The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Boston College

ACC · 11–20

Power-1.6#193 of 365
Résumé-1.29#497 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winWake Forest (68–67)
Worst lossCentral Connecticut (59–60)
Schedule faced+4.7 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Florida Atlantic L 78–83 -8.5 +3.5
1 vs The Citadel W 76–47 +16.9 +12.1
2 vs Central Connecticut L 59–60 +8.9 -9.9
2 at Temple W 76–71 -4.5 +9.4
3 vs Hampton W 63–52 +8.3 +2.7
3 N Davidson L 49–59 -4.7 -5.3
3 N Tulane L 90–93 +2.1 -5.1
4 vs Harvard W 73–60 +1.4 +11.6
5 vs LSU L 69–78 -8.4 -0.6
5 vs New Haven W 67–63 +15.3 -11.3
6 N Massachusetts L 74–76 +0.2 -2.2
8 vs Fairleigh Dickinson W 72–61 +14.4 -3.4
8 vs Le Moyne W 72–64 +11.8 -3.8
9 at Georgia Tech L 53–65 -3.1 -8.9
10 vs NC State L 71–79 -12.7 +4.7
10 at Louisville L 62–75 -24.2 +11.2
11 at Clemson L 50–74 -20.2 -3.8
11 vs Syracuse W 81–73 -4.9 +12.9
12 vs Pittsburgh W 65–62 -4.5 +7.5
12 at Notre Dame L 64–68 -9.4 +5.4
13 vs Virginia L 66–73 -17.2 +10.2
14 at Duke L 49–67 -36.1 +18.1
14 vs Miami L 68–74 -12.4 +6.4
15 vs Stanford L 64–70 -7.9 +1.9
15 vs California L 75–86 -5.9 -5.1
16 at Florida State L 72–80 -13.1 +5.1
16 at SMU L 70–94 -18.3 -5.7
17 vs Wake Forest W 68–67 -7.7 +8.7
17 at Miami L 54–76 -17.9 -4.1
18 at Virginia Tech L 63–72 -13.3 +4.3
18 vs Notre Dame W 77–69 -3.9 +11.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #21 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #24 of 326 (24-5)2005–06: #21 of 326 (28-8)2006–07: #62 of 326 (21-12)2007–08: #151 of 328 (14-17)2008–09: #84 of 330 (22-12)2009–10: #113 of 335 (15-16)2010–11: #103 of 346 (21-13)2011–12: #314 of 345 (9-22)2012–13: #148 of 347 (16-17)2013–14: #289 of 351 (8-24)2014–15: #187 of 351 (13-19)2015–16: #310 of 351 (7-25)2016–17: #253 of 351 (9-23)2017–18: #128 of 351 (19-16)2018–19: #182 of 353 (14-17)2019–20: #268 of 353 (13-19)2020–21: #253 of 347 (4-16)2021–22: #182 of 358 (13-20)2022–23: #195 of 363 (16-17)2023–24: #94 of 362 (20-16)2024–25: #210 of 364 (12-19)2025–26: #193 of 365 (11-20) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 193 of 365 11–20 -1.61 Power
2024–25 210 of 364 12–19 -2.68 Power
2023–24 94 of 362 20–16 5.98 Power
2022–23 195 of 363 16–17 -1.38 Power
2021–22 182 of 358 13–20 -0.48 Power
2020–21 253 of 347 4–16 -5.94 Power
2019–20 268 of 353 13–19 -9.19 MRI
2018–19 182 of 353 14–17 25.61 MRI
2017–18 128 of 351 19–16 58.51 MRI
2016–17 253 of 351 9–23 0.57 MRI
2015–16 310 of 351 7–25 -33.66 MRI
2014–15 187 of 351 13–19 28.43 MRI
2013–14 289 of 351 8–24 -16.42 MRI
2012–13 148 of 347 16–17 38.44 MRI
2011–12 314 of 345 9–22 -46.74 MRI
2010–11 103 of 346 21–13 68.73 MRI
2009–10 113 of 335 15–16 63.04 MRI
2008–09 84 of 330 22–12 77.49 MRI
2007–08 151 of 328 14–17 40.16 MRI
2006–07 62 of 326 21–12 96.23 MRI
2005–06 21 of 326 28–8 121.09 MRI
2004–05 24 of 326 24–5 119.60 MRI