The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Winthrop

Big South · 23–11

Power+3.0#131 of 365
Résumé+2.15#128 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winHigh Point (92–75)
Worst lossNorth Dakota (88–90)
Schedule faced-5.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 N Queens University W 81–74 +4.8 +2.2
1 at George Mason L 90–96 -6.7 +0.7
2 at Coastal Carolina L 66–72 +6.5 -12.5
2 vs Mercer W 105–69 +5.0 +31.0
3 at Arkansas L 83–84 -20.8 +19.8
4 at Jackson State W 80–62 +16.1 +1.9
4 at Nebraska L 73–80 -20.7 +13.7
4 vs South Carolina State W 101–79 +22.7 -0.7
5 at Long Island University W 94–92 +4.3 -2.3
5 vs Coastal Carolina L 84–88 +12.0 -16.0
6 vs Toccoa Falls non-D1 W 111–62 +43.6 +5.4
6 vs Bob Jones non-D1 W 101–55 +43.6 +2.4
7 at North Dakota L 88–90 +7.4 -9.4
7 vs Clinton College non-D1 W 107–41 +43.6 +22.4
8 at Texas Tech L 57–87 -21.3 -8.7
9 at Longwood L 70–82 +4.8 -16.8
9 vs Gardner-Webb W 88–77 +26.8 -15.8
10 vs Charleston Southern W 81–77 +11.5 -7.5
10 at South Carolina Upstate W 71–50 +9.7 +11.3
11 vs High Point W 92–75 -5.2 +22.2
11 at UNC Asheville W 69–67 +4.3 -2.3
12 vs Radford W 76–75 +9.9 -8.9
12 at Presbyterian W 82–72 +6.5 +3.5
13 vs UNC Asheville W 84–71 +9.7 +3.3
14 at Radford W 80–78 +4.5 -2.5
14 vs Longwood W 79–74 +10.3 -5.3
15 at Gardner-Webb W 103–85 +21.3 -3.3
16 vs South Carolina Upstate W 68–64 +15.2 -11.2
16 at High Point L 87–89 -10.6 +8.6
17 at Charleston Southern L 84–86 +6.1 -8.1
17 vs Presbyterian W 74–70 +11.9 -7.9
18 N Charleston Southern W 86–81 +8.8 -3.8
18 N Presbyterian W 73–71 +9.2 -7.2
18 N High Point L 76–91 -7.9 -7.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #16 in 2005–06. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #56 of 326 (26-6)2005–06: #16 of 326 (23-8)2006–07: #34 of 326 (29-5)2007–08: #61 of 328 (22-12)2008–09: #265 of 330 (11-19)2009–10: #145 of 335 (19-14)2010–11: #189 of 346 (13-17)2011–12: #232 of 345 (12-20)2012–13: #260 of 347 (11-17)2013–14: #188 of 351 (20-13)2014–15: #136 of 351 (19-13)2015–16: #135 of 351 (23-9)2016–17: #68 of 351 (26-7)2017–18: #106 of 351 (19-12)2018–19: #189 of 353 (15-12)2019–20: #49 of 353 (22-10)2020–21: #38 of 347 (23-2)2021–22: #133 of 358 (23-9)2022–23: #218 of 363 (15-17)2023–24: #171 of 362 (17-15)2024–25: #154 of 364 (23-11)2025–26: #131 of 365 (23-11) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 131 of 365 23–11 2.96 Power
2024–25 154 of 364 23–11 1.02 Power
2023–24 171 of 362 17–15 -0.36 Power
2022–23 218 of 363 15–17 -3.19 Power
2021–22 133 of 358 23–9 3.23 Power
2020–21 38 of 347 23–2 10.85 Power
2019–20 49 of 353 22–10 92.27 MRI
2018–19 189 of 353 15–12 23.82 MRI
2017–18 106 of 351 19–12 69.03 MRI
2016–17 68 of 351 26–7 87.01 MRI
2015–16 135 of 351 23–9 56.24 MRI
2014–15 136 of 351 19–13 51.12 MRI
2013–14 188 of 351 20–13 31.39 MRI
2012–13 260 of 347 11–17 -16.27 MRI
2011–12 232 of 345 12–20 9.05 MRI
2010–11 189 of 346 13–17 29.04 MRI
2009–10 145 of 335 19–14 47.79 MRI
2008–09 265 of 330 11–19 -10.63 MRI
2007–08 61 of 328 22–12 92.13 MRI
2006–07 34 of 326 29–5 124.46 MRI
2005–06 16 of 326 23–8 126.84 MRI
2004–05 56 of 326 26–6 92.10 MRI