Syracuse
ACC · 15–17
Power+6.0#96 of 365
Résumé+4.39#104 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winTennessee (62–60)
Worst lossBoston College (73–81)
Schedule faced+8.1 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs | Binghamton | W 85–47 | +26.6 | +11.4 |
| 1 | vs | Delaware State | W 83–43 | +28.6 | +11.4 |
| 2 | N | Drexel | W 80–50 | +9.6 | +20.4 |
| 3 | vs | Monmouth | W 78–73 | +10.8 | -5.8 |
| 4 | N | Houston | L 74–78 | -22.1 | +18.1 |
| 4 | N | Kansas | L 60–71 | -14.2 | +3.2 |
| 4 | N | Iowa State | L 64–95 | -20.6 | -10.4 |
| 5 | vs | Tennessee | W 62–60 | -14.3 | +16.3 |
| 6 | N | Saint Joseph's | W 71–63 | +1.8 | +6.2 |
| 6 | vs | Hofstra | L 69–70 | +2.4 | -3.4 |
| 7 | vs | Mercyhurst | W 76–62 | +17.6 | -3.6 |
| 7 | vs | Northeastern | W 91–83 | +17.9 | -9.9 |
| 8 | vs | Stonehill | W 77–48 | +22.0 | +7.0 |
| 9 | vs | Clemson | L 61–64 | -7.1 | +4.1 |
| 10 | at | Georgia Tech | W 82–72 | +4.5 | +5.5 |
| 10 | at | Pittsburgh | W 83–72 | -2.3 | +13.3 |
| 11 | vs | Florida State | W 94–86 | +0.1 | +7.9 |
| 11 | at | Boston College | L 73–81 | +4.9 | -12.9 |
| 12 | vs | Virginia Tech | L 74–76 | -0.2 | -1.8 |
| 12 | vs | Miami | L 76–85 | -4.8 | -4.2 |
| 13 | at | NC State | L 68–88 | -10.5 | -9.5 |
| 13 | vs | Notre Dame | W 86–72 | +3.8 | +10.2 |
| 14 | at | North Carolina | L 77–87 | -14.4 | +4.4 |
| 14 | at | Virginia | L 59–72 | -15.0 | +2.0 |
| 15 | vs | California | W 107–100 | +1.7 | +5.3 |
| 15 | vs | SMU | W 79–78 | -5.2 | +6.2 |
| 16 | at | Duke | L 64–101 | -28.5 | -8.5 |
| 16 | vs | North Carolina | L 64–77 | -8.9 | -4.1 |
| 17 | at | Wake Forest | L 83–88 | -5.5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | at | Louisville | L 62–77 | -16.6 | +1.6 |
| 18 | vs | Pittsburgh | L 69–71 | +3.2 | -5.2 |
| 19 | N | SMU | L 69–86 | -7.9 | -9.1 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #4 in 2009–10. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 96 of 365 | 15–17 | 6.04 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 134 of 364 | 14–19 | 2.44 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 95 of 362 | 20–12 | 5.96 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 111 of 363 | 17–15 | 4.34 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 83 of 358 | 16–17 | 7.63 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 60 of 347 | 18–10 | 8.94 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 71 of 353 | 18–14 | 82.96 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 50 of 353 | 20–14 | 98.21 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 64 of 351 | 23–14 | 95.45 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 70 of 351 | 19–15 | 86.54 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 53 of 351 | 23–14 | 105.58 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 73 of 351 | 18–13 | 85.13 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 19 of 351 | 28–6 | 151.62 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 9 of 347 | 26–9 | 162.74 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 5 of 345 | 34–3 | 181.01 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 22 of 346 | 27–8 | 142.86 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 4 of 335 | 30–5 | 203.86 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 21 of 330 | 28–10 | 143.90 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 47 of 328 | 21–14 | 105.48 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 39 of 326 | 24–11 | 119.22 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 53 of 326 | 23–12 | 95.43 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 20 of 326 | 27–7 | 140.36 | MRI |