The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UAlbany

Am. East · 11–21

Power-9.5#297 of 365
Résumé-10.08#692 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winVermont (75–68)
Worst lossNew Hampshire (72–80)
Schedule faced-8.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Marquette L 53–80 -21.1 -5.9
1 at Massachusetts L 62–83 -10.5 -10.5
2 vs SUNY Delhi non-D1 W 115–52 +31.1 +31.9
2 at Rhode Island L 61–80 -13.5 -5.5
3 vs Paul Smith'S non-D1 W 106–57 +31.1 +17.9
3 at Siena L 63–73 -11.4 +1.4
4 N Colgate L 67–69 -5.6 +3.6
4 N Fordham L 68–88 -7.9 -12.1
4 N SUNY-Oneonta non-D1 W 90–62 +28.3 -0.3
5 at Columbia L 65–93 -11.1 -16.9
6 N Yale L 82–93 -19.8 +8.8
6 at Florida Atlantic L 79–105 -16.4 -9.6
7 at Stony Brook W 71–55 -5.5 +21.5
7 vs Cornell L 75–83 -9.8 +1.8
9 at South Carolina L 67–96 -17.7 -11.3
9 at UMass Lowell L 71–83 -4.3 -7.7
10 vs Bryant W 71–46 +5.6 +19.4
11 vs Binghamton W 69–53 +11.0 +5.0
12 vs Vermont W 75–68 -4.3 +11.3
12 at Maine L 49–52 +0.3 -3.3
12 at New Hampshire L 72–80 +2.4 -10.3
13 vs NJIT L 68–77 +6.7 -15.7
13 vs UMBC L 65–68 -5.8 +2.8
14 at Bryant W 65–63 +0.2 +1.8
14 vs UMass Lowell L 79–89 +1.2 -11.2
15 at Binghamton W 77–74 +5.6 -2.6
16 at NJIT W 81–63 +1.2 +16.8
16 at UMBC L 62–66 -11.3 +7.3
17 vs Maine L 59–70 +5.8 -16.8
17 vs New Hampshire W 84–61 +7.8 +15.2
18 at Vermont L 56–69 -9.8 -3.2
18 at UMass Lowell L 76–81 -4.3 -0.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #58 in 2015–16. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #137 of 326 (13-14)2005–06: #100 of 326 (21-11)2006–07: #105 of 326 (23-10)2007–08: #138 of 328 (15-15)2008–09: #173 of 330 (15-16)2009–10: #292 of 335 (7-25)2010–11: #234 of 346 (16-16)2011–12: #145 of 345 (19-14)2012–13: #122 of 347 (24-10)2013–14: #143 of 351 (19-15)2014–15: #107 of 351 (24-9)2015–16: #58 of 351 (24-9)2016–17: #86 of 351 (21-14)2017–18: #89 of 351 (22-10)2018–19: #269 of 353 (11-20)2019–20: #260 of 353 (13-18)2020–21: #227 of 347 (7-9)2021–22: #292 of 358 (13-18)2022–23: #337 of 363 (8-23)2023–24: #270 of 362 (13-19)2024–25: #253 of 364 (17-16)2025–26: #297 of 365 (11-21) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 297 of 365 11–21 -9.53 Power
2024–25 253 of 364 17–16 -6.12 Power
2023–24 270 of 362 13–19 -6.47 Power
2022–23 337 of 363 8–23 -12.85 Power
2021–22 292 of 358 13–18 -8.56 Power
2020–21 227 of 347 7–9 -4.09 Power
2019–20 260 of 353 13–18 -5.24 MRI
2018–19 269 of 353 11–20 -11.89 MRI
2017–18 89 of 351 22–10 79.70 MRI
2016–17 86 of 351 21–14 79.44 MRI
2015–16 58 of 351 24–9 102.58 MRI
2014–15 107 of 351 24–9 65.66 MRI
2013–14 143 of 351 19–15 46.25 MRI
2012–13 122 of 347 24–10 50.97 MRI
2011–12 145 of 345 19–14 47.71 MRI
2010–11 234 of 346 16–16 5.82 MRI
2009–10 292 of 335 7–25 -26.19 MRI
2008–09 173 of 330 15–16 31.55 MRI
2007–08 138 of 328 15–15 48.94 MRI
2006–07 105 of 326 23–10 62.08 MRI
2005–06 100 of 326 21–11 63.24 MRI
2004–05 137 of 326 13–14 42.44 MRI