Minnesota

Big Ten · 15–18

Power+7.1#89 of 365

Résumé+4.62#99 · wins above average

Trendrating by week

Best winMichigan State (76–73)
Worst lossPenn State (75–77)
Schedule faced+8.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

Wk		Opponent	Result	Expected	Perf
1	vs	Gardner-Webb	W 87–60	+30.9	-3.9
1	vs	Alcorn State	W 95–50	+27.6	+17.4
2	at	Missouri	L 60–83	-8.4	-14.6
2	vs	Green Bay	W 72–65	+15.1	-8.1
3	vs	Chicago State	W 66–54	+27.4	-15.4
3	N	San Francisco	L 65–77	+3.0	-15.0
4	N	Stanford	L 68–72	-2.0	-2.0
4	N	Santa Clara	L 75–86	-8.1	-2.9
5	vs	Indiana	W 73–64	-4.4	+13.4
6	at	Purdue	L 57–85	-21.2	-6.8
6	vs	Texas Southern	W 89–53	+21.5	+14.5
7	vs	Campbell	W 78–50	+12.4	+15.6
9	vs	Fairleigh Dickinson	W 60–43	+23.1	-6.1
9	at	Northwestern	W 84–78	-6.0	+12.0
10	vs	Iowa	W 70–67	-8.0	+11.0
10	vs	USC	L 69–70	+1.1	-2.1
11	vs	Wisconsin	L 75–78	-9.7	+6.7
11	at	Illinois	L 67–77	-22.3	+12.3
12	at	Ohio State	L 74–82	-13.2	+5.2
12	vs	Nebraska	L 57–76	-11.2	-7.8
13	at	Wisconsin	L 63–67	-15.1	+11.1
13	at	Penn State	L 75–77	+1.8	-3.8
14	vs	Michigan State	W 76–73	-14.6	+17.6
14	vs	Maryland	L 62–67	+4.5	-9.5
15	at	Washington	L 57–69	-6.5	-5.5
16	at	Oregon	W 61–44	-2.8	+19.8
16	vs	Rutgers	W 80–61	+7.1	+11.9
17	at	Michigan	L 67–77	-28.3	+18.3
17	vs	UCLA	W 78–73	-7.3	+12.3
18	at	Indiana	L 47–77	-9.9	-20.1
18	vs	Northwestern	W 67–66	-0.6	+1.6
19	N	Rutgers	L 67–72	+4.3	-9.3
22	N	Baylor	L 48–67	-6.4	-12.6

Remaining schedule

Wk		Opponent	Projected	Win prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #24 in 2012–13. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

Season	Rank	Rec	Rating
2025–26	89 of 365	15–18	7.07	Power
2024–25	102 of 364	15–17	5.18	Power
2023–24	100 of 362	19–15	5.73	Power
2022–23	223 of 363	9–22	-3.48	Power
2021–22	121 of 358	13–17	4.00	Power
2020–21	106 of 347	14–15	5.72	Power
2019–20	77 of 353	15–16	79.55	MRI
2018–19	77 of 353	22–14	74.09	MRI
2017–18	175 of 351	14–17	38.15	MRI
2016–17	38 of 351	24–10	114.74	MRI
2015–16	283 of 351	8–23	-17.71	MRI
2014–15	65 of 351	18–15	87.38	MRI
2013–14	49 of 351	25–13	103.94	MRI
2012–13	24 of 347	20–12	132.53	MRI
2011–12	85 of 345	23–15	80.07	MRI
2010–11	100 of 346	17–14	69.33	MRI
2009–10	32 of 335	21–14	129.55	MRI
2008–09	53 of 330	22–11	100.92	MRI
2007–08	77 of 328	20–14	80.14	MRI
2006–07	251 of 326	9–22	-7.51	MRI
2005–06	79 of 326	16–15	79.14	MRI
2004–05	37 of 326	21–10	106.06	MRI