The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Oregon

Big Ten · 12–20

Power+7.2#87 of 365
Résumé+3.65#106 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWisconsin (85–71)
Worst lossRutgers (85–88)
Schedule faced+11.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Hawai'i W 60–59 +6.8 -5.8
1 vs Rice W 67–63 +15.1 -11.1
2 vs South Dakota State W 83–69 +11.0 +3.0
3 vs Oregon State W 87–75 +10.4 +1.6
4 N Auburn L 73–84 -11.3 +0.3
4 N San Diego State L 80–97 -6.6 -10.4
4 N Creighton L 66–76 -2.2 -7.8
5 vs USC L 77–82 +1.2 -6.2
5 at UCLA L 63–74 -12.6 +1.6
6 vs UC Davis W 104–62 +11.5 +30.5
7 vs Portland W 94–69 +16.1 +8.9
7 N Gonzaga L 82–91 -17.6 +8.6
9 vs Omaha W 80–57 +15.4 +7.6
9 at Maryland W 64–54 -0.9 +10.8
10 at Rutgers L 85–88 +1.7 -4.7
10 vs Ohio State L 62–72 -7.7 -2.3
11 at Nebraska L 55–90 -16.5 -18.5
11 vs Michigan L 71–81 -22.7 +12.7
12 vs Michigan State L 52–68 -14.5 -1.5
12 at Washington L 57–72 -6.4 -8.6
13 vs UCLA L 57–73 -7.2 -8.8
14 vs Iowa L 66–84 -7.9 -10.1
14 at Purdue L 64–68 -21.1 +17.1
15 at Indiana L 74–92 -9.8 -8.2
15 vs Penn State W 83–72 +7.4 +3.6
16 vs Minnesota L 44–61 +2.8 -19.8
16 at USC W 71–70 -4.3 +5.3
17 vs Wisconsin W 85–71 -9.6 +23.6
17 at Northwestern L 62–63 -5.9 +4.9
18 at Illinois L 54–80 -22.2 -3.8
18 vs Washington W 85–79 -0.9 +6.9
19 N Maryland L 60–70 +1.9 -11.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #9 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #126 of 326 (14-13)2005–06: #102 of 326 (15-18)2006–07: #13 of 326 (29-8)2007–08: #87 of 328 (18-14)2008–09: #276 of 330 (8-23)2009–10: #135 of 335 (16-16)2010–11: #119 of 346 (21-18)2011–12: #63 of 345 (24-10)2012–13: #36 of 347 (26-8)2013–14: #32 of 351 (24-10)2014–15: #56 of 351 (26-10)2015–16: #9 of 351 (31-7)2016–17: #9 of 351 (33-6)2017–18: #56 of 351 (23-13)2018–19: #20 of 353 (25-13)2019–20: #12 of 353 (24-7)2020–21: #21 of 347 (21-7)2021–22: #65 of 358 (20-15)2022–23: #51 of 363 (21-15)2023–24: #55 of 362 (24-12)2024–25: #30 of 364 (25-10)2025–26: #87 of 365 (12-20) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 87 of 365 12–20 7.17 Power
2024–25 30 of 364 25–10 16.13 Power
2023–24 55 of 362 24–12 11.05 Power
2022–23 51 of 363 21–15 11.04 Power
2021–22 65 of 358 20–15 9.66 Power
2020–21 21 of 347 21–7 13.62 Power
2019–20 12 of 353 24–7 129.43 MRI
2018–19 20 of 353 25–13 138.85 MRI
2017–18 56 of 351 23–13 101.17 MRI
2016–17 9 of 351 33–6 185.89 MRI
2015–16 9 of 351 31–7 178.08 MRI
2014–15 56 of 351 26–10 94.70 MRI
2013–14 32 of 351 24–10 130.81 MRI
2012–13 36 of 347 26–8 117.68 MRI
2011–12 63 of 345 24–10 92.54 MRI
2010–11 119 of 346 21–18 59.84 MRI
2009–10 135 of 335 16–16 50.98 MRI
2008–09 276 of 330 8–23 -15.81 MRI
2007–08 87 of 328 18–14 74.58 MRI
2006–07 13 of 326 29–8 147.00 MRI
2005–06 102 of 326 15–18 62.41 MRI
2004–05 126 of 326 14–13 48.76 MRI