The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Colgate

Patriot · 0–3

Power-4.6#216 of 365
Résumé-0.85#458 · wins above average
Movement-12down from #204 last week
Worst lossDrexel (74–77)
Schedule faced+8.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-9.8 avg opponent
Returning production52% of last season's win shares · #34 of 364
Incoming production0.0 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-12.8 avg× 27%-3.5
Opponents faced+8.1 avg× 27%+2.2
Preseason prior-4.6× 73%-3.3
Power-4.6

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Washington L 76–90 -16.6 +2.6 -0.3
2 at Drexel L 74–77 +0.1 -3.1 -0.4
3 at St. John's L 59–90 -30.7 -0.3 -0.6
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-3.3
Power-4.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Delaware +0.9 53%
4 vs Utica non-D1 +31.5 100%
4 vs Penn State-Behrend non-D1 +31.5 100%
5 at Hofstra -8.7 22%
5 N Vermont -1.7 44%
5 N Merrimack +1.5 56%
7 at Syracuse -21.8 2%

Season by season

Best finish: #46 in 2020–21. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #255 of 326 (12-16)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #255 of 326 (10-19)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #259 of 326 (10-19)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #180 of 328 (18-14)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #298 of 330 (10-20)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #267 of 335 (10-19)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #315 of 346 (7-23)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #325 of 345 (8-21)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #303 of 347 (11-21)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #217 of 351 (13-18)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #186 of 351 (16-17)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #240 of 351 (13-17)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #290 of 351 (10-22)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #185 of 351 (19-14)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #74 of 353 (23-11)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #62 of 353 (24-9)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 347 (14-2)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 358 (23-12)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 363 (26-9)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #127 of 362 (25-10)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #230 of 364 (14-19)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #212 of 365 (18-15) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 18–15 #212 of 365 · -3.83 –
2024–25 14–19 #230 of 364 · -4.64 –
2023–24 25–10 #127 of 362 · 3.14 –
2022–23 26–9 #99 of 363 · 5.40 –
2021–22 23–12 #102 of 358 · 5.15 –
2020–21 14–2 #46 of 347 · 10.29 –
2019–20 24–9 – #62 of 353 · 85.91
2018–19 23–11 – #74 of 353 · 79.72
2017–18 19–14 – #185 of 351 · 32.65
2016–17 10–22 – #290 of 351 · -20.47
2015–16 13–17 – #240 of 351 · 2.17
2014–15 16–17 – #186 of 351 · 29.12
2013–14 13–18 – #217 of 351 · 18.18
2012–13 11–21 – #303 of 347 · -34.87
2011–12 8–21 – #325 of 345 · -58.46
2010–11 7–23 – #315 of 346 · -47.22
2009–10 10–19 – #267 of 335 · -8.89
2008–09 10–20 – #298 of 330 · -37.72
2007–08 18–14 – #180 of 328 · 25.80
2006–07 10–19 – #259 of 326 · -12.41
2005–06 10–19 – #255 of 326 · -8.18
2004–05 12–16 – #255 of 326 · -7.11