The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Washington State

WCC · 12–20

Power+1.2#146 of 365
Résumé-1.92#548 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSt. Thomas-Minnesota (81–71)
Worst lossPepperdine (79–88)
Schedule faced+2.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Idaho L 81–83 +4.4 -6.4
1 at Davidson L 69–85 -4.6 -11.4
2 vs St. Thomas-Minnesota W 81–71 -1.9 +11.9
2 vs Washington L 69–81 -6.9 -5.1
3 vs Southern Utah W 98–74 +12.3 +11.7
4 at Chaminade non-D1 W 90–85 +36.3 -31.3
4 N Arizona State L 94–100 -7.2 +1.2
4 N Seton Hall L 61–75 -9.1 -4.9
5 at Bradley L 60–64 -6.5 +2.5
5 vs Nevada L 64–78 -5.7 -8.3
7 at USC L 61–68 -10.3 +3.3
7 at Eastern Washington W 78–63 +1.8 +13.2
7 vs Mercer W 84–78 +3.2 +2.8
8 at Portland W 67–62 +4.7 +0.3
9 at Seattle U L 55–69 -5.6 -8.4
9 vs Loyola Marymount W 78–76 +4.6 -2.6
10 vs Oregon State W 81–67 +4.4 +9.6
10 at Saint Mary's L 82–88 -20.4 +14.4
11 vs Gonzaga L 65–86 -20.8 -0.2
12 at San Francisco L 80–85 -5.6 +0.6
12 at San Diego L 92–96 +6.7 -10.7
12 vs Pepperdine W 95–79 +13.8 +2.2
13 vs Seattle U W 70–58 -0.2 +12.2
13 vs Portland W 104–74 +10.1 +19.9
14 at Oregon State L 64–74 -1.1 -8.9
14 vs Santa Clara L 92–96 -11.3 +7.3
15 at Gonzaga L 53–83 -26.3 -3.7
16 vs Pacific W 87–70 +3.6 +13.4
16 vs Saint Mary's L 67–83 -14.9 -1.1
17 at Loyola Marymount L 66–67 -0.8 -0.2
17 at Pepperdine L 79–88 +8.4 -17.4
18 N Portland L 68–74 +7.4 -13.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #17 in 2007–08. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #147 of 326 (11-16)2005–06: #170 of 326 (11-17)2006–07: #51 of 326 (26-8)2007–08: #17 of 328 (26-9)2008–09: #97 of 330 (17-16)2009–10: #140 of 335 (16-15)2010–11: #67 of 346 (22-13)2011–12: #165 of 345 (15-16)2012–13: #111 of 347 (13-19)2013–14: #248 of 351 (10-21)2014–15: #280 of 351 (13-18)2015–16: #256 of 351 (9-22)2016–17: #268 of 351 (13-18)2017–18: #268 of 351 (12-19)2018–19: #263 of 353 (11-21)2019–20: #140 of 353 (16-16)2020–21: #120 of 347 (14-13)2021–22: #43 of 358 (22-15)2022–23: #74 of 363 (17-17)2023–24: #43 of 362 (25-10)2024–25: #103 of 364 (20-14)2025–26: #146 of 365 (12-20) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 146 of 365 12–20 1.17 Power
2024–25 103 of 364 20–14 5.04 Power
2023–24 43 of 362 25–10 12.48 Power
2022–23 74 of 363 17–17 9.07 Power
2021–22 43 of 358 22–15 11.13 Power
2020–21 120 of 347 14–13 3.84 Power
2019–20 140 of 353 16–16 45.78 MRI
2018–19 263 of 353 11–21 -8.43 MRI
2017–18 268 of 351 12–19 -5.81 MRI
2016–17 268 of 351 13–18 -7.99 MRI
2015–16 256 of 351 9–22 -8.05 MRI
2014–15 280 of 351 13–18 -11.52 MRI
2013–14 248 of 351 10–21 4.66 MRI
2012–13 111 of 347 13–19 55.15 MRI
2011–12 165 of 345 15–16 37.94 MRI
2010–11 67 of 346 22–13 88.07 MRI
2009–10 140 of 335 16–15 49.26 MRI
2008–09 97 of 330 17–16 68.55 MRI
2007–08 17 of 328 26–9 144.53 MRI
2006–07 51 of 326 26–8 108.01 MRI
2005–06 170 of 326 11–17 30.57 MRI
2004–05 147 of 326 11–16 39.74 MRI