The MRI
2025–26 · Final

UNLV

Mountain West · 18–17

Power+4.6#109 of 365
Résumé+5.09#94 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUtah State (86–76)
Worst lossUT Martin (81–86)
Schedule faced+4.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs UT Martin L 81–86 +10.9 -15.9
1 vs Chattanooga W 101–69 +12.0 +20.0
2 vs Montana L 93–102 +9.4 -18.4
2 at Memphis W 92–78 -2.1 +16.1
3 vs Saint Joseph's W 99–85 +3.0 +11.0
4 N Maryland L 67–74 -0.7 -6.3
4 N Alabama L 76–115 -19.9 -19.1
4 N Rutgers L 65–80 +1.8 -16.8
5 at Stanford W 75–74 -7.2 +8.2
6 vs Tennessee State L 60–63 +8.3 -11.3
7 vs Fresno State W 84–72 +8.5 +3.5
9 vs La Sierra non-D1 W 89–47 +45.2 -3.2
9 vs Air Force W 67–39 +25.5 +2.5
10 at Wyoming L 66–98 -2.7 -29.3
10 at Colorado State L 62–70 -6.8 -1.2
11 vs Boise State W 89–85 -3.6 +7.6
11 at San José State W 76–62 +7.5 +6.5
12 at Utah State W 86–76 -16.2 +26.2
12 vs San Diego State L 71–82 -6.4 -4.6
13 vs New Mexico L 61–89 -7.8 -20.2
13 at Nevada L 76–89 -7.8 -5.2
14 at Fresno State L 96–98 +3.0 -5.0
14 vs Grand Canyon W 80–78 -3.2 +5.2
15 vs San José State W 82–75 +13.0 -6.0
15 at Boise State W 86–83 -9.1 +12.1
16 vs Colorado State L 86–91 -1.4 -3.6
16 at Air Force W 91–66 +20.1 +4.9
17 at Grand Canyon L 67–80 -8.7 -4.3
17 vs Nevada W 85–83 -2.3 +4.3
18 vs Utah State W 92–65 -10.7 +37.7
18 at San Diego State L 86–89 -11.9 +8.9
19 N Wyoming W 73–70 +0.0 +3.0
19 N Utah State L 60–80 -13.5 -6.5
20 at UC Irvine W 75–72 -4.1 +7.1
20 at Tulsa L 66–77 -7.7 -3.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #20 in 2006–07. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #116 of 326 (17-14)2005–06: #93 of 326 (17-13)2006–07: #20 of 326 (30-7)2007–08: #33 of 328 (27-8)2008–09: #83 of 330 (21-11)2009–10: #40 of 335 (25-9)2010–11: #29 of 346 (24-9)2011–12: #29 of 345 (25-9)2012–13: #33 of 347 (24-9)2013–14: #76 of 351 (20-13)2014–15: #154 of 351 (18-15)2015–16: #117 of 351 (18-15)2016–17: #258 of 351 (11-21)2017–18: #88 of 351 (20-13)2018–19: #137 of 353 (17-14)2019–20: #90 of 353 (17-15)2020–21: #165 of 347 (12-15)2021–22: #104 of 358 (18-14)2022–23: #96 of 363 (19-13)2023–24: #77 of 362 (21-13)2024–25: #98 of 364 (18-15)2025–26: #109 of 365 (18-17) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 109 of 365 18–17 4.56 Power
2024–25 98 of 364 18–15 5.78 Power
2023–24 77 of 362 21–13 7.98 Power
2022–23 96 of 363 19–13 5.99 Power
2021–22 104 of 358 18–14 5.05 Power
2020–21 165 of 347 12–15 0.11 Power
2019–20 90 of 353 17–15 72.91 MRI
2018–19 137 of 353 17–14 46.45 MRI
2017–18 88 of 351 20–13 80.01 MRI
2016–17 258 of 351 11–21 -3.13 MRI
2015–16 117 of 351 18–15 62.84 MRI
2014–15 154 of 351 18–15 44.05 MRI
2013–14 76 of 351 20–13 81.87 MRI
2012–13 33 of 347 24–9 121.39 MRI
2011–12 29 of 345 25–9 130.34 MRI
2010–11 29 of 346 24–9 125.25 MRI
2009–10 40 of 335 25–9 120.69 MRI
2008–09 83 of 330 21–11 78.44 MRI
2007–08 33 of 328 27–8 124.17 MRI
2006–07 20 of 326 30–7 135.28 MRI
2005–06 93 of 326 17–13 69.06 MRI
2004–05 116 of 326 17–14 52.82 MRI