The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Mississippi Valley State

SWAC · 3–30

Power-29.9#365 of 365
Résumé-19.62#727 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTexas Southern (72–71)
Worst lossUL Monroe (52–66)
Schedule faced-8.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at UAB L 55–106 -36.9 -14.1
1 vs Mississippi University For Women non-D1 W 97–61 +10.7 +25.3
1 at Murray State L 60–108 -36.1 -11.9
2 at Hawai'i L 56–88 -35.7 +3.7
2 N Utah Tech L 75–81 -25.8 +19.8
2 N Manhattan L 73–80 -17.0 +10.0
3 at Cal State Bakersfield L 70–86 -17.9 +1.9
4 at Texas A&M L 84–120 -48.2 +12.2
5 at UL Monroe L 52–66 -13.8 -0.2
6 at Kansas State L 49–108 -37.5 -21.5
7 vs Tarleton State L 64–88 -22.1 -1.9
7 at Florida State L 49–96 -41.3 -5.7
8 at West Virginia L 51–86 -44.4 +9.4
9 at Oklahoma L 69–93 -46.5 +22.5
9 vs Alabama State L 69–89 -14.8 -5.2
10 vs Alabama A&M L 51–71 -14.4 -5.6
10 at Prairie View A&M L 69–70 -21.6 +20.6
11 at Texas Southern L 51–84 -20.9 -12.1
11 vs Bethune-Cookman L 63–79 -20.5 +4.5
12 vs Florida A&M L 48–62 -14.3 +0.3
13 at Southern L 69–80 -25.1 +14.1
13 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff L 70–78 -12.1 +4.1
14 vs Jackson State L 81–97 -11.3 -4.7
15 vs Alcorn State L 66–74 -9.3 +1.3
15 at Alabama A&M L 65–72 -19.9 +12.9
16 at Alabama State L 55–92 -20.3 -16.7
16 vs Prairie View A&M L 62–72 -16.1 +6.1
16 vs Texas Southern W 72–71 -15.4 +16.4
17 at Grambling L 62–83 -22.9 +1.9
17 at Arkansas-Pine Bluff W 70–69 -17.5 +18.5
18 at Alcorn State L 64–67 -14.8 +11.8
18 at Jackson State L 77–85 -16.7 +8.7
19 N Grambling L 52–77 -20.2 -4.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #179 in 2011–12. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #183 of 326 (13-15)2005–06: #302 of 326 (9-19)2006–07: #202 of 326 (18-16)2007–08: #227 of 328 (17-16)2008–09: #319 of 330 (7-25)2009–10: #319 of 335 (9-23)2010–11: #292 of 346 (13-19)2011–12: #179 of 345 (20-12)2012–13: #330 of 347 (5-23)2013–14: #345 of 351 (9-23)2014–15: #348 of 351 (6-26)2015–16: #342 of 351 (8-27)2016–17: #342 of 351 (7-25)2017–18: #345 of 351 (4-28)2018–19: #349 of 353 (5-26)2019–20: #353 of 353 (3-27)2020–21: #347 of 347 (2-22)2021–22: #358 of 358 (2-26)2022–23: #361 of 363 (5-27)2023–24: #362 of 362 (1-30)2024–25: #364 of 364 (3-28)2025–26: #365 of 365 (3-30) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 365 of 365 3–30 -29.87 Power
2024–25 364 of 364 3–28 -31.15 Power
2023–24 362 of 362 1–30 -24.90 Power
2022–23 361 of 363 5–27 -19.87 Power
2021–22 358 of 358 2–26 -24.55 Power
2020–21 347 of 347 2–22 -31.40 Power
2019–20 353 of 353 3–27 -158.60 MRI
2018–19 349 of 353 5–26 -110.96 MRI
2017–18 345 of 351 4–28 -93.49 MRI
2016–17 342 of 351 7–25 -74.33 MRI
2015–16 342 of 351 8–27 -72.68 MRI
2014–15 348 of 351 6–26 -113.82 MRI
2013–14 345 of 351 9–23 -74.50 MRI
2012–13 330 of 347 5–23 -67.70 MRI
2011–12 179 of 345 20–12 31.87 MRI
2010–11 292 of 346 13–19 -22.24 MRI
2009–10 319 of 335 9–23 -60.06 MRI
2008–09 319 of 330 7–25 -66.91 MRI
2007–08 227 of 328 17–16 3.75 MRI
2006–07 202 of 326 18–16 16.65 MRI
2005–06 302 of 326 9–19 -41.09 MRI
2004–05 183 of 326 13–15 24.44 MRI