Boston College
ACC · 11–20
Power-1.6#193 of 365
Résumé-1.29#497 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWake Forest (68–67)
Worst lossCentral Connecticut (59–60)
Schedule faced+4.7 avg opponent
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at | Florida Atlantic | L 78–83 | -8.5 | +3.5 |
| 1 | vs | The Citadel | W 76–47 | +16.9 | +12.1 |
| 2 | vs | Central Connecticut | L 59–60 | +8.9 | -9.9 |
| 2 | at | Temple | W 76–71 | -4.5 | +9.4 |
| 3 | vs | Hampton | W 63–52 | +8.3 | +2.7 |
| 3 | N | Davidson | L 49–59 | -4.7 | -5.3 |
| 3 | N | Tulane | L 90–93 | +2.1 | -5.1 |
| 4 | vs | Harvard | W 73–60 | +1.4 | +11.6 |
| 5 | vs | LSU | L 69–78 | -8.4 | -0.6 |
| 5 | vs | New Haven | W 67–63 | +15.3 | -11.3 |
| 6 | N | Massachusetts | L 74–76 | +0.2 | -2.2 |
| 8 | vs | Fairleigh Dickinson | W 72–61 | +14.4 | -3.4 |
| 8 | vs | Le Moyne | W 72–64 | +11.8 | -3.8 |
| 9 | at | Georgia Tech | L 53–65 | -3.1 | -8.9 |
| 10 | vs | NC State | L 71–79 | -12.7 | +4.7 |
| 10 | at | Louisville | L 62–75 | -24.2 | +11.2 |
| 11 | at | Clemson | L 50–74 | -20.2 | -3.8 |
| 11 | vs | Syracuse | W 81–73 | -4.9 | +12.9 |
| 12 | vs | Pittsburgh | W 65–62 | -4.5 | +7.5 |
| 12 | at | Notre Dame | L 64–68 | -9.4 | +5.4 |
| 13 | vs | Virginia | L 66–73 | -17.2 | +10.2 |
| 14 | at | Duke | L 49–67 | -36.1 | +18.1 |
| 14 | vs | Miami | L 68–74 | -12.4 | +6.4 |
| 15 | vs | Stanford | L 64–70 | -7.9 | +1.9 |
| 15 | vs | California | L 75–86 | -5.9 | -5.1 |
| 16 | at | Florida State | L 72–80 | -13.1 | +5.1 |
| 16 | at | SMU | L 70–94 | -18.3 | -5.7 |
| 17 | vs | Wake Forest | W 68–67 | -7.7 | +8.7 |
| 17 | at | Miami | L 54–76 | -17.9 | -4.1 |
| 18 | at | Virginia Tech | L 63–72 | -13.3 | +4.3 |
| 18 | vs | Notre Dame | W 77–69 | -3.9 | +11.9 |
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season complete. | ||||
Season by season
Best finish: #21 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rank | Rec | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 193 of 365 | 11–20 | -1.61 | Power |
| 2024–25 | 210 of 364 | 12–19 | -2.68 | Power |
| 2023–24 | 94 of 362 | 20–16 | 5.98 | Power |
| 2022–23 | 195 of 363 | 16–17 | -1.38 | Power |
| 2021–22 | 182 of 358 | 13–20 | -0.48 | Power |
| 2020–21 | 253 of 347 | 4–16 | -5.94 | Power |
| 2019–20 | 268 of 353 | 13–19 | -9.19 | MRI |
| 2018–19 | 182 of 353 | 14–17 | 25.61 | MRI |
| 2017–18 | 128 of 351 | 19–16 | 58.51 | MRI |
| 2016–17 | 253 of 351 | 9–23 | 0.57 | MRI |
| 2015–16 | 310 of 351 | 7–25 | -33.66 | MRI |
| 2014–15 | 187 of 351 | 13–19 | 28.43 | MRI |
| 2013–14 | 289 of 351 | 8–24 | -16.42 | MRI |
| 2012–13 | 148 of 347 | 16–17 | 38.44 | MRI |
| 2011–12 | 314 of 345 | 9–22 | -46.74 | MRI |
| 2010–11 | 103 of 346 | 21–13 | 68.73 | MRI |
| 2009–10 | 113 of 335 | 15–16 | 63.04 | MRI |
| 2008–09 | 84 of 330 | 22–12 | 77.49 | MRI |
| 2007–08 | 151 of 328 | 14–17 | 40.16 | MRI |
| 2006–07 | 62 of 326 | 21–12 | 96.23 | MRI |
| 2005–06 | 21 of 326 | 28–8 | 121.09 | MRI |
| 2004–05 | 24 of 326 | 24–5 | 119.60 | MRI |