The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Syracuse

ACC · 15–17

Power+6.0#96 of 365
Résumé+4.39#104 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTennessee (62–60)
Worst lossBoston College (73–81)
Schedule faced+8.1 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Binghamton W 85–47 +26.6 +11.4
1 vs Delaware State W 83–43 +28.6 +11.4
2 N Drexel W 80–50 +9.6 +20.4
3 vs Monmouth W 78–73 +10.8 -5.8
4 N Houston L 74–78 -22.1 +18.1
4 N Kansas L 60–71 -14.2 +3.2
4 N Iowa State L 64–95 -20.6 -10.4
5 vs Tennessee W 62–60 -14.3 +16.3
6 N Saint Joseph's W 71–63 +1.8 +6.2
6 vs Hofstra L 69–70 +2.4 -3.4
7 vs Mercyhurst W 76–62 +17.6 -3.6
7 vs Northeastern W 91–83 +17.9 -9.9
8 vs Stonehill W 77–48 +22.0 +7.0
9 vs Clemson L 61–64 -7.1 +4.1
10 at Georgia Tech W 82–72 +4.5 +5.5
10 at Pittsburgh W 83–72 -2.3 +13.3
11 vs Florida State W 94–86 +0.1 +7.9
11 at Boston College L 73–81 +4.9 -12.9
12 vs Virginia Tech L 74–76 -0.2 -1.8
12 vs Miami L 76–85 -4.8 -4.2
13 at NC State L 68–88 -10.5 -9.5
13 vs Notre Dame W 86–72 +3.8 +10.2
14 at North Carolina L 77–87 -14.4 +4.4
14 at Virginia L 59–72 -15.0 +2.0
15 vs California W 107–100 +1.7 +5.3
15 vs SMU W 79–78 -5.2 +6.2
16 at Duke L 64–101 -28.5 -8.5
16 vs North Carolina L 64–77 -8.9 -4.1
17 at Wake Forest L 83–88 -5.5 +0.5
18 at Louisville L 62–77 -16.6 +1.6
18 vs Pittsburgh L 69–71 +3.2 -5.2
19 N SMU L 69–86 -7.9 -9.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #4 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 150 2004–05: #20 of 326 (27-7)2005–06: #53 of 326 (23-12)2006–07: #39 of 326 (24-11)2007–08: #47 of 328 (21-14)2008–09: #21 of 330 (28-10)2009–10: #4 of 335 (30-5)2010–11: #22 of 346 (27-8)2011–12: #5 of 345 (34-3)2012–13: #9 of 347 (26-9)2013–14: #19 of 351 (28-6)2014–15: #73 of 351 (18-13)2015–16: #53 of 351 (23-14)2016–17: #70 of 351 (19-15)2017–18: #64 of 351 (23-14)2018–19: #50 of 353 (20-14)2019–20: #71 of 353 (18-14)2020–21: #60 of 347 (18-10)2021–22: #83 of 358 (16-17)2022–23: #111 of 363 (17-15)2023–24: #95 of 362 (20-12)2024–25: #134 of 364 (14-19)2025–26: #96 of 365 (15-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 96 of 365 15–17 6.04 Power
2024–25 134 of 364 14–19 2.44 Power
2023–24 95 of 362 20–12 5.96 Power
2022–23 111 of 363 17–15 4.34 Power
2021–22 83 of 358 16–17 7.63 Power
2020–21 60 of 347 18–10 8.94 Power
2019–20 71 of 353 18–14 82.96 MRI
2018–19 50 of 353 20–14 98.21 MRI
2017–18 64 of 351 23–14 95.45 MRI
2016–17 70 of 351 19–15 86.54 MRI
2015–16 53 of 351 23–14 105.58 MRI
2014–15 73 of 351 18–13 85.13 MRI
2013–14 19 of 351 28–6 151.62 MRI
2012–13 9 of 347 26–9 162.74 MRI
2011–12 5 of 345 34–3 181.01 MRI
2010–11 22 of 346 27–8 142.86 MRI
2009–10 4 of 335 30–5 203.86 MRI
2008–09 21 of 330 28–10 143.90 MRI
2007–08 47 of 328 21–14 105.48 MRI
2006–07 39 of 326 24–11 119.22 MRI
2005–06 53 of 326 23–12 95.43 MRI
2004–05 20 of 326 27–7 140.36 MRI