The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Arizona

Big 12 · 36–3

Power+31.4#3 of 365
Résumé+26.71#2 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winFlorida (93–87)
Worst lossKansas (78–82)
Schedule faced+12.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Florida W 93–87 +2.3 +3.7
1 vs Utah Tech W 93–67 +38.2 -12.2
2 vs Northern Arizona W 84–49 +45.2 -10.2
2 N UCLA W 69–65 +14.3 -10.3
3 at UConn W 71–67 +4.4 -0.4
4 vs Denver W 103–73 +39.6 -9.6
4 vs Norfolk State W 98–61 +41.9 -4.9
5 vs Auburn W 97–68 +15.6 +13.4
6 N Alabama W 96–75 +6.9 +14.1
7 vs Abilene Christian W 96–62 +40.4 -6.4
7 N San Diego State W 68–45 +17.6 +5.4
8 vs Bethune-Cookman W 107–71 +40.7 -4.7
9 vs South Dakota State W 99–71 +35.2 -7.2
9 at Utah W 97–78 +25.7 -6.7
10 vs Kansas State W 101–76 +29.2 -4.2
10 at TCU W 86–73 +15.7 -2.7
11 vs Arizona State W 89–82 +25.8 -18.8
11 at UCF W 84–77 +17.3 -10.3
12 vs Cincinnati W 77–51 +19.7 +6.3
12 vs West Virginia W 88–53 +22.3 +12.7
13 at BYU W 86–83 +9.4 -6.4
13 at Arizona State W 87–74 +20.3 -7.3
14 vs Oklahoma State W 84–47 +26.3 +10.7
15 at Kansas L 78–82 +8.4 -12.4
15 vs Texas Tech L 75–78 +12.6 -15.6
16 vs BYU W 75–68 +14.9 -7.9
16 at Houston W 73–66 +0.5 +6.5
17 at Baylor W 87–80 +15.2 -8.2
17 vs Kansas W 84–61 +13.8 +9.2
18 vs Iowa State W 73–57 +7.4 +8.6
18 at Colorado W 89–79 +20.1 -10.1
19 N UCF W 81–59 +20.1 +1.9
19 N Iowa State W 82–80 +4.7 -2.7
19 N Houston W 79–74 +3.2 +1.8
20 N Long Island University W 92–58 +35.5 -1.5
21 N Utah State W 78–66 +13.3 -1.3
21 N Arkansas W 109–88 +10.3 +10.7
21 N Purdue W 79–64 +5.8 +9.2
22 N Michigan L 73–91 -1.2 -16.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2014–15. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 150 2004–05: #11 of 326 (29-7)2005–06: #30 of 326 (20-13)2006–07: #38 of 326 (20-11)2007–08: #72 of 328 (19-15)2008–09: #72 of 330 (21-14)2009–10: #148 of 335 (16-15)2010–11: #20 of 346 (30-8)2011–12: #78 of 345 (22-12)2012–13: #16 of 347 (25-7)2013–14: #2 of 351 (33-5)2014–15: #2 of 351 (34-4)2015–16: #20 of 351 (25-9)2016–17: #10 of 351 (32-5)2017–18: #24 of 351 (26-8)2018–19: #104 of 353 (17-15)2019–20: #8 of 353 (21-11)2020–21: #25 of 347 (17-9)2021–22: #3 of 358 (33-4)2022–23: #8 of 363 (28-7)2023–24: #4 of 362 (27-9)2024–25: #9 of 364 (24-13)2025–26: #3 of 365 (36-3) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 3 of 365 36–3 31.38 Power
2024–25 9 of 364 24–13 22.36 Power
2023–24 4 of 362 27–9 23.62 Power
2022–23 8 of 363 28–7 19.48 Power
2021–22 3 of 358 33–4 22.47 Power
2020–21 25 of 347 17–9 12.84 Power
2019–20 8 of 353 21–11 144.86 MRI
2018–19 104 of 353 17–15 63.07 MRI
2017–18 24 of 351 26–8 136.07 MRI
2016–17 10 of 351 32–5 180.39 MRI
2015–16 20 of 351 25–9 146.09 MRI
2014–15 2 of 351 34–4 267.98 MRI
2013–14 2 of 351 33–5 229.28 MRI
2012–13 16 of 347 25–7 144.93 MRI
2011–12 78 of 345 22–12 83.30 MRI
2010–11 20 of 346 30–8 149.02 MRI
2009–10 148 of 335 16–15 47.09 MRI
2008–09 72 of 330 21–14 86.97 MRI
2007–08 72 of 328 19–15 84.10 MRI
2006–07 38 of 326 20–11 120.79 MRI
2005–06 30 of 326 20–13 114.25 MRI
2004–05 11 of 326 29–7 158.87 MRI