The MRI
2025–26 · Final

New Hampshire

Am. East · 9–21

Power-14.6#339 of 365
Résumé-10.43#697 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winBoston University (88–82)
Worst lossBinghamton (63–65)
Schedule faced-6.8 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Clemson L 38–88 -33.2 -16.8
1 vs Curry College non-D1 W 113–31 +26.0 +56.0
1 at Harvard L 75–86 -17.1 +6.1
2 vs Emmanuel (MA) non-D1 W 97–69 +26.0 +2.0
2 at George Mason L 44–61 -24.3 +7.3
3 at Providence L 66–98 -25.6 -6.4
4 vs Brown L 47–59 -4.2 -7.8
4 at Fairfield L 68–72 -10.9 +6.9
5 at Dartmouth L 68–69 -11.0 +10.0
5 vs Boston University W 88–82 -5.0 +11.0
7 vs Stonehill W 59–58 +1.4 -0.4
7 at Saint Louis L 79–93 -33.8 +19.8
9 at Nebraska L 55–86 -38.3 +7.3
9 vs Vermont L 61–80 -9.4 -9.6
10 at NJIT L 76–80 -3.8 -0.2
10 at UMBC L 74–75 -16.3 +15.3
12 at Maine W 65–48 -4.7 +21.7
12 vs Binghamton W 88–82 +6.0 +0.0
12 vs UAlbany W 80–72 -2.4 +10.3
13 vs UMass Lowell W 66–61 -3.9 +8.9
13 at Bryant L 84–92 -4.9 -3.1
14 at Vermont L 57–80 -14.9 -8.1
15 vs NJIT L 70–76 +1.6 -7.6
15 vs UMBC L 63–85 -10.9 -11.1
16 at UMass Lowell L 56–78 -9.3 -12.7
16 vs Maine L 58–61 +0.7 -3.7
17 at Binghamton L 63–65 +0.5 -2.5
17 at UAlbany L 61–84 -7.8 -15.2
18 vs Bryant W 88–83 +0.5 +4.5
18 at UMBC L 69–84 -16.3 +1.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #125 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #280 of 326 (9-19)2005–06: #287 of 326 (12-17)2006–07: #305 of 326 (10-20)2007–08: #247 of 328 (9-20)2008–09: #212 of 330 (14-16)2009–10: #236 of 335 (13-17)2010–11: #273 of 346 (12-18)2011–12: #273 of 345 (13-16)2012–13: #257 of 347 (8-20)2013–14: #330 of 351 (6-24)2014–15: #149 of 351 (19-13)2015–16: #173 of 351 (20-13)2016–17: #125 of 351 (20-12)2017–18: #245 of 351 (10-21)2018–19: #345 of 353 (3-24)2019–20: #197 of 353 (13-15)2020–21: #242 of 347 (10-9)2021–22: #223 of 358 (15-13)2022–23: #268 of 363 (15-15)2023–24: #245 of 362 (16-15)2024–25: #350 of 364 (8-24)2025–26: #339 of 365 (9-21) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 339 of 365 9–21 -14.61 Power
2024–25 350 of 364 8–24 -15.50 Power
2023–24 245 of 362 16–15 -4.97 Power
2022–23 268 of 363 15–15 -6.40 Power
2021–22 223 of 358 15–13 -3.59 Power
2020–21 242 of 347 10–9 -5.16 Power
2019–20 197 of 353 13–15 21.07 MRI
2018–19 345 of 353 3–24 -89.14 MRI
2017–18 245 of 351 10–21 5.11 MRI
2016–17 125 of 351 20–12 56.32 MRI
2015–16 173 of 351 20–13 37.71 MRI
2014–15 149 of 351 19–13 46.46 MRI
2013–14 330 of 351 6–24 -55.20 MRI
2012–13 257 of 347 8–20 -15.35 MRI
2011–12 273 of 345 13–16 -12.28 MRI
2010–11 273 of 346 12–18 -12.73 MRI
2009–10 236 of 335 13–17 6.07 MRI
2008–09 212 of 330 14–16 13.70 MRI
2007–08 247 of 328 9–20 -6.36 MRI
2006–07 305 of 326 10–20 -42.17 MRI
2005–06 287 of 326 12–17 -23.47 MRI
2004–05 280 of 326 9–19 -20.52 MRI