Kansas City
Summit · 2–3
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 5 games, w is 38%, so the preseason prior is 62% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -2.1 avg | × 38% | -0.8 |
| Opponents faced | -1.1 avg | × 38% | -0.4 |
| Preseason prior | -19.4 | × 62% | -12.0 |
| Power | -13.2 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at | Creighton | L 61–76 | -29.0 | +14.0 | +0.0 |
| 2 | vs | Southern Illinois | W 100–93 | -10.2 | +17.2 | +0.2 |
| 3 | at | Jacksonville | L 61–79 | -9.8 | -8.2 | -1.8 |
| 3 | N | Florida A&M | W 87–65 | +7.5 | +14.5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | N | George Mason | L 68–76 | -21.8 | +13.8 | -0.3 |
| Preseason prior (62% of the rating) | -12.0 | |||||
| Power | -13.2 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | vs | Newman University non-D1 | +22.9 | 98% |
| 4 | at | Iona | -11.1 | 16% |
| 5 | vs | Green Bay | -9.1 | 20% |
| 5 | vs | Southeast Missouri State | -5.8 | 30% |
| 6 | vs | Peru State non-D1 | +22.9 | 98% |
| 11 | vs | South Dakota State | -9.9 | 18% |
| 11 | vs | South Dakota | +2.2 | 58% |
| 12 | at | North Dakota State | -12.9 | 12% |
Season by season
Best finish: #161 in 2004–05. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 4–27 | #360 of 365 · -19.69 | – |
| 2024–25 | 13–20 | #221 of 364 · -3.71 | – |
| 2023–24 | 16–16 | #212 of 362 · -3.66 | – |
| 2022–23 | 11–21 | #306 of 363 · -9.23 | – |
| 2021–22 | 19–12 | #184 of 358 · -0.59 | – |
| 2020–21 | 11–13 | #181 of 347 · -1.02 | – |
| 2019–20 | 13–14 | – | #250 of 353 · -1.18 |
| 2018–19 | 10–21 | – | #278 of 353 · -18.45 |
| 2017–18 | 10–22 | – | #302 of 351 · -27.09 |
| 2016–17 | 18–17 | – | #216 of 351 · 17.62 |
| 2015–16 | 12–19 | – | #248 of 351 · -2.36 |
| 2014–15 | 14–19 | – | #260 of 351 · -1.08 |
| 2013–14 | 10–20 | – | #290 of 351 · -17.08 |
| 2012–13 | 7–24 | – | #313 of 347 · -46.29 |
| 2011–12 | 10–21 | – | #293 of 345 · -25.37 |
| 2010–11 | 16–14 | – | #250 of 346 · -2.34 |
| 2009–10 | 12–18 | – | #264 of 335 · -8.05 |
| 2008–09 | 7–24 | – | #301 of 330 · -38.45 |
| 2007–08 | 11–21 | – | #279 of 328 · -20.73 |
| 2006–07 | 12–20 | – | #246 of 326 · -6.48 |
| 2005–06 | 14–14 | – | #268 of 326 · -13.16 |
| 2004–05 | 16–12 | – | #161 of 326 · 32.14 |