The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Kansas City

Summit · 4–27

Power-18.9#360 of 365
Résumé-14.08#720 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winOmaha (73–66)
Worst lossOral Roberts (60–69)
Schedule faced-5.0 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-0.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Evangel non-D1 W 80–74 +21.7 -15.7
1 at Southern Illinois L 78–101 -24.9 +1.9
2 vs Iona L 91–105 -11.4 -2.6
2 at Texas L 55–71 -37.3 +21.3
3 at TCU L 45–81 -34.6 -1.4
4 at Lindenwood L 67–80 -15.4 +2.4
4 at Weber State L 61–82 -18.4 -2.6
5 vs Idaho State L 59–68 -9.8 +0.8
5 at Eastern Washington L 66–90 -18.2 -5.8
6 vs Weber State L 60–64 -13.0 +9.0
6 vs Spurgeon College non-D1 W 102–75 +21.7 +5.3
7 at Oklahoma L 67–89 -35.5 +13.5
7 at Oklahoma State L 79–91 -29.4 +17.4
8 vs McPherson non-D1 W 91–78 +21.7 -8.7
9 at Denver L 74–87 -16.1 +3.1
9 at Omaha W 73–66 -16.1 +23.1
10 vs North Dakota State L 73–97 -21.4 -2.6
10 vs North Dakota L 79–81 -9.0 +7.0
11 at South Dakota L 83–99 -13.4 -2.6
11 at South Dakota State L 62–90 -20.5 -7.5
12 vs Omaha L 60–77 -10.7 -6.3
13 vs Denver L 61–69 -10.7 +2.7
13 at St. Thomas-Minnesota L 64–99 -27.4 -7.6
14 vs South Dakota L 75–82 -7.9 +0.9
15 at Oral Roberts L 60–69 -10.4 +1.4
15 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota L 64–104 -22.0 -18.0
16 at North Dakota L 70–85 -14.4 -0.6
16 at North Dakota State L 59–95 -26.8 -9.2
17 vs South Dakota State L 59–73 -15.0 +1.0
17 vs Oral Roberts L 70–94 -4.9 -19.1
18 N Oral Roberts L 62–84 -7.6 -14.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
7 vs Austin Peay -15.8 8%

Season by season

Best finish: #161 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #161 of 326 (16-12)2005–06: #268 of 326 (14-14)2006–07: #246 of 326 (12-20)2007–08: #279 of 328 (11-21)2008–09: #301 of 330 (7-24)2009–10: #264 of 335 (12-18)2010–11: #250 of 346 (16-14)2011–12: #293 of 345 (10-21)2012–13: #313 of 347 (7-24)2013–14: #290 of 351 (10-20)2014–15: #260 of 351 (14-19)2015–16: #248 of 351 (12-19)2016–17: #216 of 351 (18-17)2017–18: #302 of 351 (10-22)2018–19: #278 of 353 (10-21)2019–20: #250 of 353 (13-14)2020–21: #167 of 347 (11-13)2021–22: #171 of 358 (19-12)2022–23: #296 of 363 (11-21)2023–24: #209 of 362 (16-16)2024–25: #221 of 364 (13-20)2025–26: #360 of 365 (4-27) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 360 of 365 4–27 -18.89 Power
2024–25 221 of 364 13–20 -3.62 Power
2023–24 209 of 362 16–16 -3.24 Power
2022–23 296 of 363 11–21 -8.18 Power
2021–22 171 of 358 19–12 0.24 Power
2020–21 167 of 347 11–13 -0.04 Power
2019–20 250 of 353 13–14 -1.18 MRI
2018–19 278 of 353 10–21 -18.45 MRI
2017–18 302 of 351 10–22 -27.09 MRI
2016–17 216 of 351 18–17 17.62 MRI
2015–16 248 of 351 12–19 -2.36 MRI
2014–15 260 of 351 14–19 -1.08 MRI
2013–14 290 of 351 10–20 -17.08 MRI
2012–13 313 of 347 7–24 -46.29 MRI
2011–12 293 of 345 10–21 -25.37 MRI
2010–11 250 of 346 16–14 -2.34 MRI
2009–10 264 of 335 12–18 -8.05 MRI
2008–09 301 of 330 7–24 -38.45 MRI
2007–08 279 of 328 11–21 -20.73 MRI
2006–07 246 of 326 12–20 -6.48 MRI
2005–06 268 of 326 14–14 -13.16 MRI
2004–05 161 of 326 16–12 32.14 MRI