Oregon
Big Ten · 12–20
Power+7.2#87 of 365
Résumé+3.65#106 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWisconsin (85–71)
Worst lossRutgers (85–88)
Schedule faced+11.1 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs | Hawai'i | W 60–59 | +6.8 | -5.8 |
| 1 | vs | Rice | W 67–63 | +15.1 | -11.1 |
| 2 | vs | South Dakota State | W 83–69 | +11.0 | +3.0 |
| 3 | vs | Oregon State | W 87–75 | +10.4 | +1.6 |
| 4 | N | Auburn | L 73–84 | -11.3 | +0.3 |
| 4 | N | San Diego State | L 80–97 | -6.6 | -10.4 |
| 4 | N | Creighton | L 66–76 | -2.2 | -7.8 |
| 5 | vs | USC | L 77–82 | +1.2 | -6.2 |
| 5 | at | UCLA | L 63–74 | -12.6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | vs | UC Davis | W 104–62 | +11.5 | +30.5 |
| 7 | vs | Portland | W 94–69 | +16.1 | +8.9 |
| 7 | N | Gonzaga | L 82–91 | -17.6 | +8.6 |
| 9 | vs | Omaha | W 80–57 | +15.4 | +7.6 |
| 9 | at | Maryland | W 64–54 | -0.9 | +10.8 |
| 10 | at | Rutgers | L 85–88 | +1.7 | -4.7 |
| 10 | vs | Ohio State | L 62–72 | -7.7 | -2.3 |
| 11 | at | Nebraska | L 55–90 | -16.5 | -18.5 |
| 11 | vs | Michigan | L 71–81 | -22.7 | +12.7 |
| 12 | vs | Michigan State | L 52–68 | -14.5 | -1.5 |
| 12 | at | Washington | L 57–72 | -6.4 | -8.6 |
| 13 | vs | UCLA | L 57–73 | -7.2 | -8.8 |
| 14 | vs | Iowa | L 66–84 | -7.9 | -10.1 |
| 14 | at | Purdue | L 64–68 | -21.1 | +17.1 |
| 15 | at | Indiana | L 74–92 | -9.8 | -8.2 |
| 15 | vs | Penn State | W 83–72 | +7.4 | +3.6 |
| 16 | vs | Minnesota | L 44–61 | +2.8 | -19.8 |
| 16 | at | USC | W 71–70 | -4.3 | +5.3 |
| 17 | vs | Wisconsin | W 85–71 | -9.6 | +23.6 |
| 17 | at | Northwestern | L 62–63 | -5.9 | +4.9 |
| 18 | at | Illinois | L 54–80 | -22.2 | -3.8 |
| 18 | vs | Washington | W 85–79 | -0.9 | +6.9 |
| 19 | N | Maryland | L 60–70 | +1.9 | -11.9 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #9 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 87 of 365 | 12–20 | 7.17 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 30 of 364 | 25–10 | 16.13 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 55 of 362 | 24–12 | 11.05 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 51 of 363 | 21–15 | 11.04 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 65 of 358 | 20–15 | 9.66 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 21 of 347 | 21–7 | 13.62 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 12 of 353 | 24–7 | 129.43 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 20 of 353 | 25–13 | 138.85 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 56 of 351 | 23–13 | 101.17 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 9 of 351 | 33–6 | 185.89 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 9 of 351 | 31–7 | 178.08 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 56 of 351 | 26–10 | 94.70 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 32 of 351 | 24–10 | 130.81 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 36 of 347 | 26–8 | 117.68 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 63 of 345 | 24–10 | 92.54 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 119 of 346 | 21–18 | 59.84 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 135 of 335 | 16–16 | 50.98 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 276 of 330 | 8–23 | -15.81 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 87 of 328 | 18–14 | 74.58 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 13 of 326 | 29–8 | 147.00 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 102 of 326 | 15–18 | 62.41 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 126 of 326 | 14–13 | 48.76 | MRI |