The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UCF

Big 12 · 21–12

Power+11.3#54 of 365
Résumé+11.95#38 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTexas Tech (88–80)
Worst lossOklahoma State (76–87)
Schedule faced+10.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Hofstra W 82–78 +7.6 -3.6
1 vs Vanderbilt L 93–105 -7.6 -4.4
2 vs Florida A&M W 97–60 +26.9 +10.1
2 at Texas A&M W 86–74 -7.0 +19.0
3 vs Oakland W 87–83 +13.8 -9.8
3 N Pittsburgh W 77–67 +5.7 +4.3
4 vs Quinnipiac W 102–91 +15.7 -4.7
4 vs VMI W 82–57 +32.0 -7.0
5 vs Towson W 86–61 +13.0 +12.0
7 vs Mercer W 81–63 +13.3 +4.7
7 vs Florida Gulf Coast W 102–80 +18.3 +3.7
8 vs Florida Atlantic W 85–80 +9.9 -4.9
9 vs Kansas W 81–75 -6.2 +12.2
10 at Oklahoma State L 76–87 +0.7 -11.7
10 vs Cincinnati W 73–72 -0.4 +1.4
11 at Kansas State W 82–73 +3.6 +5.4
11 vs Arizona L 77–84 -17.3 +10.3
12 at Iowa State L 57–87 -18.1 -11.9
12 at Colorado W 95–86 -0.0 +9.0
13 vs Arizona State W 79–76 +5.7 -2.7
13 vs Texas Tech W 88–80 -7.5 +15.5
14 at Houston L 55–79 -19.6 -4.4
14 at Cincinnati L 72–92 -5.8 -14.2
15 vs West Virginia L 67–74 +2.2 -9.2
16 vs TCU W 82–71 +1.1 +9.9
16 at Utah W 73–71 +5.7 -3.7
17 at BYU W 97–84 -10.6 +23.6
17 vs Baylor L 86–87 +0.6 -1.6
18 vs Oklahoma State L 104–111 +6.2 -13.2
18 at West Virginia L 62–77 -3.2 -11.8
19 N Cincinnati W 66–65 -3.1 +4.1
19 N Arizona L 59–81 -20.1 -1.9
20 N UCLA L 71–75 -5.8 +1.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #34 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #106 of 326 (24-9)2005–06: #168 of 326 (14-15)2006–07: #81 of 326 (22-9)2007–08: #109 of 328 (16-15)2008–09: #143 of 330 (17-14)2009–10: #192 of 335 (15-17)2010–11: #85 of 346 (21-12)2011–12: #96 of 345 (22-11)2012–13: #107 of 347 (18-11)2013–14: #195 of 351 (13-18)2014–15: #307 of 351 (12-18)2015–16: #236 of 351 (12-18)2016–17: #54 of 351 (24-12)2017–18: #121 of 351 (19-13)2018–19: #34 of 353 (24-9)2019–20: #142 of 353 (16-14)2020–21: #132 of 347 (11-12)2021–22: #118 of 358 (18-12)2022–23: #72 of 363 (19-15)2023–24: #63 of 362 (17-16)2024–25: #74 of 364 (19-18)2025–26: #54 of 365 (21-12) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 54 of 365 21–12 11.30 Power
2024–25 74 of 364 19–18 8.49 Power
2023–24 63 of 362 17–16 9.77 Power
2022–23 72 of 363 19–15 9.15 Power
2021–22 118 of 358 18–12 4.13 Power
2020–21 132 of 347 11–12 2.46 Power
2019–20 142 of 353 16–14 45.22 MRI
2018–19 34 of 353 24–9 112.92 MRI
2017–18 121 of 351 19–13 60.29 MRI
2016–17 54 of 351 24–12 98.40 MRI
2015–16 236 of 351 12–18 3.22 MRI
2014–15 307 of 351 12–18 -27.82 MRI
2013–14 195 of 351 13–18 29.34 MRI
2012–13 107 of 347 18–11 56.29 MRI
2011–12 96 of 345 22–11 73.46 MRI
2010–11 85 of 346 21–12 78.68 MRI
2009–10 192 of 335 15–17 23.29 MRI
2008–09 143 of 330 17–14 43.21 MRI
2007–08 109 of 328 16–15 66.02 MRI
2006–07 81 of 326 22–9 81.99 MRI
2005–06 168 of 326 14–15 30.82 MRI
2004–05 106 of 326 24–9 56.74 MRI