The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Georgia Southern

Sun Belt · 21–16

Power-5.1#238 of 365
Résumé-2.88#579 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winArkansas State (80–77)
Worst lossUTSA (64–77)
Schedule faced-6.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-18.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at East Carolina L 89–92 -0.4 -2.6
1 vs UNC Asheville W 93–90 +1.6 +1.4
2 at Florida Gulf Coast W 95–94 -3.6 +4.6
2 vs Johnson C Smith non-D1 W 98–79 +35.5 -16.5
3 at Georgia Tech L 66–68 -6.7 +4.7
3 at Florida State L 72–98 -16.6 -9.4
4 N Youngstown State L 61–67 -3.5 -2.5
4 N UTSA L 64–77 +9.6 -22.6
4 vs Houston Christian W 80–62 +9.9 +8.1
5 vs Louisiana Tech W 77–69 -1.7 +9.7
5 at Gardner-Webb W 88–84 +13.2 -9.2
6 vs Coastal Georgia non-D1 W 100–58 +35.5 +6.5
6 at West Georgia W 91–85 +3.9 +2.1
7 vs Georgia State W 90–67 +7.5 +15.5
7 vs James Madison W 96–92 -0.4 +4.4
9 at Coastal Carolina W 82–81 -1.6 +2.6
9 at Old Dominion W 93–86 -1.4 +8.4
10 at South Alabama L 71–87 -8.0 -8.0
11 vs Old Dominion W 87–84 +4.1 -1.1
11 vs Coastal Carolina L 75–79 +3.9 -7.9
12 vs Arkansas State L 68–85 -6.3 -10.7
12 vs Troy L 78–83 -6.0 +1.0
13 N UL Monroe W 79–76 +13.7 -10.7
13 at Louisiana L 60–69 +4.1 -13.1
14 vs Texas State L 71–77 +2.1 -8.1
15 vs App State L 65–81 -1.6 -14.4
15 vs Marshall W 101–87 -1.3 +15.3
16 at Georgia State L 64–66 +2.1 -4.1
16 at App State L 74–89 -7.1 -7.9
17 at James Madison L 66–82 -5.8 -10.2
17 at Marshall W 99–82 -6.8 +23.8
18 N Old Dominion W 88–84 +1.4 +2.6
18 N Arkansas State W 80–77 -9.0 +12.0
18 N South Alabama W 94–85 -5.3 +14.3
18 N Coastal Carolina W 96–72 +1.2 +22.8
19 N Marshall W 82–78 -4.1 +8.1
19 N Troy L 61–77 -8.8 -7.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
13 at UL Monroe +10.9 84%

Season by season

Best finish: #94 in 2014–15. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #117 of 326 (18-12)2005–06: #114 of 326 (20-10)2006–07: #189 of 326 (15-16)2007–08: #111 of 328 (20-12)2008–09: #304 of 330 (8-22)2009–10: #320 of 335 (9-23)2010–11: #336 of 346 (5-27)2011–12: #226 of 345 (15-15)2012–13: #270 of 347 (12-19)2013–14: #264 of 351 (15-19)2014–15: #94 of 351 (22-9)2015–16: #206 of 351 (14-17)2016–17: #201 of 351 (18-15)2017–18: #110 of 351 (21-12)2018–19: #102 of 353 (19-12)2019–20: #139 of 353 (18-13)2020–21: #190 of 347 (13-13)2021–22: #222 of 358 (13-16)2022–23: #205 of 363 (17-16)2023–24: #282 of 362 (9-24)2024–25: #264 of 364 (17-16)2025–26: #238 of 365 (21-16) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 238 of 365 21–16 -5.14 Power
2024–25 264 of 364 17–16 -6.53 Power
2023–24 282 of 362 9–24 -7.21 Power
2022–23 205 of 363 17–16 -2.14 Power
2021–22 222 of 358 13–16 -3.49 Power
2020–21 190 of 347 13–13 -1.57 Power
2019–20 139 of 353 18–13 46.27 MRI
2018–19 102 of 353 19–12 64.36 MRI
2017–18 110 of 351 21–12 64.90 MRI
2016–17 201 of 351 18–15 28.09 MRI
2015–16 206 of 351 14–17 19.08 MRI
2014–15 94 of 351 22–9 73.01 MRI
2013–14 264 of 351 15–19 -4.10 MRI
2012–13 270 of 347 12–19 -20.38 MRI
2011–12 226 of 345 15–15 11.90 MRI
2010–11 336 of 346 5–27 -75.57 MRI
2009–10 320 of 335 9–23 -60.73 MRI
2008–09 304 of 330 8–22 -40.79 MRI
2007–08 111 of 328 20–12 61.78 MRI
2006–07 189 of 326 15–16 21.90 MRI
2005–06 114 of 326 20–10 55.34 MRI
2004–05 117 of 326 18–12 52.47 MRI