The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Towson

CAA · 19–15

Power+1.0#149 of 365
Résumé+0.12#165 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLiberty (72–69)
Worst lossNorth Carolina A&T (73–80)
Schedule faced-2.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Loyola Maryland W 67–56 +13.1 -2.1
1 at Houston L 48–65 -29.9 +12.9
2 vs Wilson College non-D1 W 101–62 +41.6 -2.6
2 vs Norfolk State W 51–41 +11.5 -1.5
3 at James Madison L 75–81 +0.3 -6.3
4 N Rhode Island W 62–55 -0.3 +7.3
4 N Liberty W 72–69 -4.7 +7.7
4 N UC San Diego L 73–87 -3.7 -10.3
5 vs Cornell W 93–80 +0.7 +12.2
5 at UCF L 61–86 -13.0 -12.0
7 at Kansas L 49–73 -22.0 -2.0
7 vs Notre Dame (Md) non-D1 W 107–60 +41.6 +5.4
8 vs Sacred Heart W 72–47 +11.9 +13.1
9 at William & Mary L 70–84 -2.6 -11.3
9 at Hampton L 62–63 +5.5 -6.5
9 vs Monmouth L 48–62 +5.8 -19.8
10 vs Hofstra L 67–78 -2.7 -8.3
10 at Northeastern W 87–78 +7.4 +1.6
11 vs Charleston W 61–52 +3.3 +5.7
12 vs Drexel W 59–58 +7.2 -6.2
12 at Elon W 72–59 +3.0 +10.0
12 at North Carolina A&T L 73–80 +9.1 -16.1
13 vs UNC Wilmington L 73–82 -1.3 -7.7
13 vs Hampton W 82–50 +10.9 +21.1
14 at Hofstra L 49–71 -8.1 -13.9
15 vs Stony Brook W 69–57 +10.5 +1.5
16 at Monmouth L 71–72 +0.3 -1.3
16 at Drexel L 62–68 +1.8 -7.8
17 vs Elon W 58–56 +8.4 -6.4
17 vs Campbell W 71–67 +6.3 -2.3
18 at Stony Brook W 69–57 +5.0 +7.0
18 N Hampton W 74–68 +8.2 -2.2
18 N Charleston W 81–56 +0.6 +24.4
19 N Hofstra L 65–68 -5.4 +2.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #83 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #307 of 326 (5-24)2005–06: #269 of 326 (12-16)2006–07: #171 of 326 (15-17)2007–08: #243 of 328 (13-18)2008–09: #283 of 330 (12-22)2009–10: #298 of 335 (10-21)2010–11: #304 of 346 (4-26)2011–12: #341 of 345 (1-31)2012–13: #144 of 347 (17-13)2013–14: #95 of 351 (25-11)2014–15: #232 of 351 (12-20)2015–16: #116 of 351 (20-13)2016–17: #83 of 351 (20-13)2017–18: #99 of 351 (18-14)2018–19: #251 of 353 (9-22)2019–20: #129 of 353 (17-13)2020–21: #284 of 347 (4-14)2021–22: #94 of 358 (25-9)2022–23: #112 of 363 (21-12)2023–24: #145 of 362 (20-14)2024–25: #148 of 364 (22-11)2025–26: #149 of 365 (19-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 149 of 365 19–15 0.99 Power
2024–25 148 of 364 22–11 1.32 Power
2023–24 145 of 362 20–14 2.27 Power
2022–23 112 of 363 21–12 4.33 Power
2021–22 94 of 358 25–9 6.07 Power
2020–21 284 of 347 4–14 -8.09 Power
2019–20 129 of 353 17–13 50.74 MRI
2018–19 251 of 353 9–22 -5.61 MRI
2017–18 99 of 351 18–14 74.87 MRI
2016–17 83 of 351 20–13 80.79 MRI
2015–16 116 of 351 20–13 63.90 MRI
2014–15 232 of 351 12–20 11.68 MRI
2013–14 95 of 351 25–11 72.21 MRI
2012–13 144 of 347 17–13 40.41 MRI
2011–12 341 of 345 1–31 -95.04 MRI
2010–11 304 of 346 4–26 -31.99 MRI
2009–10 298 of 335 10–21 -33.58 MRI
2008–09 283 of 330 12–22 -19.98 MRI
2007–08 243 of 328 13–18 -5.83 MRI
2006–07 171 of 326 15–17 29.05 MRI
2005–06 269 of 326 12–16 -13.26 MRI
2004–05 307 of 326 5–24 -42.49 MRI