The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Massachusetts

MAC · 17–16

Power-1.8#195 of 365
Résumé-2.80#577 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winFlorida State (103–95)
Worst lossNorthern Illinois (68–70)
Schedule faced-3.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Marshall L 72–78 +2.0 -8.0
1 vs UAlbany W 83–62 +10.5 +10.5
2 vs Le Moyne W 94–80 +11.6 +2.4
2 vs Central Connecticut W 84–77 +8.8 -1.8
3 N Charleston L 65–69 -2.2 -1.8
3 N Green Bay L 75–79 +3.5 -7.5
4 N Oregon State W 73–65 -1.3 +9.3
5 vs Harvard W 78–71 +1.2 +5.8
5 vs UMass Lowell W 80–60 +9.0 +11.0
6 N Boston College W 76–74 -0.2 +2.2
6 N Florida State W 103–95 -10.5 +18.5
7 vs Kent State L 59–69 -1.2 -8.8
8 vs Massachusetts-Boston non-D1 W 91–40 +38.8 +12.2
9 at Eastern Michigan L 74–80 +1.9 -7.9
9 vs Bowling Green L 100–101 +0.2 -1.2
10 at Ohio L 83–86 -0.7 -2.3
10 vs Ball State W 79–71 +10.0 -2.0
11 at Western Michigan W 85–82 +4.9 -1.9
11 at Northern Illinois L 68–70 +10.4 -12.4
12 vs Toledo W 84–82 -1.3 +3.3
12 at Buffalo W 68–67 +0.3 +0.7
13 at Miami (OH) L 84–86 -12.9 +10.9
13 vs Eastern Michigan W 70–67 +7.4 -4.4
14 vs Central Michigan W 95–89 +8.2 -2.2
14 at Coastal Carolina L 91–94 +1.8 -4.8
15 at Akron L 92–99 -16.3 +9.3
16 vs Miami (OH) L 77–86 -7.4 -1.6
16 vs Buffalo L 82–86 +5.8 -9.8
17 at Ball State L 73–74 +4.6 -5.6
17 at Bowling Green L 62–81 -5.2 -13.8
18 vs Ohio W 94–82 +4.8 +7.2
19 N Miami (OH) W 87–83 -10.2 +14.2
19 N Toledo L 67–77 -4.0 -6.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #49 in 2006–07. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #205 of 326 (15-12)2005–06: #130 of 326 (13-15)2006–07: #49 of 326 (24-9)2007–08: #55 of 328 (25-11)2008–09: #219 of 330 (12-18)2009–10: #222 of 335 (12-20)2010–11: #201 of 346 (15-15)2011–12: #79 of 345 (24-12)2012–13: #101 of 347 (21-11)2013–14: #60 of 351 (24-9)2014–15: #161 of 351 (17-15)2015–16: #211 of 351 (14-18)2016–17: #206 of 351 (15-18)2017–18: #255 of 351 (13-20)2018–19: #233 of 353 (11-21)2019–20: #209 of 353 (14-17)2020–21: #154 of 347 (8-7)2021–22: #205 of 358 (15-17)2022–23: #208 of 363 (15-16)2023–24: #101 of 362 (20-11)2024–25: #204 of 364 (12-20)2025–26: #195 of 365 (17-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 195 of 365 17–16 -1.77 Power
2024–25 204 of 364 12–20 -2.39 Power
2023–24 101 of 362 20–11 5.58 Power
2022–23 208 of 363 15–16 -2.32 Power
2021–22 205 of 358 15–17 -2.09 Power
2020–21 154 of 347 8–7 1.13 Power
2019–20 209 of 353 14–17 14.47 MRI
2018–19 233 of 353 11–21 0.98 MRI
2017–18 255 of 351 13–20 0.13 MRI
2016–17 206 of 351 15–18 26.12 MRI
2015–16 211 of 351 14–18 15.97 MRI
2014–15 161 of 351 17–15 38.53 MRI
2013–14 60 of 351 24–9 94.49 MRI
2012–13 101 of 347 21–11 58.94 MRI
2011–12 79 of 345 24–12 82.53 MRI
2010–11 201 of 346 15–15 23.96 MRI
2009–10 222 of 335 12–20 9.97 MRI
2008–09 219 of 330 12–18 9.36 MRI
2007–08 55 of 328 25–11 99.46 MRI
2006–07 49 of 326 24–9 109.06 MRI
2005–06 130 of 326 13–15 46.53 MRI
2004–05 205 of 326 15–12 17.56 MRI