The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Iona

Metro · 18–14

Power-4.8#232 of 365
Résumé-3.52#590 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winHofstra (81–73)
Worst lossRider (68–72)
Schedule faced-5.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Hofstra W 81–73 -8.5 +16.5
2 at Kansas City W 105–91 +11.4 +2.6
2 vs Fordham W 76–71 -0.5 +5.5
3 vs Princeton W 89–69 +2.6 +17.4
3 N Akron L 75–96 -16.6 -4.4
3 N Oregon State W 91–84 -4.3 +11.3
4 N Green Bay L 75–80 +0.4 -5.4
5 at Delaware W 89–66 +1.6 +21.4
5 vs Quinnipiac L 68–89 -0.5 -20.5
5 at Sacred Heart W 81–69 +0.7 +11.3
6 vs Bryant W 69–63 +10.3 -4.3
6 at St. John's L 64–91 -31.0 +4.0
7 at Vermont W 83–78 -5.1 +10.1
9 at Mount St. Mary's L 59–66 -0.1 -6.9
9 vs Siena W 75–72 -1.2 +4.2
9 at Marist L 38–83 -6.1 -38.9
10 vs Niagara W 71–53 +12.4 +5.6
10 vs Canisius W 74–48 +14.4 +11.6
11 at Rider L 68–72 +10.4 -14.4
12 at Saint Peter's L 63–77 -2.5 -11.5
12 vs Merrimack W 61–60 -1.7 +2.7
12 vs Manhattan W 66–57 +10.8 -1.8
13 vs Fairfield L 70–71 +4.4 -5.4
14 at Siena L 72–79 -6.7 -0.3
14 vs Mount St. Mary's L 76–83 +5.3 -12.3
15 at Canisius W 69–63 +8.9 -2.9
15 at Niagara L 68–70 +6.9 -8.9
16 vs Saint Peter's W 72–64 +3.0 +5.0
16 at Merrimack L 86–88 -7.2 +5.2
17 vs Rider W 80–58 +15.9 +6.1
17 at Manhattan W 69–65 +5.4 -1.4
18 N Sacred Heart L 80–91 +3.4 -14.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #34 in 2010–11. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #172 of 326 (15-15)2005–06: #49 of 326 (23-8)2006–07: #323 of 326 (2-28)2007–08: #217 of 328 (12-20)2008–09: #205 of 330 (12-19)2009–10: #98 of 335 (21-10)2010–11: #34 of 346 (25-12)2011–12: #35 of 345 (25-8)2012–13: #73 of 347 (20-13)2013–14: #93 of 351 (22-11)2014–15: #96 of 351 (26-9)2015–16: #96 of 351 (22-11)2016–17: #117 of 351 (22-13)2017–18: #139 of 351 (20-14)2018–19: #177 of 353 (17-16)2019–20: #230 of 353 (12-17)2020–21: #163 of 347 (12-6)2021–22: #96 of 358 (25-8)2022–23: #59 of 363 (27-8)2023–24: #182 of 362 (16-17)2024–25: #245 of 364 (17-17)2025–26: #232 of 365 (18-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 232 of 365 18–14 -4.81 Power
2024–25 245 of 364 17–17 -5.43 Power
2023–24 182 of 362 16–17 -1.28 Power
2022–23 59 of 363 27–8 10.05 Power
2021–22 96 of 358 25–8 5.95 Power
2020–21 163 of 347 12–6 0.26 Power
2019–20 230 of 353 12–17 4.97 MRI
2018–19 177 of 353 17–16 27.71 MRI
2017–18 139 of 351 20–14 51.75 MRI
2016–17 117 of 351 22–13 60.21 MRI
2015–16 96 of 351 22–11 75.43 MRI
2014–15 96 of 351 26–9 71.77 MRI
2013–14 93 of 351 22–11 72.83 MRI
2012–13 73 of 347 20–13 77.43 MRI
2011–12 35 of 345 25–8 116.15 MRI
2010–11 34 of 346 25–12 118.88 MRI
2009–10 98 of 335 21–10 68.35 MRI
2008–09 205 of 330 12–19 19.73 MRI
2007–08 217 of 328 12–20 7.98 MRI
2006–07 323 of 326 2–28 -67.91 MRI
2005–06 49 of 326 23–8 99.00 MRI
2004–05 172 of 326 15–15 28.03 MRI