2008–09 6–23 – #327 of 330 · -88.08
2007–08 7–19 – #316 of 328 · -58.62
2006–07 12–14 – #261 of 326 · -12.57
2005–06 14–13 – #235 of 326 · 1.09
2004–05 14–12 – #230 of 326 · 6.33