UAlbany
Am. East · 11–21
Power-9.5#297 of 365
Résumé-10.08#692 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winVermont (75–68)
Worst lossNew Hampshire (72–80)
Schedule faced-8.4 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at | Marquette | L 53–80 | -21.1 | -5.9 |
| 1 | at | Massachusetts | L 62–83 | -10.5 | -10.5 |
| 2 | vs | SUNY Delhi non-D1 | W 115–52 | +31.1 | +31.9 |
| 2 | at | Rhode Island | L 61–80 | -13.5 | -5.5 |
| 3 | vs | Paul Smith'S non-D1 | W 106–57 | +31.1 | +17.9 |
| 3 | at | Siena | L 63–73 | -11.4 | +1.4 |
| 4 | N | Colgate | L 67–69 | -5.6 | +3.6 |
| 4 | N | Fordham | L 68–88 | -7.9 | -12.1 |
| 4 | N | SUNY-Oneonta non-D1 | W 90–62 | +28.3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | at | Columbia | L 65–93 | -11.1 | -16.9 |
| 6 | N | Yale | L 82–93 | -19.8 | +8.8 |
| 6 | at | Florida Atlantic | L 79–105 | -16.4 | -9.6 |
| 7 | at | Stony Brook | W 71–55 | -5.5 | +21.5 |
| 7 | vs | Cornell | L 75–83 | -9.8 | +1.8 |
| 9 | at | South Carolina | L 67–96 | -17.7 | -11.3 |
| 9 | at | UMass Lowell | L 71–83 | -4.3 | -7.7 |
| 10 | vs | Bryant | W 71–46 | +5.6 | +19.4 |
| 11 | vs | Binghamton | W 69–53 | +11.0 | +5.0 |
| 12 | vs | Vermont | W 75–68 | -4.3 | +11.3 |
| 12 | at | Maine | L 49–52 | +0.3 | -3.3 |
| 12 | at | New Hampshire | L 72–80 | +2.4 | -10.3 |
| 13 | vs | NJIT | L 68–77 | +6.7 | -15.7 |
| 13 | vs | UMBC | L 65–68 | -5.8 | +2.8 |
| 14 | at | Bryant | W 65–63 | +0.2 | +1.8 |
| 14 | vs | UMass Lowell | L 79–89 | +1.2 | -11.2 |
| 15 | at | Binghamton | W 77–74 | +5.6 | -2.6 |
| 16 | at | NJIT | W 81–63 | +1.2 | +16.8 |
| 16 | at | UMBC | L 62–66 | -11.3 | +7.3 |
| 17 | vs | Maine | L 59–70 | +5.8 | -16.8 |
| 17 | vs | New Hampshire | W 84–61 | +7.8 | +15.2 |
| 18 | at | Vermont | L 56–69 | -9.8 | -3.2 |
| 18 | at | UMass Lowell | L 76–81 | -4.3 | -0.7 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #58 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 297 of 365 | 11–21 | -9.53 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 253 of 364 | 17–16 | -6.12 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 270 of 362 | 13–19 | -6.47 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 337 of 363 | 8–23 | -12.85 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 292 of 358 | 13–18 | -8.56 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 227 of 347 | 7–9 | -4.09 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 260 of 353 | 13–18 | -5.24 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 269 of 353 | 11–20 | -11.89 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 89 of 351 | 22–10 | 79.70 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 86 of 351 | 21–14 | 79.44 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 58 of 351 | 24–9 | 102.58 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 107 of 351 | 24–9 | 65.66 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 143 of 351 | 19–15 | 46.25 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 122 of 347 | 24–10 | 50.97 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 145 of 345 | 19–14 | 47.71 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 234 of 346 | 16–16 | 5.82 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 292 of 335 | 7–25 | -26.19 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 173 of 330 | 15–16 | 31.55 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 138 of 328 | 15–15 | 48.94 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 105 of 326 | 23–10 | 62.08 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 100 of 326 | 21–11 | 63.24 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 137 of 326 | 13–14 | 42.44 | MRI |