Delaware
CUSA · 1–2
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +4.3 avg | × 27% | +1.1 |
| Opponents faced | -6.6 avg | × 27% | -1.8 |
| Preseason prior | -10.8 | × 73% | -7.8 |
| Power | -8.5 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vs | Notre Dame (Md) non-D1 | W 105–44 | +27.7 | +33.3 | +0.6 |
| 2 | at | Wisconsin | L 64–73 | -27.8 | +18.8 | +1.0 |
| 3 | vs | James Madison | L 61–71 | -4.3 | -5.7 | -2.3 |
| Preseason prior (73% of the rating) | -7.8 | |||||
| Power | -8.5 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | vs | Colgate | -0.9 | 47% |
| 4 | vs | Wilson College non-D1 | +27.7 | 99% |
| 4 | at | Cal State Northridge | -8.1 | 23% |
| 5 | at | UCLA | -33.4 | 0% |
| 5 | at | Stony Brook | -6.2 | 28% |
| 10 | at | Liberty | -13.2 | 12% |
| 11 | at | Missouri State | -5.7 | 30% |
| 11 | at | Florida International | -9.0 | 21% |
Season by season
Best finish: #98 in 2013–14. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 10–21 | #298 of 365 · -10.05 | – |
| 2024–25 | 16–20 | #224 of 364 · -4.09 | – |
| 2023–24 | 19–14 | #169 of 362 · -0.35 | – |
| 2022–23 | 17–16 | #224 of 363 · -3.75 | – |
| 2021–22 | 22–13 | #156 of 358 · 1.12 | – |
| 2020–21 | 7–8 | #234 of 347 · -4.46 | – |
| 2019–20 | 21–11 | – | #150 of 353 · 42.49 |
| 2018–19 | 15–16 | – | #230 of 353 · 3.37 |
| 2017–18 | 14–19 | – | #241 of 351 · 6.28 |
| 2016–17 | 13–20 | – | #309 of 351 · -30.83 |
| 2015–16 | 7–23 | – | #312 of 351 · -34.71 |
| 2014–15 | 10–20 | – | #292 of 351 · -19.56 |
| 2013–14 | 25–10 | – | #98 of 351 · 70.34 |
| 2012–13 | 19–14 | – | #157 of 347 · 36.16 |
| 2011–12 | 18–13 | – | #185 of 345 · 28.25 |
| 2010–11 | 14–17 | – | #259 of 346 · -6.55 |
| 2009–10 | 7–24 | – | #295 of 335 · -28.16 |
| 2008–09 | 13–19 | – | #228 of 330 · 3.80 |
| 2007–08 | 14–17 | – | #245 of 328 · -6.29 |
| 2006–07 | 5–26 | – | #317 of 326 · -54.63 |
| 2005–06 | 9–21 | – | #270 of 326 · -13.63 |
| 2004–05 | 11–20 | – | #274 of 326 · -15.72 |