The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Tennessee State

OVC · 23–10

Power-1.0#182 of 365
Résumé+0.69#150 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUNLV (63–60)
Worst lossAlabama A&M (53–80)
Schedule faced-8.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Fisk non-D1 W 101–50 +39.6 +11.4
1 at Belmont L 79–87 -14.1 +6.1
2 vs Oakwood non-D1 W 114–76 +39.6 -1.6
2 at Western Kentucky L 82–95 -4.8 -8.2
3 at Tennessee L 60–89 -26.9 -2.1
4 at UNC Asheville W 75–73 +0.3 +1.7
4 N Tennessee Wesleyan non-D1 W 98–77 +36.8 -15.8
4 at Chattanooga W 70–64 +1.0 +5.0
5 at Alabama A&M L 53–80 +8.9 -35.9
6 at UNLV W 63–60 -8.3 +11.3
7 vs UT Martin W 78–71 +5.3 +1.7
7 vs Southeast Missouri State L 82–91 +4.8 -13.8
9 at Tennessee Tech W 88–76 +6.9 +5.1
9 at Little Rock W 84–79 +5.7 -0.7
10 at Western Illinois W 90–68 +17.8 +4.2
10 at Eastern Illinois L 70–74 +7.8 -11.8
11 vs Morehead State W 105–100 +10.1 -5.1
11 vs Southern Indiana W 73–67 +16.9 -10.9
12 at SIU Edwardsville L 66–74 +0.5 -8.5
12 at Lindenwood W 96–86 +2.5 +7.5
13 vs Little Rock W 70–63 +11.1 -4.1
14 vs Tennessee Tech L 85–90 +12.4 -17.4
14 vs Eastern Illinois W 77–68 +13.2 -4.2
14 vs Western Illinois W 83–56 +23.2 +3.8
15 at Southern Indiana W 73–71 +11.4 -9.4
15 at Morehead State L 86–94 +4.7 -12.7
16 vs Lindenwood W 89–80 +7.9 +1.1
16 vs SIU Edwardsville W 80–53 +5.9 +21.1
17 at Southeast Missouri State W 79–71 -0.6 +8.6
17 at UT Martin W 67–42 -0.2 +25.2
18 N UT Martin W 68–55 +2.5 +10.4
18 N Morehead State W 93–67 +7.4 +18.6
20 N Iowa State L 74–108 -27.7 -6.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #115 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #214 of 326 (13-17)2005–06: #196 of 326 (13-15)2006–07: #248 of 326 (12-20)2007–08: #191 of 328 (15-17)2008–09: #282 of 330 (12-18)2009–10: #290 of 335 (9-23)2010–11: #231 of 346 (14-16)2011–12: #127 of 345 (19-11)2012–13: #147 of 347 (16-14)2013–14: #303 of 351 (5-25)2014–15: #342 of 351 (5-26)2015–16: #115 of 351 (20-11)2016–17: #126 of 351 (17-13)2017–18: #180 of 351 (15-15)2018–19: #302 of 353 (7-21)2019–20: #228 of 353 (16-15)2020–21: #305 of 347 (4-19)2021–22: #274 of 358 (14-18)2022–23: #285 of 363 (18-14)2023–24: #281 of 362 (18-15)2024–25: #241 of 364 (17-16)2025–26: #182 of 365 (23-10) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 182 of 365 23–10 -1.04 Power
2024–25 241 of 364 17–16 -5.05 Power
2023–24 281 of 362 18–15 -7.21 Power
2022–23 285 of 363 18–14 -7.78 Power
2021–22 274 of 358 14–18 -7.36 Power
2020–21 305 of 347 4–19 -10.03 Power
2019–20 228 of 353 16–15 5.78 MRI
2018–19 302 of 353 7–21 -31.47 MRI
2017–18 180 of 351 15–15 33.74 MRI
2016–17 126 of 351 17–13 56.30 MRI
2015–16 115 of 351 20–11 63.94 MRI
2014–15 342 of 351 5–26 -70.11 MRI
2013–14 303 of 351 5–25 -28.08 MRI
2012–13 147 of 347 16–14 38.70 MRI
2011–12 127 of 345 19–11 54.62 MRI
2010–11 231 of 346 14–16 8.05 MRI
2009–10 290 of 335 9–23 -24.29 MRI
2008–09 282 of 330 12–18 -18.32 MRI
2007–08 191 of 328 15–17 20.78 MRI
2006–07 248 of 326 12–20 -7.19 MRI
2005–06 196 of 326 13–15 22.46 MRI
2004–05 214 of 326 13–17 14.17 MRI