The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Hawai'i

Big West · 24–9

Power+3.1#128 of 365
Résumé+3.63#107 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUC Irvine (67–66)
Worst lossLong Beach State (75–84)
Schedule faced-5.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Oregon L 59–60 -6.8 +5.8
2 vs East Texas A&M W 100–74 +18.4 +7.6
2 vs Mississippi Valley State W 88–56 +35.7 -3.7
2 vs Manhattan W 86–56 +18.8 +11.2
2 vs Utah Tech W 68–62 +9.9 -3.9
3 vs Arizona State L 76–83 -2.5 -4.5
4 vs Hawai'i Pacific non-D1 W 88–76 +43.7 -31.7
4 vs North Dakota W 92–55 +13.0 +24.0
5 vs UC Davis W 75–69 +7.4 -1.4
5 vs Cal State Fullerton W 69–59 +10.4 -0.4
6 vs Hawai'i Hilo non-D1 W 98–46 +43.7 +8.3
6 vs UTEP W 66–61 +12.1 -7.1
9 at UC Riverside W 88–45 +7.4 +35.6
9 at UC San Diego L 73–83 -4.3 -5.7
10 vs UC Irvine W 67–66 -0.1 +1.1
11 at Cal Poly W 86–66 +5.7 +14.3
11 at UC Santa Barbara L 62–77 -0.3 -14.7
12 vs Cal State Bakersfield W 98–71 +20.6 +6.4
12 vs Cal State Northridge W 89–68 +6.9 +14.1
13 at UC Irvine L 76–87 -5.6 -5.4
13 at Long Beach State W 89–82 +8.7 -1.7
14 vs UC San Diego W 72–67 +1.2 +3.8
15 at Cal State Bakersfield W 89–74 +15.1 -0.1
15 at Cal State Northridge L 60–84 +1.5 -25.5
16 vs Cal Poly L 75–86 +11.2 -22.2
16 vs UC Santa Barbara W 78–75 +5.2 -2.2
17 at UC Davis W 77–73 +1.9 +2.1
17 at Cal State Fullerton W 87–85 +4.9 -2.9
18 vs UC Riverside W 93–74 +12.9 +6.1
18 vs Long Beach State L 75–84 +14.2 -23.2
19 N Cal State Fullerton W 78–63 +7.6 +7.4
19 N UC Irvine W 71–64 -2.9 +9.9
20 N Arkansas L 78–97 -17.9 -1.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #34 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 250 2004–05: #136 of 326 (16-13)2005–06: #119 of 326 (17-11)2006–07: #86 of 326 (17-13)2007–08: #232 of 328 (11-19)2008–09: #182 of 330 (13-17)2009–10: #240 of 335 (10-20)2010–11: #163 of 346 (19-13)2011–12: #213 of 345 (16-17)2012–13: #167 of 347 (16-14)2013–14: #85 of 351 (20-11)2014–15: #106 of 351 (22-13)2015–16: #34 of 351 (28-6)2016–17: #223 of 351 (14-16)2017–18: #179 of 351 (17-13)2018–19: #160 of 353 (16-13)2019–20: #165 of 353 (16-12)2020–21: #193 of 347 (11-10)2021–22: #162 of 358 (17-11)2022–23: #143 of 363 (22-11)2023–24: #165 of 362 (20-14)2024–25: #233 of 364 (15-16)2025–26: #128 of 365 (24-9) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 250 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 128 of 365 24–9 3.10 Power
2024–25 233 of 364 15–16 -4.54 Power
2023–24 165 of 362 20–14 0.11 Power
2022–23 143 of 363 22–11 2.02 Power
2021–22 162 of 358 17–11 0.74 Power
2020–21 193 of 347 11–10 -1.87 Power
2019–20 165 of 353 16–12 36.97 MRI
2018–19 160 of 353 16–13 34.77 MRI
2017–18 179 of 351 17–13 34.19 MRI
2016–17 223 of 351 14–16 15.33 MRI
2015–16 34 of 351 28–6 124.38 MRI
2014–15 106 of 351 22–13 67.04 MRI
2013–14 85 of 351 20–11 78.85 MRI
2012–13 167 of 347 16–14 31.66 MRI
2011–12 213 of 345 16–17 15.77 MRI
2010–11 163 of 346 19–13 38.67 MRI
2009–10 240 of 335 10–20 4.73 MRI
2008–09 182 of 330 13–17 29.11 MRI
2007–08 232 of 328 11–19 0.27 MRI
2006–07 86 of 326 17–13 77.08 MRI
2005–06 119 of 326 17–11 54.50 MRI
2004–05 136 of 326 16–13 42.83 MRI