Utah

Big 12 · 10–22

Power+2.9#132 of 365

Résumé+0.98#145 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winTCU (82–79)
Worst lossCal Poly (85–92)
Schedule faced+9.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	San José State	W 84–75	+11.3	-2.3
1	vs	Weber State	W 92–89	+8.8	-5.8
2	vs	Holy Cross	W 87–69	+19.0	-1.0
2	vs	Sam Houston	W 85–79	+1.4	+4.6
3	vs	Purdue Fort Wayne	W 85–77	+10.1	-2.1
3	vs	Cal Poly	L 85–92	+11.0	-18.0
4	N	Grand Canyon	L 58–68	-7.6	-2.4
4	N	Ole Miss	W 75–74	-6.8	+7.8
5	at	California	L 72–79	-6.9	-0.1
5	vs	California Baptist	W 91–85	+1.9	+4.1
6	N	Mississippi State	L 74–82	-3.2	-4.8
7	vs	Eastern Washington	W 101–77	+9.0	+15.0
9	at	Washington	L 65–74	-10.7	+1.7
9	vs	Arizona	L 78–97	-25.7	+6.7
10	at	Colorado	L 73–85	-8.4	-3.6
10	vs	BYU	L 84–89	-13.6	+8.6
11	at	Texas Tech	L 74–88	-21.3	+7.3
11	vs	TCU	W 82–79	-7.3	+10.3
12	at	Kansas State	L 78–81	-4.8	+1.8
12	at	BYU	L 78–91	-19.0	+6.0
13	vs	Oklahoma State	L 69–81	-2.2	-9.8
14	vs	Arizona State	L 63–71	-2.7	-5.3
14	at	Kansas	L 59–71	-20.1	+8.1
15	vs	Houston	L 52–66	-22.5	+8.5
15	at	Cincinnati	L 65–69	-14.2	+10.2
16	at	West Virginia	W 61–56	-11.6	+16.6
16	vs	UCF	L 71–73	-5.7	+3.7
17	vs	Iowa State	L 59–75	-21.0	+5.0
17	at	Arizona State	L 60–73	-8.2	-4.8
18	vs	Colorado	L 78–92	-2.9	-11.1
18	at	Baylor	L 75–101	-13.3	-12.7
19	N	Cincinnati	L 66–73	-11.5	+4.5

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #8 in 2014–15. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	132 of 365	10–22	2.91	Power
2024–25	72 of 364	16–17	8.97	Power
2023–24	48 of 362	22–15	12.06	Power
2022–23	85 of 363	17–15	7.58	Power
2021–22	139 of 358	11–20	2.80	Power
2020–21	97 of 347	12–13	6.31	Power
2019–20	151 of 353	16–15	42.25	MRI
2018–19	141 of 353	17–14	44.12	MRI
2017–18	78 of 351	23–12	86.55	MRI
2016–17	45 of 351	20–11	109.16	MRI
2015–16	38 of 351	27–9	117.18	MRI
2014–15	8 of 351	26–9	174.89	MRI
2013–14	51 of 351	21–12	101.72	MRI
2012–13	196 of 347	13–18	19.90	MRI
2011–12	330 of 345	6–25	-70.21	MRI
2010–11	213 of 346	13–18	19.41	MRI
2009–10	189 of 335	14–17	26.16	MRI
2008–09	37 of 330	24–10	116.33	MRI
2007–08	83 of 328	18–15	75.30	MRI
2006–07	159 of 326	11–19	34.36	MRI
2005–06	153 of 326	14–15	36.10	MRI
2004–05	16 of 326	28–6	147.52	MRI