The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UNC Asheville

Big South · 15–17

Power-4.0#219 of 365
Résumé-3.69#595 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winLipscomb (69–64)
Worst lossPresbyterian (70–71)
Schedule faced-5.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Wichita State L 58–75 -15.4 -1.6
1 at Georgia Southern L 90–93 -1.6 -1.4
2 vs Lipscomb W 69–64 -2.0 +7.0
2 vs Bryan (TN) non-D1 W 92–54 +36.6 +1.4
3 at Western Carolina L 73–80 -1.8 -5.2
4 vs Tennessee State L 73–75 -0.3 -1.7
4 N App State W 67–55 -3.3 +15.3
5 N UNC Greensboro W 82–77 +3.4 +1.6
5 at NC State L 63–75 -20.6 +8.6
6 vs Miami (OH) L 87–90 -9.7 +6.7
6 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota L 59–80 -7.1 -13.9
7 vs Kentucky Christian non-D1 W 83–73 +36.6 -26.6
7 vs Morris College non-D1 W 89–56 +36.6 -3.6
7 at UAB L 47–72 -11.1 -13.9
9 vs High Point L 69–87 -12.2 -5.8
9 at Charleston Southern L 83–86 -0.9 -2.1
10 vs Longwood W 72–61 +3.3 +7.7
10 at Radford W 91–72 -2.5 +21.5
11 at Presbyterian L 70–71 -0.5 -0.5
11 vs Winthrop L 67–69 -4.3 +2.3
12 at South Carolina Upstate W 83–69 +2.7 +11.3
13 vs Gardner-Webb W 69–50 +19.8 -0.8
13 at Winthrop L 71–84 -9.7 -3.3
14 vs South Carolina Upstate W 76–67 +8.2 +0.8
15 at Longwood W 79–74 -2.2 +7.2
15 vs Presbyterian L 57–58 +4.9 -5.9
16 at High Point L 48–74 -17.6 -8.4
16 vs Radford W 74–73 +2.9 -1.9
17 at Gardner-Webb W 77–71 +14.3 -8.3
17 vs Charleston Southern L 75–92 +4.5 -21.5
18 N Longwood W 85–82 +0.5 +2.5
18 N High Point L 71–75 -14.9 +10.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #62 in 2016–17. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #256 of 326 (11-17)2005–06: #289 of 326 (9-19)2006–07: #252 of 326 (12-19)2007–08: #132 of 328 (23-10)2008–09: #246 of 330 (15-16)2009–10: #210 of 335 (15-16)2010–11: #109 of 346 (20-14)2011–12: #76 of 345 (24-10)2012–13: #189 of 347 (13-16)2013–14: #178 of 351 (17-15)2014–15: #215 of 351 (15-16)2015–16: #77 of 351 (22-12)2016–17: #62 of 351 (23-10)2017–18: #159 of 351 (21-13)2018–19: #350 of 353 (2-26)2019–20: #247 of 353 (13-16)2020–21: #226 of 347 (10-10)2021–22: #189 of 358 (17-15)2022–23: #140 of 363 (27-8)2023–24: #155 of 362 (22-12)2024–25: #169 of 364 (21-11)2025–26: #219 of 365 (15-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 219 of 365 15–17 -4.05 Power
2024–25 169 of 364 21–11 -0.27 Power
2023–24 155 of 362 22–12 1.44 Power
2022–23 140 of 363 27–8 2.18 Power
2021–22 189 of 358 17–15 -0.82 Power
2020–21 226 of 347 10–10 -3.84 Power
2019–20 247 of 353 13–16 0.00 MRI
2018–19 350 of 353 2–26 -115.47 MRI
2017–18 159 of 351 21–13 44.30 MRI
2016–17 62 of 351 23–10 92.50 MRI
2015–16 77 of 351 22–12 84.32 MRI
2014–15 215 of 351 15–16 18.47 MRI
2013–14 178 of 351 17–15 34.13 MRI
2012–13 189 of 347 13–16 22.90 MRI
2011–12 76 of 345 24–10 85.35 MRI
2010–11 109 of 346 20–14 66.76 MRI
2009–10 210 of 335 15–16 14.38 MRI
2008–09 246 of 330 15–16 -0.15 MRI
2007–08 132 of 328 23–10 51.77 MRI
2006–07 252 of 326 12–19 -8.93 MRI
2005–06 289 of 326 9–19 -26.71 MRI
2004–05 256 of 326 11–17 -7.27 MRI