Winthrop
Big South · 0–3
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | -8.7 avg | × 27% | -2.3 |
| Opponents faced | -2.8 avg | × 27% | -0.8 |
| Preseason prior | -1.2 | × 73% | -0.9 |
| Power | -4.0 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | N | Queens University | L 98–103 | -2.4 | -2.6 | -0.8 |
| 2 | vs | North Dakota | L 90–93 | +7.9 | -10.9 | -2.0 |
| 3 | at | Kennesaw State | L 79–88 | -9.1 | +0.1 | -0.3 |
| Preseason prior (73% of the rating) | -0.9 | |||||
| Power | -4.0 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | vs | Jackson State | +9.6 | 81% |
| 4 | vs | Chattanooga | +2.3 | 58% |
| 4 | at | Wofford | -2.2 | 42% |
| 5 | at | Illinois | -36.0 | 0% |
| 5 | vs | Clinton College non-D1 | +32.1 | 100% |
Season by season
Best finish: #16 in 2005–06. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 23–11 | #131 of 365 · 2.56 | – |
| 2024–25 | 23–11 | #147 of 364 · 1.07 | – |
| 2023–24 | 17–15 | #164 of 362 · 0.20 | – |
| 2022–23 | 15–17 | #226 of 363 · -3.81 | – |
| 2021–22 | 23–9 | #141 of 358 · 2.60 | – |
| 2020–21 | 23–2 | #42 of 347 · 10.73 | – |
| 2019–20 | 22–10 | – | #49 of 353 · 92.27 |
| 2018–19 | 15–12 | – | #189 of 353 · 23.82 |
| 2017–18 | 19–12 | – | #106 of 351 · 69.03 |
| 2016–17 | 26–7 | – | #68 of 351 · 87.01 |
| 2015–16 | 23–9 | – | #135 of 351 · 56.24 |
| 2014–15 | 19–13 | – | #136 of 351 · 51.12 |
| 2013–14 | 20–13 | – | #188 of 351 · 31.39 |
| 2012–13 | 11–17 | – | #260 of 347 · -16.27 |
| 2011–12 | 12–20 | – | #232 of 345 · 9.05 |
| 2010–11 | 13–17 | – | #189 of 346 · 29.04 |
| 2009–10 | 19–14 | – | #145 of 335 · 47.79 |
| 2008–09 | 11–19 | – | #265 of 330 · -10.63 |
| 2007–08 | 22–12 | – | #61 of 328 · 92.13 |
| 2006–07 | 29–5 | – | #34 of 326 · 124.46 |
| 2005–06 | 23–8 | – | #16 of 326 · 126.84 |
| 2004–05 | 26–6 | – | #56 of 326 · 92.10 |