Wake Forest
ACC · 2–1
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +5.1 avg | × 27% | +1.4 |
| Opponents faced | +0.6 avg | × 27% | +0.2 |
| Preseason prior | +10.7 | × 73% | +7.7 |
| Power | +9.3 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vs | Maryland Eastern Shore | W 83–62 | +28.6 | -7.6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | at | Vanderbilt | L 51–74 | -20.8 | -2.2 | +0.4 |
| 3 | vs | Charleston Southern | W 82–64 | +21.2 | -3.2 | +0.8 |
| Preseason prior (73% of the rating) | +7.7 | |||||
| Power | +9.3 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | vs | Southern Utah | +18.5 | 95% |
| 4 | vs | Monmouth | +14.0 | 90% |
| 4 | vs | Western Carolina | +14.3 | 90% |
| 5 | N | Mississippi State | -5.0 | 32% |
| 6 | at | LSU | -7.9 | 24% |
| 6 | N | Massachusetts | +11.7 | 86% |
| 7 | vs | Hampton | +20.9 | 97% |
| 8 | vs | Gardner-Webb | +30.9 | 100% |
Season by season
Best finish: #9 in 2004–05. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 18–17 | #65 of 365 · 10.20 | – |
| 2024–25 | 21–11 | #64 of 364 · 10.31 | – |
| 2023–24 | 21–14 | #40 of 362 · 13.27 | – |
| 2022–23 | 19–14 | #81 of 363 · 8.49 | – |
| 2021–22 | 25–10 | #49 of 358 · 10.80 | – |
| 2020–21 | 6–16 | #221 of 347 · -3.44 | – |
| 2019–20 | 13–18 | – | #180 of 353 · 32.55 |
| 2018–19 | 11–20 | – | #221 of 353 · 6.14 |
| 2017–18 | 11–20 | – | #178 of 351 · 34.58 |
| 2016–17 | 19–13 | – | #53 of 351 · 98.93 |
| 2015–16 | 11–20 | – | #235 of 351 · 3.25 |
| 2014–15 | 13–19 | – | #163 of 351 · 38.11 |
| 2013–14 | 17–16 | – | #169 of 351 · 38.16 |
| 2012–13 | 13–18 | – | #198 of 347 · 19.36 |
| 2011–12 | 13–18 | – | #258 of 345 · -6.23 |
| 2010–11 | 8–24 | – | #324 of 346 · -55.65 |
| 2009–10 | 20–11 | – | #77 of 335 · 85.35 |
| 2008–09 | 24–7 | – | #26 of 330 · 129.84 |
| 2007–08 | 17–13 | – | #94 of 328 · 71.07 |
| 2006–07 | 15–16 | – | #167 of 326 · 30.18 |
| 2005–06 | 17–17 | – | #88 of 326 · 72.22 |
| 2004–05 | 27–6 | – | #9 of 326 · 159.59 |