The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Jacksonville

ASUN · 12–20

Power-8.6#287 of 365
Résumé-8.17#666 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLipscomb (70–65)
Worst lossFlorida A&M (65–72)
Schedule faced-6.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Miami L 69–86 -24.9 +7.9
1 vs Trinity (FL) non-D1 W 132–45 +32.0 +55.0
2 at High Point L 64–85 -22.2 +1.2
2 at VMI W 69–67 +6.6 -4.6
3 at George Mason L 57–79 -18.3 -3.7
4 N Bethune-Cookman W 69–64 -2.0 +7.0
4 N Pacific L 53–68 -8.9 -6.1
5 vs Florida A&M W 85–82 +7.0 -4.0
5 at Florida International L 65–88 -8.7 -14.3
6 vs Trinity Baptist non-D1 W 122–49 +32.0 +41.0
7 at Texas A&M L 75–112 -27.0 -10.0
7 at Florida A&M L 65–72 +1.5 -8.5
8 at Florida State L 63–87 -20.1 -3.9
9 at Lipscomb L 57–76 -12.0 -7.0
9 at Austin Peay L 68–71 -11.0 +8.0
10 vs Queens University L 51–77 -4.0 -22.0
10 vs West Georgia W 75–43 +5.9 +26.1
11 at Central Arkansas L 60–62 -9.6 +7.6
11 at North Alabama W 90–68 +1.4 +20.6
12 vs Bellarmine L 70–77 +3.5 -10.5
12 vs Eastern Kentucky W 81–76 +1.7 +3.3
13 vs Lipscomb W 70–65 -6.5 +11.5
13 vs Florida Gulf Coast L 49–68 -1.6 -17.4
14 at Queens University L 84–93 -9.5 +0.5
14 at West Georgia L 73–87 +0.4 -14.4
15 at Stetson L 62–67 +1.2 -6.2
15 vs North Florida W 63–56 +7.5 -0.5
16 at Florida Gulf Coast L 84–86 -7.1 +5.1
16 vs Austin Peay L 61–65 -5.6 +1.6
17 vs Stetson W 89–85 +6.7 -2.7
17 at North Florida W 85–61 +2.0 +22.0
18 N Bellarmine L 79–82 +0.8 -3.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #82 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #270 of 326 (16-13)2005–06: #322 of 326 (1-26)2006–07: #179 of 326 (15-14)2007–08: #173 of 328 (18-13)2008–09: #82 of 330 (18-14)2009–10: #119 of 335 (20-13)2010–11: #126 of 346 (20-12)2011–12: #283 of 345 (8-22)2012–13: #266 of 347 (12-18)2013–14: #292 of 351 (12-18)2014–15: #333 of 351 (10-22)2015–16: #223 of 351 (16-16)2016–17: #231 of 351 (17-16)2017–18: #283 of 351 (15-18)2018–19: #279 of 353 (10-20)2019–20: #217 of 353 (12-18)2020–21: #276 of 347 (11-13)2021–22: #177 of 358 (21-10)2022–23: #214 of 363 (13-16)2023–24: #252 of 362 (16-17)2024–25: #215 of 364 (19-14)2025–26: #287 of 365 (12-20) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 287 of 365 12–20 -8.62 Power
2024–25 215 of 364 19–14 -3.33 Power
2023–24 252 of 362 16–17 -5.34 Power
2022–23 214 of 363 13–16 -2.77 Power
2021–22 177 of 358 21–10 -0.18 Power
2020–21 276 of 347 11–13 -7.51 Power
2019–20 217 of 353 12–18 11.08 MRI
2018–19 279 of 353 10–20 -18.77 MRI
2017–18 283 of 351 15–18 -15.15 MRI
2016–17 231 of 351 17–16 11.37 MRI
2015–16 223 of 351 16–16 10.13 MRI
2014–15 333 of 351 10–22 -53.61 MRI
2013–14 292 of 351 12–18 -21.55 MRI
2012–13 266 of 347 12–18 -18.33 MRI
2011–12 283 of 345 8–22 -18.51 MRI
2010–11 126 of 346 20–12 56.40 MRI
2009–10 119 of 335 20–13 59.67 MRI
2008–09 82 of 330 18–14 79.12 MRI
2007–08 173 of 328 18–13 30.06 MRI
2006–07 179 of 326 15–14 26.54 MRI
2005–06 322 of 326 1–26 -81.45 MRI
2004–05 270 of 326 16–13 -12.77 MRI